Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
To: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, "kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 04/11] PCI: designware-ep: Modify MSI and MSIX CAP way of finding
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 02:33:02 +0000
Message-ID: <AM5PR04MB3299B21AD6EA6C12FE6EEC23F5B90@AM5PR04MB3299.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902150720.GO9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> Sent: 2019年9月2日 23:07
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo
> Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; M.h.
> Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy
> Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com;
> gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Z.q. Hou
> <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] PCI: designware-ep: Modify MSI and MSIX CAP
> way of finding
> 
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:09AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > Each PF of EP device should have it's own MSI or MSIX capabitily
> > struct, so create a dw_pcie_ep_func struct and remover the msi_cap
> 
> remover?

Sorry. ^_^


> 
> > and msix_cap to this struce, and manage the PFs with a list.
> 
> struce?
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > v1:
> >  - This is a new patch, to fix the issue of MSI and MSIX CAP way of
> >    finding.
> > v2:
> >  - No change.
> > v3:
> >  - No change.
> 
> This makes it look like you introduced the patch in v1 and haven't changed it
> since.
> 
> I think it's more common to have a history like this:
> 
> ---
> v3:
>  - Introduced new patch, to fix the issue of MSI and MSIX CAP way of
>    finding.

OK, thanks, I am not clear the rules, thanks a lot for your help.

Thanks 
Xiaowei

> 
> 
> >
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 135
> +++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h    |  18 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > index c3bc7bd..144eb12 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,19 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_linkup(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> >  	pci_epc_linkup(epc);
> >  }
> >
> > +struct dw_pcie_ep_func *
> > +dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no) {
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(ep_func, &ep->func_list, list) {
> > +		if (ep_func->func_no == func_no)
> > +			return ep_func;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static unsigned int dw_pcie_ep_func_select(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8
> > func_no)  {
> >  	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > @@ -59,6 +72,47 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> enum pci_barno bar)
> >  		__dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, func_no, bar, 0);  }
> >
> > +static u8 __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8
> func_no,
> > +		u8 cap_ptr, u8 cap)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > +	u8 cap_id, next_cap_ptr;
> > +	u16 reg;
> > +
> > +	if (!cap_ptr)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> > +
> > +	reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, func_offset + cap_ptr);
> > +	cap_id = (reg & 0x00ff);
> > +
> > +	if (cap_id > PCI_CAP_ID_MAX)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (cap_id == cap)
> > +		return cap_ptr;
> > +
> > +	next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0xff00) >> 8;
> > +	return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(ep, func_no, next_cap_ptr, cap); }
> 
> Which tree have you based this patchset on? v5.3-rc3 and pci/dwc both
> already have this function (without the func_no). See beb4641a787d
> ("PCI: dwc: Add MSI-X callbacks handler").

There is a commit 7a6854f68 in the latest kernel.

Thanks 
Xiaowei

> 
> > +
> > +static u8 dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8
> > +func_no, u8 cap) {
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > +	u8 next_cap_ptr;
> > +	u16 reg;
> > +
> > +	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> > +
> > +	reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, func_offset + PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST);
> > +	next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0x00ff);
> > +
> > +	return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(ep, func_no, next_cap_ptr, cap); }
> > +
> >  static int dw_pcie_ep_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
> >  				   struct pci_epf_header *hdr)
> >  {
> > @@ -246,13 +300,18 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_get_msi(struct pci_epc
> *epc, u8 func_no)
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> >  	u32 val, reg;
> >  	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> >
> > -	if (!ep->msi_cap)
> > +	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, func_no);
> > +	if (!ep_func)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (!ep_func->msi_cap)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> >
> > -	reg = ep->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> > +	reg = ep_func->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> >  	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	if (!(val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -268,13 +327,18 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc
> *epc, u8 func_no, u8 interrupts)
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> >  	u32 val, reg;
> >  	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> > +
> > +	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, func_no);
> > +	if (!ep_func)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -	if (!ep->msi_cap)
> > +	if (!ep_func->msi_cap)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> >
> > -	reg = ep->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> > +	reg = ep_func->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> >  	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	val &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK;
> >  	val |= (interrupts << 1) & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK; @@ -291,13 +355,18
> > @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_get_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no)
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> >  	u32 val, reg;
> >  	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> > +
> > +	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, func_no);
> > +	if (!ep_func)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -	if (!ep->msix_cap)
> > +	if (!ep_func->msix_cap)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> >
> > -	reg = ep->msix_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS;
> > +	reg = ep_func->msix_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS;
> >  	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	if (!(val & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -313,13 +382,18 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msix(struct pci_epc
> *epc, u8 func_no, u16 interrupts)
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> >  	u32 val, reg;
> >  	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> >
> > -	if (!ep->msix_cap)
> > +	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, func_no);
> > +	if (!ep_func)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (!ep_func->msix_cap)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> >
> > -	reg = ep->msix_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS;
> > +	reg = ep_func->msix_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS;
> >  	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	val &= ~PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE;
> >  	val |= interrupts;
> > @@ -404,6 +478,7 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep
> *ep, u8 func_no,
> >  			     u8 interrupt_num)
> >  {
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> >  	struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc;
> >  	unsigned int aligned_offset;
> >  	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > @@ -413,25 +488,29 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct
> dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> >  	bool has_upper;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > -	if (!ep->msi_cap)
> > +	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, func_no);
> > +	if (!ep_func)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (!ep_func->msi_cap)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> >
> >  	/* Raise MSI per the PCI Local Bus Specification Revision 3.0, 6.8.1. */
> > -	reg = ep->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> > +	reg = ep_func->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> >  	msg_ctrl = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	has_upper = !!(msg_ctrl & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT);
> > -	reg = ep->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO;
> > +	reg = ep_func->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO;
> >  	msg_addr_lower = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	if (has_upper) {
> > -		reg = ep->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI;
> > +		reg = ep_func->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI;
> >  		msg_addr_upper = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg);
> > -		reg = ep->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_DATA_64;
> > +		reg = ep_func->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_DATA_64;
> >  		msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	} else {
> >  		msg_addr_upper = 0;
> > -		reg = ep->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_DATA_32;
> > +		reg = ep_func->msi_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSI_DATA_32;
> >  		msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	}
> >  	aligned_offset = msg_addr_lower & (epc->mem->page_size - 1); @@
> > -467,6 +546,7 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> u8 func_no,
> >  			      u16 interrupt_num)
> >  {
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> >  	struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc;
> >  	u16 tbl_offset, bir;
> >  	unsigned int func_offset = 0;
> > @@ -477,9 +557,16 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep
> *ep, u8 func_no,
> >  	void __iomem *msix_tbl;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > +	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, func_no);
> > +	if (!ep_func)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (!ep_func->msix_cap)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >  	func_offset = dw_pcie_ep_func_select(ep, func_no);
> >
> > -	reg = ep->msix_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSIX_TABLE;
> > +	reg = ep_func->msix_cap + func_offset + PCI_MSIX_TABLE;
> >  	tbl_offset = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg);
> >  	bir = (tbl_offset & PCI_MSIX_TABLE_BIR);
> >  	tbl_offset &= PCI_MSIX_TABLE_OFFSET; @@ -558,6 +645,7 @@ int
> > dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> >  	int i;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	u32 reg;
> > +	u8 func_no;
> >  	void *addr;
> >  	unsigned int nbars;
> >  	unsigned int offset;
> > @@ -565,6 +653,9 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> >  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> >  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > +	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
> > +
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->func_list);
> >
> >  	if (!pci->dbi_base || !pci->dbi_base2) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "dbi_base/dbi_base2 is not populated\n"); @@ -624,9
> > +715,19 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> >  		epc->max_functions = 1;
> >
> > -	ep->msi_cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> > +	for (func_no = 0; func_no < epc->max_functions; func_no++) {
> > +		ep_func = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ep_func), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (!ep_func)
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -	ep->msix_cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
> > +		ep_func->func_no = func_no;
> > +		ep_func->msi_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(ep, func_no,
> > +							      PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> > +		ep_func->msix_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(ep, func_no,
> > +							       PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
> > +
> > +		list_add_tail(&ep_func->list, &ep->func_list);
> > +	}
> 
> Whilst your patch addresses the issue of giving each function the ability to
> have differing capabilities - I feel that this solution doesn't go deep enough.
> 
> In my view the root issue here is that 'struct dw_pcie_ep' represents both a
> EP controller and a *single* EP function. I think that there should be a
> representation for an EP controller and a representation for a EP function (i.e.
> some separation). Thus allowing one EP controller to have many EP functions.
> This isn't too dissimilar to host bridges and their functions.
> Others here may have different views.
> 
> It may be unlikely now, but EP functions belonging to the same bit of IP may
> have differing functionality - your approach addresses that for MSI/MSI
> capabilities, but what about other differences?

Sorry, I am not clear about the other differences is? are there have any defect?

> 
> (It would be really nice as well if an EP controller could provide config
> read/write ops such that existing functions in the core such as
> __pci_find_next_capability could be reused - instead of copying them like
> dw_pcie_ep_find_capability. However I don't think this is feasible.)

Yes, agree you viewpoint, but this is the best way that I can thought ^_^,
may be others can give the best solution.

Thanks
Xiaowei

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Murray
> 
> >
> >  	if (ep->ops->ep_init)
> >  		ep->ops->ep_init(ep);
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > index 56789be..a57743c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > @@ -221,8 +221,16 @@ struct dw_pcie_ep_ops {
> >  	unsigned int (*func_conf_select)(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no);
> > };
> >
> > +struct dw_pcie_ep_func {
> > +	struct list_head	list;
> > +	u8			func_no;
> > +	u8			msi_cap;	/* MSI capability offset */
> > +	u8			msix_cap;	/* MSI-X capability offset */
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct dw_pcie_ep {
> >  	struct pci_epc		*epc;
> > +	struct list_head	func_list;
> >  	const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops *ops;
> >  	phys_addr_t		phys_base;
> >  	size_t			addr_size;
> > @@ -235,8 +243,6 @@ struct dw_pcie_ep {
> >  	u32			num_ob_windows;
> >  	void __iomem		*msi_mem;
> >  	phys_addr_t		msi_mem_phys;
> > -	u8			msi_cap;	/* MSI capability offset */
> > -	u8			msix_cap;	/* MSI-X capability offset */
> >  };
> >
> >  struct dw_pcie_ops {
> > @@ -425,6 +431,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep
> > *ep, u8 func_no,  int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell(struct
> dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> >  				       u16 interrupt_num);
> >  void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar);
> > +struct dw_pcie_ep_func *
> > +dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no);
> >  #else
> >  static inline void dw_pcie_ep_linkup(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)  { @@
> > -466,5 +474,11 @@ static inline int
> > dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,  static
> > inline void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno
> > bar)  {  }
> > +
> > +struct dw_pcie_ep_func *
> > +dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no) {
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> >  #endif
> >  #endif /* _PCIE_DESIGNWARE_H */
> > --
> > 2.9.5
> >

  reply index

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-02  3:17 [PATCH v3 00/11] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] PCI: designware-ep: Add multiple PFs support for DWC Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 16:26   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  3:43     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-26 10:29       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-26 13:38         ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] PCI: designware-ep: Add the doorbell mode of MSI-X in EP mode Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] PCI: designware-ep: Move the function of getting MSI capability forward Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] PCI: designware-ep: Modify MSI and MSIX CAP way of finding Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 15:07   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  2:33     ` Xiaowei Bao [this message]
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] dt-bindings: pci: layerscape-pci: add compatible strings for ls1088a and ls2088a Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:31   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  1:33     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] PCI: layerscape: Fix some format issue of the code Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 13:37   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  2:13     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] PCI: layerscape: Modify the MSIX to the doorbell mode Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:01   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-12 11:24     ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-09-14  6:37       ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-16  8:54         ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:46   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  1:47     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-12 12:49       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-14  4:10         ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-16 14:37           ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-18  3:17             ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] arm64: dts: layerscape: Add PCIe EP node for ls1088a Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 13:06   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  2:01     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-12 13:01       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-14  4:15         ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:54   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  1:52     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-12 12:59       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-14  4:13         ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:52 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Z.q. Hou
2019-09-02  3:54   ` Xiaowei Bao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM5PR04MB3299B21AD6EA6C12FE6EEC23F5B90@AM5PR04MB3299.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=xiaowei.bao@nxp.com \
    --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=minghuan.lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/0 linux-pci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pci linux-pci/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci \
		linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pci

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git