Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Sean V Kelley" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
To: "Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, tony.luck@intel.com,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:00:11 -0700
Message-ID: <BBEF2C05-521A-42D9-9AA4-F0B537E063F5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727150426.00005cde@huawei.com>

On 27 Jul 2020, at 7:04, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:22:18 -0700
> Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>>
>> Currently the kernel does not handle AER errors for Root Complex 
>> integrated
>> End Points (RCiEPs)[0]. These devices sit on a root bus within the 
>> Root Complex
>> (RC). AER handling is performed by a Root Complex Event Collector 
>> (RCEC) [1]
>> which is a effectively a type of RCiEP on the same root bus.
>>
>> For an RCEC (technically not a Bridge), error messages "received" 
>> from
>> associated RCiEPs must be enabled for "transmission" in order to 
>> cause a
>> System Error via the Root Control register or (when the Advanced 
>> Error
>> Reporting Capability is present) reporting via the Root Error Command
>> register and logging in the Root Error Status register and Error 
>> Source
>> Identification register.
>>
>> In addition to the defined OS level handling of the reset flow for 
>> the
>> associated RCiEPs of an RCEC, it is possible to also have a firmware 
>> first
>> model. In that case there is no need to take any actions on the RCEC 
>> because
>> the firmware is responsible for them. This is true where APEI [2] is 
>> used
>> to report the AER errors via a GHES[v2] HEST entry [3] and relevant
>> AER CPER record [4] and Firmware First handling is in use.
>>
>> We effectively end up with two different types of discovery for
>> purposes of handling AER errors:
>>
>> 1) Normal bus walk - we pass the downstream port above a bus to which
>> the device is attached and it walks everything below that point.
>>
>> 2) An RCiEP with no visible association with an RCEC as there is no 
>> need to
>> walk devices. In that case, the flow is to just call the callbacks 
>> for the actual
>> device.
>>
>> A new walk function, similar to pci_bus_walk is provided that takes a 
>> pci_dev
>> instead of a bus. If that dev corresponds to a downstream port it 
>> will walk
>> the subordinate bus of that downstream port. If the dev does not then 
>> it
>> will call the function on that device alone.
>>
>> [0] ACPI PCI Express Base Specification 5.0-1 1.3.2.3 Root Complex 
>> Integrated
>>     Endpoint Rules.
>> [1] ACPI PCI Express Base Specification 5.0-1 6.2 Error Signalling 
>> and Logging
>> [2] ACPI Specification 6.3 Chapter 18 ACPI Platform Error Interface 
>> (APEI)
>> [3] ACPI Specification 6.3 18.2.3.7 Generic Hardware Error Source
>> [4] UEFI Specification 2.8, N.2.7 PCI Express Error Section
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
>> ---
> ...
>
>
>>  	pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast resume message\n");
>> -	pci_walk_bus(bus, report_resume, &status);
>> +	pci_walk_dev_affected(dev, report_resume, &status);
>>
>> -	pci_aer_clear_device_status(dev);
>> -	pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
>
> This code had changed a little in Bjorn's pci/next branch so do a 
> rebase on that
> before v2.

Will ensure rebase includes pci/next.

Thanks,

Sean

>
>> +	if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
>> +	     pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||
>> +	     pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)) {
>> +		pci_aer_clear_device_status(dev);
>> +		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
>> +	}
>>  	pci_info(dev, "device recovery successful\n");
>>  	return status;
>>

  reply index

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24 17:22 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] pci_ids: Add class code and extended capability for RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 10:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 10:21     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:22       ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] PCI: Extend Root Port Driver to support RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:05     ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] PCI/portdrv: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to walk RCiEPs associated with RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 10:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:21     ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 14:58     ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 14:04   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:00     ` Sean V Kelley [this message]
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] PCI/AER: Apply function level reset to RCiEP on fatal error Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 13:27     ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2020-07-28 16:14       ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-28 17:02         ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 17:42           ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] PCI: Add 'rcec' field to pci_dev for associated RCiEPs Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:39     ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 16:11     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 16:28       ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER handling Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:22   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:19     ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 17:14       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] PCI/PME: Add RCEC PME handling Sean V Kelley
2020-08-04  8:35   ` Jay Fang
2020-08-04  9:47     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 14:56   ` Sean V Kelley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BBEF2C05-521A-42D9-9AA4-F0B537E063F5@intel.com \
    --to=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/0 linux-pci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pci linux-pci/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci \
		linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pci

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git