linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luanshi <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: clear cmd_busy bit when Command Completed in polling mode
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:55:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a40adbb-bb83-701e-c2eb-0f80b618f159@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211126173309.GA12255@wunner.de>

Hi Bjorn & Lukas & Kuppuswamy & Amey,

Gentle ping! Any comments on this patch,should be merged?


Thanks,

Liguang

在 2021/11/27 1:33, Lukas Wunner 写道:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:42:58PM +0800, Liguang Zhang wrote:
>> This patch fixes this problem that on driver probe from system startup,
>> pciehp checks the Presence Detect State bit in the Slot Status register
>> to bring up an occupied slot or bring down an unoccupied slot. If empty
>> slot's power status is on, turn power off. The Hot-Plug interrupt isn't
>> requested yet, so avoid triggering a notification by calling
>> pcie_disable_notification().
>>
>> Both the CCIE and HPIE bits are masked in pcie_disable_notification(),
>> when we issue a hotplug command, pcie_wait_cmd() will polling the
>> Command Completed bit instead of waiting for an interrupt. But cmd_busy
>> bit was not cleared when Command Completed which results in timeouts
>> like this in pciehp_power_off_slot() and pcie_init_notification():
>>
>>    pcieport 0000:00:03.0: pciehp: Timeout on hotplug command 0x01c0
>> (issued 2264 msec ago)
>>    pcieport 0000:00:03.0: pciehp: Timeout on hotplug command 0x05c0
>> (issued 2288 msec ago)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Fixes: a5dd4b4b0570 ("PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion where necessary")
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215143
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
>
> Thanks a lot, that's a really good catch.
>
> It's a somewhat intricate bug, so I'll try to explain in my own words:
>
> If notification is disabled (HPIE or CCIE not set in the Slot Status
> register), we rely on pcie_poll_cmd() to poll for Command Completed.
> But once it's signaled, we neglect to clear ctrl->cmd_busy.
> (Normally it is cleared by the hardirq handler pciehp_isr() if
> notification is enabled.)
>
> The result is that starting with the second Slot Control write,
> pciehp will gratuitously wait for a command to finish which has
> already finished and it will incorrectly report a timeout.
>
> The bug was originally introduced in 2015 by commit a5dd4b4b0570
> ("PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion where necessary"),
> but didn't manifest itself because the first Slot Control Write already
> enabled notification and from that point on the hardirq handler would
> clear ctrl->cmd_busy.  However I think the bug may have manifested
> itself with pciehp_poll_mode=1.
>
> It wasn't until commit 4e6a13356f1c ("PCI: pciehp: Deduplicate presence
> check on probe & resume") that multiple consecutive Slot Control writes
> were performed on ->probe with notification disabled, so that's the
> commit which first exposed the bug with pciehp_poll_mode=0.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lukas
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> index 83a0fa119cae..8698aefc6041 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static int pcie_poll_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, int timeout)
>>   		if (slot_status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC) {
>>   			pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
>>   						   PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC);
>> +			ctrl->cmd_busy = 0;
>> +			smp_mb();
>>   			return 1;
>>   		}
>>   		msleep(10);
>> -- 
>> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-06  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-11  5:42 [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: clear cmd_busy bit when Command Completed in polling mode Liguang Zhang
2021-11-18 11:00 ` luanshi
2021-11-19 12:00 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-11-21  1:50   ` luanshi
2021-11-21  6:35     ` Lukas Wunner
2021-11-26  7:47       ` luanshi
2021-11-26 17:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-11-26 17:35   ` Lukas Wunner
2022-01-06  8:55   ` luanshi [this message]
2022-02-03 19:07   ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-03 20:38     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a40adbb-bb83-701e-c2eb-0f80b618f159@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ameynarkhede03@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).