[PATCH v2 00/15] PCI/MSI: Getting rid of msi_controller, and other cleanups

[PATCH v2 00/15] PCI/MSI: Getting rid of msi_controller, and other cleanups

[Marc Zyngier]

This is a respin of the series described at [1].

* From v1:
  - Extracted the changes dealing with the MSI capture address
    for rcar and xilinx and moved them to separate patches
  - Changed the rcar code to cope with c4e0fec2f7ee ("PCI: rcar: Always
    allocate MSI addresses in 32bit space")
  - Fixed rcar resume code
  - Reworked commit messages
  - Rebased onto v5.12-rc4
  - Collected Acks, and TBs, with thanks.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210225151023.3642391-1-maz@kernel.org

Marc Zyngier (13):
  PCI: tegra: Convert to MSI domains
  PCI: rcar: Don't allocate extra memory for the MSI capture address
  PCI: rcar: Convert to MSI domains
  PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the MSI capture address
  PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains
  PCI: hv: Drop msi_controller structure
  PCI/MSI: Drop use of msi_controller from core code
  PCI/MSI: Kill msi_controller structure
  PCI/MSI: Kill default_teardown_msi_irqs()
  PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their reliance on MSI domains
  PCI/MSI: Make pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI
    domains
  PCI/MSI: Document the various ways of ending up with NO_MSI
  PCI: Refactor HT advertising of NO_MSI flag

Thomas Gleixner (2):
  PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their lack of MSI handling
  PCI: mediatek: Advertise lack of MSI handling

 drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig           |   4 +-
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c |   1 +
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c      |   4 -
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c       | 343 ++++++++++++----------
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c   |   4 +
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c  | 356 +++++++++++------------
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c     | 238 ++++++---------
 drivers/pci/msi.c                        |  46 +--
 drivers/pci/probe.c                      |   4 +-
 drivers/pci/quirks.c                     |  15 +-
 include/linux/msi.h                      |  17 +-
 include/linux/pci.h                      |   4 +-
 12 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 559 deletions(-)

-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 01/15] PCI: tegra: Convert to MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

In anticipation of the removal of the msi_controller structure, convert
the Tegra host controller driver to MSI domains.

We end-up with the usual two domain structure, the top one being a
generic PCI/MSI domain, the bottom one being Tegra-specific and handling
the actual HW interrupt allocation.

While at it, convert the normal interrupt handler to a chained handler,
handle the controller's MSI IRQ edge triggered, support multiple MSIs
per device and use the AFI_MSI_EN_VEC* registers to provide MSI masking.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
[treding@nvidia.com: fix, clean up and address TODOs from Marc's draft]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig     |   1 -
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
index 5aa8977d7b0f..be8f9ff512a0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ config PCI_TEGRA
 	bool "NVIDIA Tegra PCIe controller"
 	depends on ARCH_TEGRA || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
-	select PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
 	help
 	  Say Y here if you want support for the PCIe host controller found
 	  on NVIDIA Tegra SoCs.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
index 8fcabed7c6a6..eaba7b2fab4a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
@@ -78,23 +79,8 @@
 #define AFI_MSI_FPCI_BAR_ST	0x64
 #define AFI_MSI_AXI_BAR_ST	0x68
 
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC0		0x6c
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC1		0x70
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC2		0x74
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC3		0x78
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC4		0x7c
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC5		0x80
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC6		0x84
-#define AFI_MSI_VEC7		0x88
-
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC0		0x8c
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC1		0x90
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC2		0x94
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC3		0x98
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC4		0x9c
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC5		0xa0
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC6		0xa4
-#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC7		0xa8
+#define AFI_MSI_VEC(x)		(0x6c + ((x) * 4))
+#define AFI_MSI_EN_VEC(x)	(0x8c + ((x) * 4))
 
 #define AFI_CONFIGURATION		0xac
 #define  AFI_CONFIGURATION_EN_FPCI		(1 << 0)
@@ -280,10 +266,10 @@
 #define LINK_RETRAIN_TIMEOUT 100000 /* in usec */
 
 struct tegra_msi {
-	struct msi_controller chip;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
-	struct mutex lock;
+	struct mutex map_lock;
+	spinlock_t mask_lock;
 	void *virt;
 	dma_addr_t phys;
 	int irq;
@@ -333,11 +319,6 @@ struct tegra_pcie_soc {
 	} ectl;
 };
 
-static inline struct tegra_msi *to_tegra_msi(struct msi_controller *chip)
-{
-	return container_of(chip, struct tegra_msi, chip);
-}
-
 struct tegra_pcie {
 	struct device *dev;
 
@@ -372,6 +353,11 @@ struct tegra_pcie {
 	struct dentry *debugfs;
 };
 
+static inline struct tegra_pcie *msi_to_pcie(struct tegra_msi *msi)
+{
+	return container_of(msi, struct tegra_pcie, msi);
+}
+
 struct tegra_pcie_port {
 	struct tegra_pcie *pcie;
 	struct device_node *np;
@@ -1432,7 +1418,6 @@ static void tegra_pcie_phys_put(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 	}
 }
 
-
 static int tegra_pcie_get_resources(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 {
 	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
@@ -1509,6 +1494,7 @@ static int tegra_pcie_get_resources(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 phys_put:
 	if (soc->program_uphy)
 		tegra_pcie_phys_put(pcie);
+
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -1551,161 +1537,227 @@ static void tegra_pcie_pme_turnoff(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
 	afi_writel(pcie, val, AFI_PCIE_PME);
 }
 
-static int tegra_msi_alloc(struct tegra_msi *chip)
-{
-	int msi;
-
-	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
-
-	msi = find_first_zero_bit(chip->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
-	if (msi < INT_PCI_MSI_NR)
-		set_bit(msi, chip->used);
-	else
-		msi = -ENOSPC;
-
-	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
-
-	return msi;
-}
-
-static void tegra_msi_free(struct tegra_msi *chip, unsigned long irq)
+static void tegra_pcie_msi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
-	struct device *dev = chip->chip.dev;
-
-	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
-
-	if (!test_bit(irq, chip->used))
-		dev_err(dev, "trying to free unused MSI#%lu\n", irq);
-	else
-		clear_bit(irq, chip->used);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
-}
-
-static irqreturn_t tegra_pcie_msi_irq(int irq, void *data)
-{
-	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = data;
-	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
+	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
 	struct tegra_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
-	unsigned int i, processed = 0;
+	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
-		unsigned long reg = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_MSI_VEC0 + i * 4);
+		unsigned long reg = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_MSI_VEC(i));
 
 		while (reg) {
 			unsigned int offset = find_first_bit(&reg, 32);
 			unsigned int index = i * 32 + offset;
 			unsigned int irq;
 
-			/* clear the interrupt */
-			afi_writel(pcie, 1 << offset, AFI_MSI_VEC0 + i * 4);
-
-			irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain, index);
+			irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain->parent, index);
 			if (irq) {
-				if (test_bit(index, msi->used))
-					generic_handle_irq(irq);
-				else
-					dev_info(dev, "unhandled MSI\n");
+				generic_handle_irq(irq);
 			} else {
 				/*
 				 * that's weird who triggered this?
 				 * just clear it
 				 */
 				dev_info(dev, "unexpected MSI\n");
+				afi_writel(pcie, BIT(index % 32), AFI_MSI_VEC(index));
 			}
 
 			/* see if there's any more pending in this vector */
-			reg = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_MSI_VEC0 + i * 4);
-
-			processed++;
+			reg = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_MSI_VEC(i));
 		}
 	}
 
-	return processed > 0 ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
+	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
 }
 
-static int tegra_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
-			       struct pci_dev *pdev, struct msi_desc *desc)
+static void tegra_msi_top_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	struct tegra_msi *msi = to_tegra_msi(chip);
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-	unsigned int irq;
-	int hwirq;
+	irq_chip_ack_parent(d);
+}
 
-	hwirq = tegra_msi_alloc(msi);
-	if (hwirq < 0)
-		return hwirq;
+static void tegra_msi_top_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
+	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
+}
 
-	irq = irq_create_mapping(msi->domain, hwirq);
-	if (!irq) {
-		tegra_msi_free(msi, hwirq);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+static void tegra_msi_top_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
+	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip tegra_msi_top_chip = {
+	.name		= "tegra PCIe MSI",
+	.irq_ack	= tegra_msi_top_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask	= tegra_msi_top_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask	= tegra_msi_top_irq_unmask,
+};
 
-	irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
+static void tegra_msi_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct tegra_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = msi_to_pcie(msi);
+	unsigned int index = d->hwirq / 32;
 
-	msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi->phys);
-	msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi->phys);
-	msg.data = hwirq;
+	/* clear the interrupt */
+	afi_writel(pcie, BIT(d->hwirq % 32), AFI_MSI_VEC(index));
+}
 
-	pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
+static void tegra_msi_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct tegra_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = msi_to_pcie(msi);
+	unsigned int index = d->hwirq / 32;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 value;
 
-	return 0;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
+	value = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC(index));
+	value &= ~BIT(d->hwirq % 32);
+	afi_writel(pcie, value, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC(index));
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void tegra_msi_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct tegra_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = msi_to_pcie(msi);
+	unsigned int index = d->hwirq / 32;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 value;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
+	value = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC(index));
+	value |= BIT(d->hwirq % 32);
+	afi_writel(pcie, value, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC(index));
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int tegra_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static void tegra_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
-				   unsigned int irq)
+static void tegra_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
-	struct tegra_msi *msi = to_tegra_msi(chip);
-	struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
-	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+	struct tegra_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
 
-	irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
-	tegra_msi_free(msi, hwirq);
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi->phys);
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi->phys);
+	msg->data = data->hwirq;
 }
 
-static struct irq_chip tegra_msi_irq_chip = {
-	.name = "Tegra PCIe MSI",
-	.irq_enable = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
-	.irq_disable = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
+static struct irq_chip tegra_msi_bottom_chip = {
+	.name			= "Tegra MSI",
+	.irq_ack		= tegra_msi_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask		= tegra_msi_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask		= tegra_msi_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_set_affinity 	= tegra_msi_set_affinity,
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= tegra_compose_msi_msg,
 };
 
-static int tegra_msi_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
-			 irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+static int tegra_msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				  unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
 {
-	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &tegra_msi_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
+	struct tegra_msi *msi = domain->host_data;
+	unsigned int i;
+	int hwirq;
+
+	mutex_lock(&msi->map_lock);
+
+	hwirq = bitmap_find_free_region(msi->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR, order_base_2(nr_irqs));
+
+	mutex_unlock(&msi->map_lock);
+
+	if (hwirq < 0)
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
+		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
+				    &tegra_msi_bottom_chip, domain->host_data,
+				    handle_edge_irq, NULL, NULL);
 
 	tegra_cpuidle_pcie_irqs_in_use();
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
-	.map = tegra_msi_map,
+static void tegra_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				  unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+	struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+	struct tegra_msi *msi = domain->host_data;
+
+	mutex_lock(&msi->map_lock);
+
+	bitmap_release_region(msi->used, d->hwirq, order_base_2(nr_irqs));
+
+	mutex_unlock(&msi->map_lock);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops tegra_msi_domain_ops = {
+	.alloc = tegra_msi_domain_alloc,
+	.free = tegra_msi_domain_free,
+};
+
+static struct msi_domain_info tegra_msi_info = {
+	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
+		   MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
+	.chip	= &tegra_msi_top_chip,
 };
 
+static int tegra_allocate_domains(struct tegra_msi *msi)
+{
+	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = msi_to_pcie(msi);
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(pcie->dev);
+	struct irq_domain *parent;
+
+	parent = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, INT_PCI_MSI_NR,
+					  &tegra_msi_domain_ops, msi);
+	if (!parent) {
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	irq_domain_update_bus_token(parent, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
+
+	msi->domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, &tegra_msi_info, parent);
+	if (!msi->domain) {
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
+		irq_domain_remove(parent);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void tegra_free_domains(struct tegra_msi *msi)
+{
+	struct irq_domain *parent = msi->domain->parent;
+
+	irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
+	irq_domain_remove(parent);
+}
+
 static int tegra_pcie_msi_setup(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 {
-	struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pcie->dev);
 	struct tegra_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
 	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
 	int err;
 
-	mutex_init(&msi->lock);
-
-	msi->chip.dev = dev;
-	msi->chip.setup_irq = tegra_msi_setup_irq;
-	msi->chip.teardown_irq = tegra_msi_teardown_irq;
+	mutex_init(&msi->map_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&msi->mask_lock);
 
-	msi->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node, INT_PCI_MSI_NR,
-					    &msi_domain_ops, &msi->chip);
-	if (!msi->domain) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
+		err = tegra_allocate_domains(msi);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 	}
 
 	err = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi");
@@ -1714,12 +1766,7 @@ static int tegra_pcie_msi_setup(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 
 	msi->irq = err;
 
-	err = request_irq(msi->irq, tegra_pcie_msi_irq, IRQF_NO_THREAD,
-			  tegra_msi_irq_chip.name, pcie);
-	if (err < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
-		goto free_irq_domain;
-	}
+	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(msi->irq, tegra_pcie_msi_irq, pcie);
 
 	/* Though the PCIe controller can address >32-bit address space, to
 	 * facilitate endpoints that support only 32-bit MSI target address,
@@ -1740,14 +1787,14 @@ static int tegra_pcie_msi_setup(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 		goto free_irq;
 	}
 
-	host->msi = &msi->chip;
-
 	return 0;
 
 free_irq:
-	free_irq(msi->irq, pcie);
+	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(msi->irq, NULL, NULL);
 free_irq_domain:
-	irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
+		tegra_free_domains(msi);
+
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -1762,16 +1809,6 @@ static void tegra_pcie_enable_msi(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 	/* this register is in 4K increments */
 	afi_writel(pcie, 1, AFI_MSI_BAR_SZ);
 
-	/* enable all MSI vectors */
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC0);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC1);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC2);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC3);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC4);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC5);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC6);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0xffffffff, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC7);
-
 	/* and unmask the MSI interrupt */
 	reg = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_INTR_MASK);
 	reg |= AFI_INTR_MASK_MSI_MASK;
@@ -1786,16 +1823,16 @@ static void tegra_pcie_msi_teardown(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 	dma_free_attrs(pcie->dev, PAGE_SIZE, msi->virt, msi->phys,
 		       DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING);
 
-	if (msi->irq > 0)
-		free_irq(msi->irq, pcie);
-
 	for (i = 0; i < INT_PCI_MSI_NR; i++) {
 		irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain, i);
 		if (irq > 0)
-			irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
+			irq_domain_free_irqs(irq, 1);
 	}
 
-	irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
+	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(msi->irq, NULL, NULL);
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
+		tegra_free_domains(msi);
 }
 
 static int tegra_pcie_disable_msi(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
@@ -1807,16 +1844,6 @@ static int tegra_pcie_disable_msi(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
 	value &= ~AFI_INTR_MASK_MSI_MASK;
 	afi_writel(pcie, value, AFI_INTR_MASK);
 
-	/* disable all MSI vectors */
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC0);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC1);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC2);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC3);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC4);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC5);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC6);
-	afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_MSI_EN_VEC7);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 02/15] PCI: rcar: Don't allocate extra memory for the MSI capture address

[Marc Zyngier]

A long cargo-culted behaviour of PCI drivers is to allocate memory
to obtain an address that is fed to the controller as the MSI
capture address (i.e. the MSI doorbell).

But there is no actual requirement for this address to be RAM.
All it needs to be is a suitable aligned address that will
*not* be DMA'd to.

Since the rcar platform already has a requirement that this
address should be in the first 4GB of the physical address space,
use the controller's own base address as the capture address.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c | 18 +++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
index a728e8f9ad3c..ce952403e22c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ struct rcar_msi {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
 	struct msi_controller chip;
-	unsigned long pages;
 	struct mutex lock;
 	int irq1;
 	int irq2;
@@ -680,14 +679,15 @@ static void rcar_pcie_unmap_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 static void rcar_pcie_hw_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 {
 	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &host->pcie;
-	struct rcar_msi *msi = &host->msi;
-	unsigned long base;
+	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
+	struct resource res;
 
-	/* setup MSI data target */
-	base = virt_to_phys((void *)msi->pages);
+	if (WARN_ON(of_address_to_resource(dev->of_node, 0, &res)))
+		return;
 
-	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, lower_32_bits(base) | MSIFE, PCIEMSIALR);
-	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, upper_32_bits(base), PCIEMSIAUR);
+	/* setup MSI data target */
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, lower_32_bits(res.start) | MSIFE, PCIEMSIALR);
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, upper_32_bits(res.start), PCIEMSIAUR);
 
 	/* enable all MSI interrupts */
 	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 0xffffffff, PCIEMSIIER);
@@ -735,7 +735,6 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 	}
 
 	/* setup MSI data target */
-	msi->pages = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA32, 0);
 	rcar_pcie_hw_enable_msi(host);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -748,7 +747,6 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 static void rcar_pcie_teardown_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 {
 	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &host->pcie;
-	struct rcar_msi *msi = &host->msi;
 
 	/* Disable all MSI interrupts */
 	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 0, PCIEMSIIER);
@@ -756,8 +754,6 @@ static void rcar_pcie_teardown_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 	/* Disable address decoding of the MSI interrupt, MSIFE */
 	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 0, PCIEMSIALR);
 
-	free_pages(msi->pages, 0);
-
 	rcar_pcie_unmap_msi(host);
 }
 
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 03/15] PCI: rcar: Convert to MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

In anticipation of the removal of the msi_controller structure, convert
the Rcar host controller driver to MSI domains.

We end-up with the usual two domain structure, the top one being a
generic PCI/MSI domain, the bottom one being Rcar-specific and handling
the actual HW interrupt allocation.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig          |   1 -
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c | 352 ++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
index be8f9ff512a0..5cc07d28a3a0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ config PCIE_RCAR_HOST
 	bool "Renesas R-Car PCIe host controller"
 	depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
-	select PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
 	help
 	  Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on R-Car SoCs in host
 	  mode.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
index ce952403e22c..f7331ad0d6dc 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
@@ -35,17 +35,12 @@
 struct rcar_msi {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
-	struct msi_controller chip;
-	struct mutex lock;
+	struct mutex map_lock;
+	spinlock_t mask_lock;
 	int irq1;
 	int irq2;
 };
 
-static inline struct rcar_msi *to_rcar_msi(struct msi_controller *chip)
-{
-	return container_of(chip, struct rcar_msi, chip);
-}
-
 /* Structure representing the PCIe interface */
 struct rcar_pcie_host {
 	struct rcar_pcie	pcie;
@@ -55,6 +50,11 @@ struct rcar_pcie_host {
 	int			(*phy_init_fn)(struct rcar_pcie_host *host);
 };
 
+static struct rcar_pcie_host *msi_to_host(struct rcar_msi *msi)
+{
+	return container_of(msi, struct rcar_pcie_host, msi);
+}
+
 static u32 rcar_read_conf(struct rcar_pcie *pcie, int where)
 {
 	unsigned int shift = BITS_PER_BYTE * (where & 3);
@@ -291,8 +291,6 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 
 	bridge->sysdata = host;
 	bridge->ops = &rcar_pcie_ops;
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
-		bridge->msi = &host->msi.chip;
 
 	return pci_host_probe(bridge);
 }
@@ -472,42 +470,6 @@ static int rcar_pcie_phy_init_gen3(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int rcar_msi_alloc(struct rcar_msi *chip)
-{
-	int msi;
-
-	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
-
-	msi = find_first_zero_bit(chip->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
-	if (msi < INT_PCI_MSI_NR)
-		set_bit(msi, chip->used);
-	else
-		msi = -ENOSPC;
-
-	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
-
-	return msi;
-}
-
-static int rcar_msi_alloc_region(struct rcar_msi *chip, int no_irqs)
-{
-	int msi;
-
-	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
-	msi = bitmap_find_free_region(chip->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR,
-				      order_base_2(no_irqs));
-	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
-
-	return msi;
-}
-
-static void rcar_msi_free(struct rcar_msi *chip, unsigned long irq)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
-	clear_bit(irq, chip->used);
-	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
-}
-
 static irqreturn_t rcar_pcie_msi_irq(int irq, void *data)
 {
 	struct rcar_pcie_host *host = data;
@@ -526,18 +488,13 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_pcie_msi_irq(int irq, void *data)
 		unsigned int index = find_first_bit(&reg, 32);
 		unsigned int msi_irq;
 
-		/* clear the interrupt */
-		rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 1 << index, PCIEMSIFR);
-
-		msi_irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain, index);
+		msi_irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain->parent, index);
 		if (msi_irq) {
-			if (test_bit(index, msi->used))
-				generic_handle_irq(msi_irq);
-			else
-				dev_info(dev, "unhandled MSI\n");
+			generic_handle_irq(msi_irq);
 		} else {
 			/* Unknown MSI, just clear it */
 			dev_dbg(dev, "unexpected MSI\n");
+			rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, BIT(index), PCIEMSIFR);
 		}
 
 		/* see if there's any more pending in this vector */
@@ -547,150 +504,170 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_pcie_msi_irq(int irq, void *data)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-static int rcar_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
-			      struct msi_desc *desc)
+static void rcar_msi_top_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	struct rcar_msi *msi = to_rcar_msi(chip);
-	struct rcar_pcie_host *host = container_of(chip, struct rcar_pcie_host,
-						   msi.chip);
-	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &host->pcie;
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-	unsigned int irq;
-	int hwirq;
+	irq_chip_ack_parent(d);
+}
 
-	hwirq = rcar_msi_alloc(msi);
-	if (hwirq < 0)
-		return hwirq;
+static void rcar_msi_top_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
+	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
+}
 
-	irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain, hwirq);
-	if (!irq) {
-		rcar_msi_free(msi, hwirq);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+static void rcar_msi_top_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
+	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
+}
 
-	irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
+static struct irq_chip rcar_msi_top_chip = {
+	.name		= "PCIe MSI",
+	.irq_ack	= rcar_msi_top_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask	= rcar_msi_top_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask	= rcar_msi_top_irq_unmask,
+};
 
-	msg.address_lo = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIALR) & ~MSIFE;
-	msg.address_hi = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIAUR);
-	msg.data = hwirq;
+static void rcar_msi_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct rcar_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &msi_to_host(msi)->pcie;
 
-	pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
+	/* clear the interrupt */
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, BIT(d->hwirq), PCIEMSIFR);
+}
 
-	return 0;
+static void rcar_msi_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct rcar_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &msi_to_host(msi)->pcie;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 value;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
+	value = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIIER);
+	value &= ~BIT(d->hwirq);
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, value, PCIEMSIIER);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static int rcar_msi_setup_irqs(struct msi_controller *chip,
-			       struct pci_dev *pdev, int nvec, int type)
+static void rcar_msi_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	struct rcar_msi *msi = to_rcar_msi(chip);
-	struct rcar_pcie_host *host = container_of(chip, struct rcar_pcie_host,
-						   msi.chip);
-	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &host->pcie;
-	struct msi_desc *desc;
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-	unsigned int irq;
-	int hwirq;
-	int i;
+	struct rcar_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &msi_to_host(msi)->pcie;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 value;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
+	value = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIIER);
+	value |= BIT(d->hwirq);
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, value, PCIEMSIIER);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msi->mask_lock, flags);
+}
 
-	/* MSI-X interrupts are not supported */
-	if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX)
-		return -EINVAL;
+static int rcar_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
 
-	WARN_ON(!list_is_singular(&pdev->dev.msi_list));
-	desc = list_entry(pdev->dev.msi_list.next, struct msi_desc, list);
+static void rcar_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct rcar_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	unsigned long pa = virt_to_phys(msi);
 
-	hwirq = rcar_msi_alloc_region(msi, nvec);
-	if (hwirq < 0)
-		return -ENOSPC;
+	/* Use the msi structure as the PA for the MSI doorbell */
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa);
+	msg->data = data->hwirq;
+}
 
-	irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain, hwirq);
-	if (!irq)
-		return -ENOSPC;
+static struct irq_chip rcar_msi_bottom_chip = {
+	.name			= "Rcar MSI",
+	.irq_ack		= rcar_msi_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask		= rcar_msi_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask		= rcar_msi_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_set_affinity 	= rcar_msi_set_affinity,
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= rcar_compose_msi_msg,
+};
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) {
-		/*
-		 * irq_create_mapping() called from rcar_pcie_probe() pre-
-		 * allocates descs,  so there is no need to allocate descs here.
-		 * We can therefore assume that if irq_find_mapping() above
-		 * returns non-zero, then the descs are also successfully
-		 * allocated.
-		 */
-		if (irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq, i, desc)) {
-			/* TODO: clear */
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-	}
+static int rcar_msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				  unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
+{
+	struct rcar_msi *msi = domain->host_data;
+	unsigned int i;
+	int hwirq;
+
+	mutex_lock(&msi->map_lock);
 
-	desc->nvec_used = nvec;
-	desc->msi_attrib.multiple = order_base_2(nvec);
+	hwirq = bitmap_find_free_region(msi->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR, order_base_2(nr_irqs));
 
-	msg.address_lo = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIALR) & ~MSIFE;
-	msg.address_hi = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIAUR);
-	msg.data = hwirq;
+	mutex_unlock(&msi->map_lock);
+
+	if (hwirq < 0)
+		return -ENOSPC;
 
-	pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
+		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
+				    &rcar_msi_bottom_chip, domain->host_data,
+				    handle_edge_irq, NULL, NULL);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void rcar_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
+static void rcar_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				  unsigned int nr_irqs)
 {
-	struct rcar_msi *msi = to_rcar_msi(chip);
-	struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
+	struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+	struct rcar_msi *msi = domain->host_data;
 
-	rcar_msi_free(msi, d->hwirq);
-}
-
-static struct irq_chip rcar_msi_irq_chip = {
-	.name = "R-Car PCIe MSI",
-	.irq_enable = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
-	.irq_disable = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
-};
+	mutex_lock(&msi->map_lock);
 
-static int rcar_msi_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
-			irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
-{
-	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &rcar_msi_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
+	bitmap_release_region(msi->used, d->hwirq, order_base_2(nr_irqs));
 
-	return 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&msi->map_lock);
 }
 
-static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
-	.map = rcar_msi_map,
+static const struct irq_domain_ops rcar_msi_domain_ops = {
+	.alloc	= rcar_msi_domain_alloc,
+	.free	= rcar_msi_domain_free,
+};
+
+static struct msi_domain_info rcar_msi_info = {
+	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
+		   MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI),
+	.chip	= &rcar_msi_top_chip,
 };
 
-static void rcar_pcie_unmap_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
+static int rcar_allocate_domains(struct rcar_msi *msi)
 {
-	struct rcar_msi *msi = &host->msi;
-	int i, irq;
+	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &msi_to_host(msi)->pcie;
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(pcie->dev);
+	struct irq_domain *parent;
+
+	parent = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, INT_PCI_MSI_NR,
+					  &rcar_msi_domain_ops, msi);
+	if (!parent) {
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	irq_domain_update_bus_token(parent, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < INT_PCI_MSI_NR; i++) {
-		irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain, i);
-		if (irq > 0)
-			irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
+	msi->domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, &rcar_msi_info, parent);
+	if (!msi->domain) {
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
+		irq_domain_remove(parent);
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
+	return 0;
 }
 
-static void rcar_pcie_hw_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
+static void rcar_free_domains(struct rcar_msi *msi)
 {
-	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &host->pcie;
-	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
-	struct resource res;
+	struct irq_domain *parent = msi->domain->parent;
 
-	if (WARN_ON(of_address_to_resource(dev->of_node, 0, &res)))
-		return;
-
-	/* setup MSI data target */
-	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, lower_32_bits(res.start) | MSIFE, PCIEMSIALR);
-	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, upper_32_bits(res.start), PCIEMSIAUR);
-
-	/* enable all MSI interrupts */
-	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 0xffffffff, PCIEMSIIER);
+	irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
+	irq_domain_remove(parent);
 }
 
 static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
@@ -698,29 +675,24 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 	struct rcar_pcie *pcie = &host->pcie;
 	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
 	struct rcar_msi *msi = &host->msi;
-	int err, i;
-
-	mutex_init(&msi->lock);
+	struct resource res;
+	int err;
 
-	msi->chip.dev = dev;
-	msi->chip.setup_irq = rcar_msi_setup_irq;
-	msi->chip.setup_irqs = rcar_msi_setup_irqs;
-	msi->chip.teardown_irq = rcar_msi_teardown_irq;
+	mutex_init(&msi->map_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&msi->mask_lock);
 
-	msi->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node, INT_PCI_MSI_NR,
-					    &msi_domain_ops, &msi->chip);
-	if (!msi->domain) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	err = of_address_to_resource(dev->of_node, 0, &res);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < INT_PCI_MSI_NR; i++)
-		irq_create_mapping(msi->domain, i);
+	err = rcar_allocate_domains(msi);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	/* Two irqs are for MSI, but they are also used for non-MSI irqs */
 	err = devm_request_irq(dev, msi->irq1, rcar_pcie_msi_irq,
 			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
-			       rcar_msi_irq_chip.name, host);
+			       rcar_msi_bottom_chip.name, host);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
 		goto err;
@@ -728,19 +700,26 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 
 	err = devm_request_irq(dev, msi->irq2, rcar_pcie_msi_irq,
 			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
-			       rcar_msi_irq_chip.name, host);
+			       rcar_msi_bottom_chip.name, host);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	/* setup MSI data target */
-	rcar_pcie_hw_enable_msi(host);
+	/* disable all MSIs */
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 0, PCIEMSIIER);
+
+	/*
+	 * Setup MSI data target using RC base address address, which
+	 * is guaranteed to be in the low 32bit range on any RCar HW.
+	 */
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, lower_32_bits(res.start) | MSIFE, PCIEMSIALR);
+	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, upper_32_bits(res.start), PCIEMSIAUR);
 
 	return 0;
 
 err:
-	rcar_pcie_unmap_msi(host);
+	rcar_free_domains(msi);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -754,7 +733,7 @@ static void rcar_pcie_teardown_msi(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
 	/* Disable address decoding of the MSI interrupt, MSIFE */
 	rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 0, PCIEMSIALR);
 
-	rcar_pcie_unmap_msi(host);
+	rcar_free_domains(&host->msi);
 }
 
 static int rcar_pcie_get_resources(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
@@ -1007,8 +986,17 @@ static int __maybe_unused rcar_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
 	dev_info(dev, "PCIe x%d: link up\n", (data >> 20) & 0x3f);
 
 	/* Enable MSI */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
-		rcar_pcie_hw_enable_msi(host);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
+		struct resource res;
+		u32 val;
+
+		of_address_to_resource(dev->of_node, 0, &res);
+		rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, upper_32_bits(res.start), PCIEMSIAUR);
+		rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, lower_32_bits(res.start) | MSIFE, PCIEMSIALR);
+
+		bitmap_to_arr32(&val, host->msi.used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
+		rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, val, PCIEMSIIER);
+	}
 
 	rcar_pcie_hw_enable(host);
 
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 04/15] PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the MSI capture address

[Marc Zyngier]

A long cargo-culted behaviour of PCI drivers is to allocate memory
to obtain an address that is fed to the controller as the MSI
capture address (i.e. the MSI doorbell).

But there is no actual requirement for this address to be RAM.
All it needs to be is a suitable aligned address that will
*not* be DMA'd to.

Use the physical address of the 'port' data structure as the MSI
capture address.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
index fa5baeb82653..3a762ffb0cef 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@
  * struct xilinx_pcie_port - PCIe port information
  * @reg_base: IO Mapped Register Base
  * @irq: Interrupt number
- * @msi_pages: MSI pages
  * @dev: Device pointer
  * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain pointer
  * @leg_domain: Legacy IRQ domain pointer
@@ -103,7 +102,6 @@
 struct xilinx_pcie_port {
 	void __iomem *reg_base;
 	u32 irq;
-	unsigned long msi_pages;
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
 	struct irq_domain *leg_domain;
@@ -274,10 +272,10 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
 
 	irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
 
-	msg_addr = virt_to_phys((void *)port->msi_pages);
+	msg_addr = virt_to_phys(port);
 
-	msg.address_hi = 0;
-	msg.address_lo = msg_addr;
+	msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msg_addr);
+	msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msg_addr);
 	msg.data = irq;
 
 	pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
@@ -330,13 +328,9 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
 {
 	phys_addr_t msg_addr;
 
-	port->msi_pages = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
-	if (!port->msi_pages)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	msg_addr = virt_to_phys((void *)port->msi_pages);
-	pcie_write(port, 0x0, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1);
-	pcie_write(port, msg_addr, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2);
+	msg_addr = virt_to_phys(port);
+	pcie_write(port, upper_32_bit(msg_addr), XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1);
+	pcie_write(port, lower_32_bits(msg_addr), XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.29.2

RE: [PATCH v2 04/15] PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the MSI capture address

[Bharat Kumar Gogada]

Thanks Marc for the patch.
> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/15] PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the
> MSI capture address
> 
> A long cargo-culted behaviour of PCI drivers is to allocate memory to obtain
> an address that is fed to the controller as the MSI capture address (i.e. the
> MSI doorbell).
> 
> But there is no actual requirement for this address to be RAM.
> All it needs to be is a suitable aligned address that will
> *not* be DMA'd to.
> 
> Use the physical address of the 'port' data structure as the MSI capture
> address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 18 ++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

...
> -	msg.address_hi = 0;
> -	msg.address_lo = msg_addr;
> +	msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msg_addr);
> +	msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msg_addr);

The XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2 register expects 4KB aligned address.
The lower 12-bits are always set to 0 in this register. So we need to mask the address 
while programming address to EP.

#define XILINX_PCIE_MSI_ADDR_MASK       GENMASK(31, 12)
msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msg_addr) & XILINX_PCIE_MSI_ADDR_MASK;


>  	msg.data = irq;
>

Regards,
Bharat
 

Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the MSI capture address

[Marc Zyngier]

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:35:58 +0000,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Marc for the patch.
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 04/15] PCI: xilinx: Don't allocate extra memory for the
> > MSI capture address
> > 
> > A long cargo-culted behaviour of PCI drivers is to allocate memory to obtain
> > an address that is fed to the controller as the MSI capture address (i.e. the
> > MSI doorbell).
> > 
> > But there is no actual requirement for this address to be RAM.
> > All it needs to be is a suitable aligned address that will
> > *not* be DMA'd to.
> > 
> > Use the physical address of the 'port' data structure as the MSI capture
> > address.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 18 ++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> ...
> > -	msg.address_hi = 0;
> > -	msg.address_lo = msg_addr;
> > +	msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msg_addr);
> > +	msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msg_addr);
> 
> The XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2 register expects 4KB aligned address.
> The lower 12-bits are always set to 0 in this register. So we need
> to mask the address while programming address to

Thanks for the heads up, I'll fix this up. Does it work correctly once
the address is aligned?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

[PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

In anticipation of the removal of the msi_controller structure, convert
the ancient xilinx host controller driver to MSI domains.

We end-up with the usual two domain structure, the top one being a
generic PCI/MSI domain, the bottom one being xilinx-specific and handling
the actual HW interrupt allocation.

This allows us to fix some of the most appalling MSI programming, where
the message programmed in the device is the virtual IRQ number instead
of the allocated vector number. The allocator is also made safe with
a mutex. This should allow support for MultiMSI, but I decided not to
even try, since I cannot test it.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig       |   2 +-
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 234 +++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
index 5cc07d28a3a0..60045f7aafc5 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ config PCI_HOST_GENERIC
 config PCIE_XILINX
 	bool "Xilinx AXI PCIe host bridge support"
 	depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
-	select PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
+	depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
 	help
 	  Say 'Y' here if you want kernel to support the Xilinx AXI PCIe
 	  Host Bridge driver.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
index 3a762ffb0cef..ad9abf405167 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
@@ -93,23 +93,23 @@
 /**
  * struct xilinx_pcie_port - PCIe port information
  * @reg_base: IO Mapped Register Base
- * @irq: Interrupt number
  * @dev: Device pointer
+ * @msi_map: Bitmap of allocated MSIs
+ * @map_lock: Mutex protecting the MSI allocation
  * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain pointer
  * @leg_domain: Legacy IRQ domain pointer
  * @resources: Bus Resources
  */
 struct xilinx_pcie_port {
 	void __iomem *reg_base;
-	u32 irq;
 	struct device *dev;
+	unsigned long msi_map[BITS_TO_LONGS(XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS)];
+	struct mutex map_lock;
 	struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
 	struct irq_domain *leg_domain;
 	struct list_head resources;
 };
 
-static DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS);
-
 static inline u32 pcie_read(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port, u32 reg)
 {
 	return readl(port->reg_base + reg);
@@ -194,145 +194,106 @@ static struct pci_ops xilinx_pcie_ops = {
 
 /* MSI functions */
 
-/**
- * xilinx_pcie_destroy_msi - Free MSI number
- * @irq: IRQ to be freed
- */
-static void xilinx_pcie_destroy_msi(unsigned int irq)
+static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_top_chip = {
+	.name		= "PCIe MSI",
+};
+
+static int xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
 {
-	struct msi_desc *msi;
-	struct xilinx_pcie_port *port;
-	struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
-	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
-
-	if (!test_bit(hwirq, msi_irq_in_use)) {
-		msi = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
-		port = msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(msi);
-		dev_err(port->dev, "Trying to free unused MSI#%d\n", irq);
-	} else {
-		clear_bit(hwirq, msi_irq_in_use);
-	}
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-/**
- * xilinx_pcie_assign_msi - Allocate MSI number
- *
- * Return: A valid IRQ on success and error value on failure.
- */
-static int xilinx_pcie_assign_msi(void)
+static void xilinx_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
-	int pos;
+	struct xilinx_pcie_port *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(pcie);
 
-	pos = find_first_zero_bit(msi_irq_in_use, XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS);
-	if (pos < XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS)
-		set_bit(pos, msi_irq_in_use);
-	else
-		return -ENOSPC;
-
-	return pos;
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa);
+	msg->data = data->hwirq;
 }
 
-/**
- * xilinx_msi_teardown_irq - Destroy the MSI
- * @chip: MSI Chip descriptor
- * @irq: MSI IRQ to destroy
- */
-static void xilinx_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
-				    unsigned int irq)
-{
-	xilinx_pcie_destroy_msi(irq);
-	irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
-}
+static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_bottom_chip = {
+	.name			= "Xilinx MSI",
+	.irq_set_affinity 	= xilinx_msi_set_affinity,
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= xilinx_compose_msi_msg,
+};
 
-/**
- * xilinx_pcie_msi_setup_irq - Setup MSI request
- * @chip: MSI chip pointer
- * @pdev: PCIe device pointer
- * @desc: MSI descriptor pointer
- *
- * Return: '0' on success and error value on failure
- */
-static int xilinx_pcie_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
-				     struct pci_dev *pdev,
-				     struct msi_desc *desc)
+static int xilinx_msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				  unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
 {
-	struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = pdev->bus->sysdata;
-	unsigned int irq;
-	int hwirq;
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-	phys_addr_t msg_addr;
+	struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = domain->host_data;
+	int hwirq, i;
+
+	mutex_lock(&port->map_lock);
+
+	hwirq = bitmap_find_free_region(port->msi_map, XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS, order_base_2(nr_irqs));
+
+	mutex_unlock(&port->map_lock);
 
-	hwirq = xilinx_pcie_assign_msi();
 	if (hwirq < 0)
-		return hwirq;
+		return -ENOSPC;
 
-	irq = irq_create_mapping(port->msi_domain, hwirq);
-	if (!irq)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
+		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
+				    &xilinx_msi_bottom_chip, domain->host_data,
+				    handle_edge_irq, NULL, NULL);
 
-	irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
+	return 0;
+}
 
-	msg_addr = virt_to_phys(port);
+static void xilinx_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				  unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+	struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+	struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = domain->host_data;
 
-	msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msg_addr);
-	msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msg_addr);
-	msg.data = irq;
+	mutex_lock(&port->map_lock);
 
-	pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
+	bitmap_release_region(port->msi_map, d->hwirq, order_base_2(nr_irqs));
 
-	return 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&port->map_lock);
 }
 
-/* MSI Chip Descriptor */
-static struct msi_controller xilinx_pcie_msi_chip = {
-	.setup_irq = xilinx_pcie_msi_setup_irq,
-	.teardown_irq = xilinx_msi_teardown_irq,
+static const struct irq_domain_ops xilinx_msi_domain_ops = {
+	.alloc	= xilinx_msi_domain_alloc,
+	.free	= xilinx_msi_domain_free,
 };
 
-/* HW Interrupt Chip Descriptor */
-static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_irq_chip = {
-	.name = "Xilinx PCIe MSI",
-	.irq_enable = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
-	.irq_disable = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
+static struct msi_domain_info xilinx_msi_info = {
+	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS),
+	.chip	= &xilinx_msi_top_chip,
 };
 
-/**
- * xilinx_pcie_msi_map - Set the handler for the MSI and mark IRQ as valid
- * @domain: IRQ domain
- * @irq: Virtual IRQ number
- * @hwirq: HW interrupt number
- *
- * Return: Always returns 0.
- */
-static int xilinx_pcie_msi_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
-			       irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+static int xilinx_allocate_msi_domains(struct xilinx_pcie_port *pcie)
 {
-	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &xilinx_msi_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(pcie->dev);
+	struct irq_domain *parent;
+
+	parent = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS,
+					  &xilinx_msi_domain_ops, pcie);
+	if (!parent) {
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	irq_domain_update_bus_token(parent, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
+
+	pcie->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, &xilinx_msi_info, parent);
+	if (!pcie->msi_domain) {
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
+		irq_domain_remove(parent);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/* IRQ Domain operations */
-static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
-	.map = xilinx_pcie_msi_map,
-};
-
-/**
- * xilinx_pcie_enable_msi - Enable MSI support
- * @port: PCIe port information
- */
-static int xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
+static void xilinx_free_msi_domains(struct xilinx_pcie_port *pcie)
 {
-	phys_addr_t msg_addr;
-
-	msg_addr = virt_to_phys(port);
-	pcie_write(port, upper_32_bit(msg_addr), XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1);
-	pcie_write(port, lower_32_bits(msg_addr), XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2);
+	struct irq_domain *parent = pcie->msi_domain->parent;
 
-	return 0;
+	irq_domain_remove(pcie->msi_domain);
+	irq_domain_remove(parent);
 }
 
 /* INTx Functions */
@@ -414,6 +375,8 @@ static irqreturn_t xilinx_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
 	}
 
 	if (status & (XILINX_PCIE_INTR_INTX | XILINX_PCIE_INTR_MSI)) {
+		unsigned int irq;
+
 		val = pcie_read(port, XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPIFR1);
 
 		/* Check whether interrupt valid */
@@ -426,20 +389,19 @@ static irqreturn_t xilinx_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
 		if (val & XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_MSI_INTR) {
 			val = pcie_read(port, XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPIFR2) &
 				XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR2_MSG_DATA;
+			irq = irq_find_mapping(port->msi_domain->parent, val);
 		} else {
 			val = (val & XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_MASK) >>
 				XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_SHIFT;
-			val = irq_find_mapping(port->leg_domain, val);
+			irq = irq_find_mapping(port->leg_domain, val);
 		}
 
 		/* Clear interrupt FIFO register 1 */
 		pcie_write(port, XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_ALL_MASK,
 			   XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPIFR1);
 
-		/* Handle the interrupt */
-		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) ||
-		    !(val & XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_MSI_INTR))
-			generic_handle_irq(val);
+		if (irq)
+			generic_handle_irq(irq);
 	}
 
 	if (status & XILINX_PCIE_INTR_SLV_UNSUPP)
@@ -485,12 +447,11 @@ static irqreturn_t xilinx_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
 static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
 {
 	struct device *dev = port->dev;
-	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
 	struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* Setup INTx */
-	pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(node, NULL);
+	pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(dev->of_node, NULL);
 	if (!pcie_intc_node) {
 		dev_err(dev, "No PCIe Intc node found\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -507,18 +468,14 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
 
 	/* Setup MSI */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
-		port->msi_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node,
-							 XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS,
-							 &msi_domain_ops,
-							 &xilinx_pcie_msi_chip);
-		if (!port->msi_domain) {
-			dev_err(dev, "Failed to get a MSI IRQ domain\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
+		phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(port);
 
-		ret = xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(port);
+		ret = xilinx_allocate_msi_domains(port);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
+
+		pcie_write(port, upper_32_bits(pa), XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1);
+		pcie_write(port, lower_32_bits(pa), XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -566,6 +523,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_parse_dt(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
 	struct device *dev = port->dev;
 	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
 	struct resource regs;
+	unsigned int irq;
 	int err;
 
 	err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &regs);
@@ -578,12 +536,12 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_parse_dt(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
 	if (IS_ERR(port->reg_base))
 		return PTR_ERR(port->reg_base);
 
-	port->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
-	err = devm_request_irq(dev, port->irq, xilinx_pcie_intr_handler,
+	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
+	err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, xilinx_pcie_intr_handler,
 			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
 			       "xilinx-pcie", port);
 	if (err) {
-		dev_err(dev, "unable to request irq %d\n", port->irq);
+		dev_err(dev, "unable to request irq %d\n", irq);
 		return err;
 	}
 
@@ -611,7 +569,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	port = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
-
+	mutex_init(&port->map_lock);
 	port->dev = dev;
 
 	err = xilinx_pcie_parse_dt(port);
@@ -631,11 +589,11 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	bridge->sysdata = port;
 	bridge->ops = &xilinx_pcie_ops;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
-	xilinx_pcie_msi_chip.dev = dev;
-	bridge->msi = &xilinx_pcie_msi_chip;
-#endif
-	return pci_host_probe(bridge);
+	err = pci_host_probe(bridge);
+	if (err)
+		xilinx_free_msi_domains(port);
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id xilinx_pcie_of_match[] = {
-- 
2.29.2

RE: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains

[Bharat Kumar Gogada]

Hi Marc,

Thanks for the patch. 

> Subject: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains
> 
> In anticipation of the removal of the msi_controller structure, convert the
> ancient xilinx host controller driver to MSI domains.
> 
> We end-up with the usual two domain structure, the top one being a generic
> PCI/MSI domain, the bottom one being xilinx-specific and handling the
> actual HW interrupt allocation.
> 
> This allows us to fix some of the most appalling MSI programming, where the
> message programmed in the device is the virtual IRQ number instead of the
> allocated vector number. The allocator is also made safe with a mutex. This
> should allow support for MultiMSI, but I decided not to even try, since I
> cannot test it.
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig       |   2 +-
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 234 +++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
> index 5cc07d28a3a0..60045f7aafc5 100644
...


> +static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_bottom_chip = {
> +	.name			= "Xilinx MSI",
> +	.irq_set_affinity 	= xilinx_msi_set_affinity,
> +	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= xilinx_compose_msi_msg,
> +};
> 
I see a crash while testing MSI in handle_edge_irq
[<c015bdd4>] (handle_edge_irq) from [<c0157164>] (generic_handle_irq+0x28/0x38)
[<c0157164>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c03a9714>] (xilinx_pcie_intr_handler+0x17c/0x2b0)
[<c03a9714>] (xilinx_pcie_intr_handler) from [<c0157d94>] (__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x3c/0xc0)
[<c0157d94>] (__handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c0157e44>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2c/0x7c)
[<c0157e44>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c0157ecc>] (handle_irq_event+0x38/0x5c)
[<c0157ecc>] (handle_irq_event) from [<c015bc8c>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9c/0x114)

void handle_edge_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) {
...
        kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);

        /* Start handling the irq */
        desc->irq_data.chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);	//There is no check here for ack function is registered for chip
..
}

> -/**
> - * xilinx_pcie_msi_setup_irq - Setup MSI request
> - * @chip: MSI chip pointer
> - * @pdev: PCIe device pointer
> - * @desc: MSI descriptor pointer
> - *
> - * Return: '0' on success and error value on failure
> - */
> -static int xilinx_pcie_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
> -				     struct pci_dev *pdev,
> -				     struct msi_desc *desc)
> +static int xilinx_msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int
> virq,
> +				  unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
>  {
> -	struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = pdev->bus->sysdata;
> -	unsigned int irq;
> -	int hwirq;
> -	struct msi_msg msg;
> -	phys_addr_t msg_addr;
> +	struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = domain->host_data;
> +	int hwirq, i;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&port->map_lock);
> +
> +	hwirq = bitmap_find_free_region(port->msi_map,
> XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS,
> +order_base_2(nr_irqs));
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&port->map_lock);
> 
> -	hwirq = xilinx_pcie_assign_msi();
>  	if (hwirq < 0)
> -		return hwirq;
> +		return -ENOSPC;
> 
> -	irq = irq_create_mapping(port->msi_domain, hwirq);
> -	if (!irq)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
> +		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
> +				    &xilinx_msi_bottom_chip, domain-
> >host_data,
> +				    handle_edge_irq, NULL, NULL);
> 
> -	irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
> +	return 0;
> +}
>

Regards,
Bharat 

Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:42:24 +0000,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> Thanks for the patch. 
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains
> > 
> > In anticipation of the removal of the msi_controller structure, convert the
> > ancient xilinx host controller driver to MSI domains.
> > 
> > We end-up with the usual two domain structure, the top one being a generic
> > PCI/MSI domain, the bottom one being xilinx-specific and handling the
> > actual HW interrupt allocation.
> > 
> > This allows us to fix some of the most appalling MSI programming, where the
> > message programmed in the device is the virtual IRQ number instead of the
> > allocated vector number. The allocator is also made safe with a mutex. This
> > should allow support for MultiMSI, but I decided not to even try, since I
> > cannot test it.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig       |   2 +-
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 234 +++++++++++----------------
> >  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
> > index 5cc07d28a3a0..60045f7aafc5 100644
> ...
> 
> 
> > +static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_bottom_chip = {
> > +	.name			= "Xilinx MSI",
> > +	.irq_set_affinity 	= xilinx_msi_set_affinity,
> > +	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= xilinx_compose_msi_msg,
> > +};
> > 
> I see a crash while testing MSI in handle_edge_irq
> [<c015bdd4>] (handle_edge_irq) from [<c0157164>] (generic_handle_irq+0x28/0x38)
> [<c0157164>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c03a9714>] (xilinx_pcie_intr_handler+0x17c/0x2b0)
> [<c03a9714>] (xilinx_pcie_intr_handler) from [<c0157d94>] (__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x3c/0xc0)
> [<c0157d94>] (__handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c0157e44>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2c/0x7c)
> [<c0157e44>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c0157ecc>] (handle_irq_event+0x38/0x5c)
> [<c0157ecc>] (handle_irq_event) from [<c015bc8c>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9c/0x114)

Thanks for that. Can you please try the following patch and let me
know if it helps?

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
index ad9abf405167..14001febf59a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
@@ -194,8 +194,18 @@ static struct pci_ops xilinx_pcie_ops = {
 
 /* MSI functions */
 
+static void xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	/*
+	 * xilinx_pcie_intr_handler() will have performed the Ack.
+	 * Eventually, this should be fixed and the Ack be moved in
+	 * the respective callbacks for INTx and MSI.
+	 */
+}
+
 static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_top_chip = {
 	.name		= "PCIe MSI",
+	.irq_ack	= xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack,
 };
 
 static int xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
@@ -206,7 +216,7 @@ static int xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mas
 static void xilinx_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
 	struct xilinx_pcie_port *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
-	phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(pcie);
+	phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(pcie), SZ_4K);
 
 	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
 	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa);
@@ -468,7 +478,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
 
 	/* Setup MSI */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
-		phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(port);
+		phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(port), SZ_4K);
 
 		ret = xilinx_allocate_msi_domains(port);
 		if (ret)

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

RE: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains

[Bharat Kumar Gogada]

> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains
> > >
> > > In anticipation of the removal of the msi_controller structure,
> > > convert the ancient xilinx host controller driver to MSI domains.
> > >
> > > We end-up with the usual two domain structure, the top one being a
> > > generic PCI/MSI domain, the bottom one being xilinx-specific and
> > > handling the actual HW interrupt allocation.
> > >
> > > This allows us to fix some of the most appalling MSI programming,
> > > where the message programmed in the device is the virtual IRQ number
> > > instead of the allocated vector number. The allocator is also made
> > > safe with a mutex. This should allow support for MultiMSI, but I
> > > decided not to even try, since I cannot test it.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig       |   2 +-
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 234
> > > +++++++++++----------------
> > >  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig index 5cc07d28a3a0..60045f7aafc5
> > > 100644
> > ...
> >
> >
> > > +static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_bottom_chip = {
> > > +	.name			= "Xilinx MSI",
> > > +	.irq_set_affinity 	= xilinx_msi_set_affinity,
> > > +	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= xilinx_compose_msi_msg,
> > > +};
> > >
> > I see a crash while testing MSI in handle_edge_irq [<c015bdd4>]
> > (handle_edge_irq) from [<c0157164>] (generic_handle_irq+0x28/0x38)
> > [<c0157164>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c03a9714>]
> > (xilinx_pcie_intr_handler+0x17c/0x2b0)
> > [<c03a9714>] (xilinx_pcie_intr_handler) from [<c0157d94>]
> > (__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x3c/0xc0)
> > [<c0157d94>] (__handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c0157e44>]
> > (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2c/0x7c)
> > [<c0157e44>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c0157ecc>]
> > (handle_irq_event+0x38/0x5c) [<c0157ecc>] (handle_irq_event) from
> > [<c015bc8c>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9c/0x114)
> 
> Thanks for that. Can you please try the following patch and let me know if it
> helps?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-
> xilinx.c
> index ad9abf405167..14001febf59a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> @@ -194,8 +194,18 @@ static struct pci_ops xilinx_pcie_ops = {
> 
>  /* MSI functions */
> 
> +static void xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d) {
> +	/*
> +	 * xilinx_pcie_intr_handler() will have performed the Ack.
> +	 * Eventually, this should be fixed and the Ack be moved in
> +	 * the respective callbacks for INTx and MSI.
> +	 */
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_top_chip = {
>  	.name		= "PCIe MSI",
> +	.irq_ack	= xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack,
>  };
> 
>  static int xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask
> *mask, bool force) @@ -206,7 +216,7 @@ static int
> xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mas  static
> void xilinx_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)  {
>  	struct xilinx_pcie_port *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> -	phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(pcie);
> +	phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(pcie), SZ_4K);
> 
>  	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
>  	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa);
> @@ -468,7 +478,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct
> xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> 
>  	/* Setup MSI */
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> -		phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(port);
> +		phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(port), SZ_4K);
> 
>  		ret = xilinx_allocate_msi_domains(port);
>  		if (ret)
> 
Thanks Marc.
With above patch now everything works fine, tested a Samsung NVMe SSD. 
tst~# lspci
00:00.0 PCI bridge: Xilinx Corporation Device 0706
01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller 172Xa/172Xb (rev 01)

Regards,
Bharat

Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:56:16 +0000,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> wrote:

> > Thanks for that. Can you please try the following patch and let me know if it
> > helps?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	M.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-
> > xilinx.c
> > index ad9abf405167..14001febf59a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> > @@ -194,8 +194,18 @@ static struct pci_ops xilinx_pcie_ops = {
> > 
> >  /* MSI functions */
> > 
> > +static void xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d) {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * xilinx_pcie_intr_handler() will have performed the Ack.
> > +	 * Eventually, this should be fixed and the Ack be moved in
> > +	 * the respective callbacks for INTx and MSI.
> > +	 */
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_top_chip = {
> >  	.name		= "PCIe MSI",
> > +	.irq_ack	= xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack,
> >  };
> > 
> >  static int xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask
> > *mask, bool force) @@ -206,7 +216,7 @@ static int
> > xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mas  static
> > void xilinx_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)  {
> >  	struct xilinx_pcie_port *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > -	phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(pcie);
> > +	phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(pcie), SZ_4K);
> > 
> >  	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
> >  	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa);
> > @@ -468,7 +478,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct
> > xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> > 
> >  	/* Setup MSI */
> >  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> > -		phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(port);
> > +		phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(port), SZ_4K);
> > 
> >  		ret = xilinx_allocate_msi_domains(port);
> >  		if (ret)
> > 
> Thanks Marc.
> With above patch now everything works fine, tested a Samsung NVMe SSD. 
> tst~# lspci
> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Xilinx Corporation Device 0706
> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller 172Xa/172Xb (rev 01)

Great, thanks for giving it a shot. Can I take this as a Tested-by:
tag?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

RE: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains

[Bharat Kumar Gogada]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] PCI: xilinx: Convert to MSI domains
> 
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:56:16 +0000,
> Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Thanks for that. Can you please try the following patch and let me
> > > know if it helps?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > 	M.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie- xilinx.c index
> > > ad9abf405167..14001febf59a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> > > @@ -194,8 +194,18 @@ static struct pci_ops xilinx_pcie_ops = {
> > >
> > >  /* MSI functions */
> > >
> > > +static void xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d) {
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * xilinx_pcie_intr_handler() will have performed the Ack.
> > > +	 * Eventually, this should be fixed and the Ack be moved in
> > > +	 * the respective callbacks for INTx and MSI.
> > > +	 */
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static struct irq_chip xilinx_msi_top_chip = {
> > >  	.name		= "PCIe MSI",
> > > +	.irq_ack	= xilinx_msi_top_irq_ack,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct
> > > cpumask *mask, bool force) @@ -206,7 +216,7 @@ static int
> > > xilinx_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask
> > > *mas  static void xilinx_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct
> msi_msg *msg)  {
> > >  	struct xilinx_pcie_port *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > -	phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(pcie);
> > > +	phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(pcie), SZ_4K);
> > >
> > >  	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(pa);
> > >  	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(pa); @@ -468,7 +478,7 @@ static
> > > int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct
> > > xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> > >
> > >  	/* Setup MSI */
> > >  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> > > -		phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(port);
> > > +		phys_addr_t pa = ALIGN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(port), SZ_4K);
> > >
> > >  		ret = xilinx_allocate_msi_domains(port);
> > >  		if (ret)
> > >
> > Thanks Marc.
> > With above patch now everything works fine, tested a Samsung NVMe SSD.
> > tst~# lspci
> > 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Xilinx Corporation Device 0706
> > 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
> > NVMe SSD Controller 172Xa/172Xb (rev 01)
> 
> Great, thanks for giving it a shot. Can I take this as a Tested-by:
> tag?
> 
Yes. 

Regards,
Bharat

[PATCH v2 06/15] PCI: hv: Drop msi_controller structure

[Marc Zyngier]

The Hyper-V PCI driver still makes use of a msi_controller structure,
but it looks more like a distant leftover than anything actually
useful, since it is initialised to 0 and never used for anything.

Just remove it.

Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index 27a17a1e4a7c..2c014ba7ed4b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -473,7 +473,6 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device {
 	struct list_head dr_list;
 
 	struct msi_domain_info msi_info;
-	struct msi_controller msi_chip;
 	struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
 
 	spinlock_t retarget_msi_interrupt_lock;
@@ -1866,9 +1865,6 @@ static int create_root_hv_pci_bus(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus)
 	if (!hbus->pci_bus)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	hbus->pci_bus->msi = &hbus->msi_chip;
-	hbus->pci_bus->msi->dev = &hbus->hdev->device;
-
 	pci_lock_rescan_remove();
 	pci_scan_child_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
 	hv_pci_assign_numa_node(hbus);
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 07/15] PCI/MSI: Drop use of msi_controller from core code

[Marc Zyngier]

As there is no driver using msi_controller, we can now safely
remove its use from the PCI probe code.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c   | 23 +----------------------
 drivers/pci/probe.c |  2 --
 include/linux/pci.h |  2 --
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 3162f88fe940..79b5a995bd02 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -64,39 +64,18 @@ static void pci_msi_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 /* Arch hooks */
 int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc)
 {
-	struct msi_controller *chip = dev->bus->msi;
-	int err;
-
-	if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	err = chip->setup_irq(chip, dev, desc);
-	if (err < 0)
-		return err;
-
-	irq_set_chip_data(desc->irq, chip);
-
-	return 0;
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
-	struct msi_controller *chip = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
-
-	if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq)
-		return;
-
-	chip->teardown_irq(chip, irq);
 }
 
 int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 {
-	struct msi_controller *chip = dev->bus->msi;
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (chip && chip->setup_irqs)
-		return chip->setup_irqs(chip, dev, nvec, type);
 	/*
 	 * If an architecture wants to support multiple MSI, it needs to
 	 * override arch_setup_msi_irqs()
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 953f15abc850..fb04fc81a8bd 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -895,7 +895,6 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 	/* Temporarily move resources off the list */
 	list_splice_init(&bridge->windows, &resources);
 	bus->sysdata = bridge->sysdata;
-	bus->msi = bridge->msi;
 	bus->ops = bridge->ops;
 	bus->number = bus->busn_res.start = bridge->busnr;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
@@ -1053,7 +1052,6 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
 		return NULL;
 
 	child->parent = parent;
-	child->msi = parent->msi;
 	child->sysdata = parent->sysdata;
 	child->bus_flags = parent->bus_flags;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 86c799c97b77..ebf557e59d87 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -540,7 +540,6 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
 	int (*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8);
 	void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *);
 	void		*release_data;
-	struct msi_controller *msi;
 	unsigned int	ignore_reset_delay:1;	/* For entire hierarchy */
 	unsigned int	no_ext_tags:1;		/* No Extended Tags */
 	unsigned int	native_aer:1;		/* OS may use PCIe AER */
@@ -621,7 +620,6 @@ struct pci_bus {
 	struct resource busn_res;	/* Bus numbers routed to this bus */
 
 	struct pci_ops	*ops;		/* Configuration access functions */
-	struct msi_controller *msi;	/* MSI controller */
 	void		*sysdata;	/* Hook for sys-specific extension */
 	struct proc_dir_entry *procdir;	/* Directory entry in /proc/bus/pci */
 
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 08/15] PCI/MSI: Kill msi_controller structure

[Marc Zyngier]

msi_controller had a good, long life as the abstraction for
a driver providing MSIs to PCI devices. But it has been replaced
in all drivers by the more expressive generic MSI framework.

Farewell, struct msi_controller.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/msi.h | 16 +---------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index aef35fd1cf11..3f21e77b57b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -240,8 +240,7 @@ void pci_msi_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data);
 /*
  * The arch hooks to setup up msi irqs. Default functions are implemented
  * as weak symbols so that they /can/ be overriden by architecture specific
- * code if needed. These hooks must be enabled by the architecture or by
- * drivers which depend on them via msi_controller based MSI handling.
+ * code if needed. These hooks can only be enabled by the architecture.
  *
  * If CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS is not selected they are replaced by
  * stubs with warnings.
@@ -272,19 +271,6 @@ static inline void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
 void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
 
-struct msi_controller {
-	struct module *owner;
-	struct device *dev;
-	struct device_node *of_node;
-	struct list_head list;
-
-	int (*setup_irq)(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *dev,
-			 struct msi_desc *desc);
-	int (*setup_irqs)(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *dev,
-			  int nvec, int type);
-	void (*teardown_irq)(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq);
-};
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
 
 #include <linux/irqhandler.h>
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 09/15] PCI/MSI: Kill default_teardown_msi_irqs()

[Marc Zyngier]

It doesn't have any caller left.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c   | 11 +----------
 include/linux/msi.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 79b5a995bd02..d9c73c173c14 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -94,11 +94,7 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * We have a default implementation available as a separate non-weak
- * function, as it is used by the Xen x86 PCI code
- */
-void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct msi_desc *entry;
@@ -108,11 +104,6 @@ void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
 			for (i = 0; i < entry->nvec_used; i++)
 				arch_teardown_msi_irq(entry->irq + i);
 }
-
-void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
-	return default_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
-}
 #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS */
 
 static void default_restore_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int irq)
diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 3f21e77b57b7..6aff469e511d 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc);
 void arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
 int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type);
 void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
-void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
 #else
 static inline int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
 {
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 10/15] PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their lack of MSI handling

[Marc Zyngier]

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Some PCI host bridges cannot deal with MSIs at all. This has
the unfortunate effect of triggering ugly warnings when an end-point
driver requests MSIs.

Instead, let the bridge advertise such lack of MSIs, so that it
can be flagged correctly by the core code.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[maz: commit message]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 ++
 include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index fb04fc81a8bd..146bd85c037e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -925,6 +925,8 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 	device_enable_async_suspend(bus->bridge);
 	pci_set_bus_of_node(bus);
 	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(bus);
+	if (bridge->no_msi)
+		bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
 
 	if (!parent)
 		set_dev_node(bus->bridge, pcibus_to_node(bus));
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index ebf557e59d87..48605cca82ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
 	unsigned int	native_dpc:1;		/* OS may use PCIe DPC */
 	unsigned int	preserve_config:1;	/* Preserve FW resource setup */
 	unsigned int	size_windows:1;		/* Enable root bus sizing */
+	unsigned int	no_msi:1;		/* Bridge has no MSI support */
 
 	/* Resource alignment requirements */
 	resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 11/15] PCI: mediatek: Advertise lack of MSI handling

[Marc Zyngier]

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Some Mediatek host bridges cannot handle MSIs, which is sad.
This also results in an ugly warning at device probe time,
as the core PCI code wasn't told that MSIs were not available.

Advertise this fact to the rest of the core PCI code by
using the 'no_msi' attribute.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reported-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[maz: commit message]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
index 23548b517e4b..ba28abdd1362 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port;
  * struct mtk_pcie_soc - differentiate between host generations
  * @need_fix_class_id: whether this host's class ID needed to be fixed or not
  * @need_fix_device_id: whether this host's device ID needed to be fixed or not
+ * @no_msi: Bridge has no MSI support
  * @device_id: device ID which this host need to be fixed
  * @ops: pointer to configuration access functions
  * @startup: pointer to controller setting functions
@@ -151,6 +152,7 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port;
 struct mtk_pcie_soc {
 	bool need_fix_class_id;
 	bool need_fix_device_id;
+	bool no_msi;
 	unsigned int device_id;
 	struct pci_ops *ops;
 	int (*startup)(struct mtk_pcie_port *port);
@@ -1087,6 +1089,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	host->ops = pcie->soc->ops;
 	host->sysdata = pcie;
+	host->no_msi = pcie->soc->no_msi;
 
 	err = pci_host_probe(host);
 	if (err)
@@ -1176,6 +1179,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops mtk_pcie_pm_ops = {
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_v1 = {
+	.no_msi = true,
 	.ops = &mtk_pcie_ops,
 	.startup = mtk_pcie_startup_port,
 };
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 12/15] PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their reliance on MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

The new 'no_msi' attribute solves the problem of advertising the lack
of MSI capability for host bridges that know for sure that there will
be no MSI for their end-points.

However, there is a whole class of host bridges that cannot know
whether MSIs will be provided or not, as they rely on other blocks
to provide the MSI functionnality, using MSI domains.  This is
the case for example on systems that use the ARM GIC architecture.

Introduce a new attribute ('msi_domain') indicating that implicit
dependency, and use this property to set the NO_MSI flag when
no MSI domain is found at probe time.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
 include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 146bd85c037e..bac9f69a06a8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 	device_enable_async_suspend(bus->bridge);
 	pci_set_bus_of_node(bus);
 	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(bus);
-	if (bridge->no_msi)
+	if (bridge->no_msi || (bridge->msi_domain && !bus->dev.msi_domain))
 		bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
 
 	if (!parent)
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 48605cca82ae..d322d00db432 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
 	unsigned int	preserve_config:1;	/* Preserve FW resource setup */
 	unsigned int	size_windows:1;		/* Enable root bus sizing */
 	unsigned int	no_msi:1;		/* Bridge has no MSI support */
+	unsigned int	msi_domain:1;		/* Bridge wants MSI domain */
 
 	/* Resource alignment requirements */
 	resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their reliance on MSI domains

[Robin Murphy]

On 2021-03-22 18:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The new 'no_msi' attribute solves the problem of advertising the lack
> of MSI capability for host bridges that know for sure that there will
> be no MSI for their end-points.
> 
> However, there is a whole class of host bridges that cannot know
> whether MSIs will be provided or not, as they rely on other blocks
> to provide the MSI functionnality, using MSI domains.  This is
> the case for example on systems that use the ARM GIC architecture.
> 
> Introduce a new attribute ('msi_domain') indicating that implicit
> dependency, and use this property to set the NO_MSI flag when
> no MSI domain is found at probe time.
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
>   include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 146bd85c037e..bac9f69a06a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>   	device_enable_async_suspend(bus->bridge);
>   	pci_set_bus_of_node(bus);
>   	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(bus);
> -	if (bridge->no_msi)
> +	if (bridge->no_msi || (bridge->msi_domain && !bus->dev.msi_domain))
>   		bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
>   
>   	if (!parent)
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 48605cca82ae..d322d00db432 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
>   	unsigned int	preserve_config:1;	/* Preserve FW resource setup */
>   	unsigned int	size_windows:1;		/* Enable root bus sizing */
>   	unsigned int	no_msi:1;		/* Bridge has no MSI support */
> +	unsigned int	msi_domain:1;		/* Bridge wants MSI domain */

Aren't these really the same thing? Either way we're saying the bridge 
itself doesn't handle MSIs, it's just in one case we're effectively 
encoding a platform-specific assumption that an external domain won't be 
provided. I can't help wondering whether that distinction is really 
necessary...

Robin.

>   
>   	/* Resource alignment requirements */
>   	resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their reliance on MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

Hi Robin,

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:45:02 +0000,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2021-03-22 18:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The new 'no_msi' attribute solves the problem of advertising the lack
> > of MSI capability for host bridges that know for sure that there will
> > be no MSI for their end-points.
> > 
> > However, there is a whole class of host bridges that cannot know
> > whether MSIs will be provided or not, as they rely on other blocks
> > to provide the MSI functionnality, using MSI domains.  This is
> > the case for example on systems that use the ARM GIC architecture.
> > 
> > Introduce a new attribute ('msi_domain') indicating that implicit
> > dependency, and use this property to set the NO_MSI flag when
> > no MSI domain is found at probe time.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
> >   include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> >   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index 146bd85c037e..bac9f69a06a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> >   	device_enable_async_suspend(bus->bridge);
> >   	pci_set_bus_of_node(bus);
> >   	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(bus);
> > -	if (bridge->no_msi)
> > +	if (bridge->no_msi || (bridge->msi_domain && !bus->dev.msi_domain))
> >   		bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
> >     	if (!parent)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index 48605cca82ae..d322d00db432 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
> >   	unsigned int	preserve_config:1;	/* Preserve FW resource setup */
> >   	unsigned int	size_windows:1;		/* Enable root bus sizing */
> >   	unsigned int	no_msi:1;		/* Bridge has no MSI support */
> > +	unsigned int	msi_domain:1;		/* Bridge wants MSI domain */
> 
> Aren't these really the same thing? Either way we're saying the bridge
> itself doesn't handle MSIs, it's just in one case we're effectively
> encoding a platform-specific assumption that an external domain won't
> be provided. I can't help wondering whether that distinction is really
> necessary...

There is a subtle difference: no_msi indicates that there is no way
*any* MSI can be dealt with whatsoever (maybe because the RC doesn't
forward the corresponding TLPs?). msi_domain says "no MSI unless...".

We could implement the former with the latter, but I have the feeling
that's not totally bullet proof. Happy to revisit this if you think it
really matters.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their reliance on MSI domains

[Robin Murphy]

On 2021-03-23 18:09, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Robin,
> 
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:45:02 +0000,
> Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-03-22 18:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> The new 'no_msi' attribute solves the problem of advertising the lack
>>> of MSI capability for host bridges that know for sure that there will
>>> be no MSI for their end-points.
>>>
>>> However, there is a whole class of host bridges that cannot know
>>> whether MSIs will be provided or not, as they rely on other blocks
>>> to provide the MSI functionnality, using MSI domains.  This is
>>> the case for example on systems that use the ARM GIC architecture.
>>>
>>> Introduce a new attribute ('msi_domain') indicating that implicit
>>> dependency, and use this property to set the NO_MSI flag when
>>> no MSI domain is found at probe time.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
>>>    include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
>>>    2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> index 146bd85c037e..bac9f69a06a8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>>>    	device_enable_async_suspend(bus->bridge);
>>>    	pci_set_bus_of_node(bus);
>>>    	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(bus);
>>> -	if (bridge->no_msi)
>>> +	if (bridge->no_msi || (bridge->msi_domain && !bus->dev.msi_domain))
>>>    		bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
>>>      	if (!parent)
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>>> index 48605cca82ae..d322d00db432 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>>> @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
>>>    	unsigned int	preserve_config:1;	/* Preserve FW resource setup */
>>>    	unsigned int	size_windows:1;		/* Enable root bus sizing */
>>>    	unsigned int	no_msi:1;		/* Bridge has no MSI support */
>>> +	unsigned int	msi_domain:1;		/* Bridge wants MSI domain */
>>
>> Aren't these really the same thing? Either way we're saying the bridge
>> itself doesn't handle MSIs, it's just in one case we're effectively
>> encoding a platform-specific assumption that an external domain won't
>> be provided. I can't help wondering whether that distinction is really
>> necessary...
> 
> There is a subtle difference: no_msi indicates that there is no way
> *any* MSI can be dealt with whatsoever (maybe because the RC doesn't
> forward the corresponding TLPs?). msi_domain says "no MSI unless...".

PCI says that MSIs are simply memory writes at the transaction level, so 
AFAIK unless the host bridge can't support DMA at all, it shouldn't be 
in a position to make any assumptions about what transactions mean what.

I suppose there could in theory be an issue in the other direction, 
where config space somehow didn't allow access to the MSI capability in 
the first place, but then we'd presumably just never detect any device 
as being MSI-capable in the first place, and it wouldn't matter either way.

> We could implement the former with the latter, but I have the feeling
> that's not totally bullet proof. Happy to revisit this if you think it
> really matters.

I would expect it to be a fairly safe assumption that a host bridge 
which "doesn't support MSIs" wouldn't have an msi-parent set, but I 
don't have a strong opinion either way - I just figured we could 
probably save a little bit of complexity here.

Cheers,
Robin.

Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their reliance on MSI domains

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 06:09:36PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Robin,
> 
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:45:02 +0000,
> Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 2021-03-22 18:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > The new 'no_msi' attribute solves the problem of advertising the lack
> > > of MSI capability for host bridges that know for sure that there will
> > > be no MSI for their end-points.
> > > 
> > > However, there is a whole class of host bridges that cannot know
> > > whether MSIs will be provided or not, as they rely on other blocks
> > > to provide the MSI functionnality, using MSI domains.  This is
> > > the case for example on systems that use the ARM GIC architecture.
> > > 
> > > Introduce a new attribute ('msi_domain') indicating that implicit
> > > dependency, and use this property to set the NO_MSI flag when
> > > no MSI domain is found at probe time.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
> > >   include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> > >   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > index 146bd85c037e..bac9f69a06a8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> > >   	device_enable_async_suspend(bus->bridge);
> > >   	pci_set_bus_of_node(bus);
> > >   	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(bus);
> > > -	if (bridge->no_msi)
> > > +	if (bridge->no_msi || (bridge->msi_domain && !bus->dev.msi_domain))
> > >   		bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
> > >     	if (!parent)
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > > index 48605cca82ae..d322d00db432 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > > @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
> > >   	unsigned int	preserve_config:1;	/* Preserve FW resource setup */
> > >   	unsigned int	size_windows:1;		/* Enable root bus sizing */
> > >   	unsigned int	no_msi:1;		/* Bridge has no MSI support */
> > > +	unsigned int	msi_domain:1;		/* Bridge wants MSI domain */
> > 
> > Aren't these really the same thing? Either way we're saying the bridge
> > itself doesn't handle MSIs, it's just in one case we're effectively
> > encoding a platform-specific assumption that an external domain won't
> > be provided. I can't help wondering whether that distinction is really
> > necessary...
> 
> There is a subtle difference: no_msi indicates that there is no way
> *any* MSI can be dealt with whatsoever (maybe because the RC doesn't
> forward the corresponding TLPs?). msi_domain says "no MSI unless...".
> 
> We could implement the former with the latter, but I have the feeling
> that's not totally bullet proof. Happy to revisit this if you think it
> really matters.

IIUC msi_domain == 1 means: this host bridge needs an msi_domain to enable
MSIs, which in turn means that there are bridges that do _not_ require
an msi_domain to enable MSIs. I don't know how other arches handle the 
msi_domain pointer but I am asking whether making:

if (bridge->no_msi || !bus->dev.msi_domain))
	bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;

is a possibility (removing the need for the msi_domain flag).

At least this looks more like an arch property than a host bridge
specific property (eg patch [13] pci_host_common_probe() may be used on
arches other than ARM where it is not necessary true that it requires an
msi_domain to enable MSIs).

I agree that's complicated to untangle - just asking if there is way
to simplify it.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- 
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] PCI/MSI: Let PCI host bridges declare their reliance on MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:19:38 +0000,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 06:09:36PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Hi Robin,
> > 
> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:45:02 +0000,
> > Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 2021-03-22 18:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > The new 'no_msi' attribute solves the problem of advertising the lack
> > > > of MSI capability for host bridges that know for sure that there will
> > > > be no MSI for their end-points.
> > > > 
> > > > However, there is a whole class of host bridges that cannot know
> > > > whether MSIs will be provided or not, as they rely on other blocks
> > > > to provide the MSI functionnality, using MSI domains.  This is
> > > > the case for example on systems that use the ARM GIC architecture.
> > > > 
> > > > Introduce a new attribute ('msi_domain') indicating that implicit
> > > > dependency, and use this property to set the NO_MSI flag when
> > > > no MSI domain is found at probe time.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >   drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
> > > >   include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> > > >   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > index 146bd85c037e..bac9f69a06a8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> > > >   	device_enable_async_suspend(bus->bridge);
> > > >   	pci_set_bus_of_node(bus);
> > > >   	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(bus);
> > > > -	if (bridge->no_msi)
> > > > +	if (bridge->no_msi || (bridge->msi_domain && !bus->dev.msi_domain))
> > > >   		bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
> > > >     	if (!parent)
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > > > index 48605cca82ae..d322d00db432 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > > > @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
> > > >   	unsigned int	preserve_config:1;	/* Preserve FW resource setup */
> > > >   	unsigned int	size_windows:1;		/* Enable root bus sizing */
> > > >   	unsigned int	no_msi:1;		/* Bridge has no MSI support */
> > > > +	unsigned int	msi_domain:1;		/* Bridge wants MSI domain */
> > > 
> > > Aren't these really the same thing? Either way we're saying the bridge
> > > itself doesn't handle MSIs, it's just in one case we're effectively
> > > encoding a platform-specific assumption that an external domain won't
> > > be provided. I can't help wondering whether that distinction is really
> > > necessary...
> > 
> > There is a subtle difference: no_msi indicates that there is no way
> > *any* MSI can be dealt with whatsoever (maybe because the RC doesn't
> > forward the corresponding TLPs?). msi_domain says "no MSI unless...".
> > 
> > We could implement the former with the latter, but I have the feeling
> > that's not totally bullet proof. Happy to revisit this if you think it
> > really matters.
> 
> IIUC msi_domain == 1 means: this host bridge needs an msi_domain to enable
> MSIs, which in turn means that there are bridges that do _not_ require
> an msi_domain to enable MSIs. I don't know how other arches handle the 
> msi_domain pointer but I am asking whether making:
> 
> if (bridge->no_msi || !bus->dev.msi_domain))
> 	bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
> 
> is a possibility (removing the need for the msi_domain flag).
> 
> At least this looks more like an arch property than a host bridge
> specific property (eg patch [13] pci_host_common_probe() may be used on
> arches other than ARM where it is not necessary true that it requires an
> msi_domain to enable MSIs).
> 
> I agree that's complicated to untangle - just asking if there is way
> to simplify it.

I tried to simplify that in the past (see the original discussion at
[1]), and tglx reported some breakages on systems that do not use MSI
domains, which is why we ended up with an explicit flag.

What I have done for now is to go with Robin's proposal of dropping
'no_msi' and rely on solely on 'msi_domain' to set
PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI when no domain is found.

Note that if we indeed have a host bridge that uses
pci_host_common_probe() that doesn't use MSI domains, we may indeed
run into problems. I don't have a good way around that, unfortunately.

Thanks,

	M.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201031140330.83768-1-linux@fw-web.de

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

[PATCH v2 13/15] PCI/MSI: Make pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI domains

[Marc Zyngier]

The generic PCI host driver relies on MSI domains for MSIs to
be provided to its end-points. Make this dependency explicit.

This cures the warnings occuring on arm/arm64 VMs when booted
with PCI virtio devices and no MSI controller (no GICv3 ITS,
for example).

It is likely that other drivers will need to express the same
dependency.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
index 6ab694f8d283..d3924a44db02 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ int pci_host_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	bridge->sysdata = cfg;
 	bridge->ops = (struct pci_ops *)&ops->pci_ops;
+	bridge->msi_domain = true;
 
 	return pci_host_probe(bridge);
 }
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 14/15] PCI/MSI: Document the various ways of ending up with NO_MSI

[Marc Zyngier]

We have now 4 ways of ending up with NO_MSI being set.
Document them.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index d9c73c173c14..425abcdfcaca 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -871,8 +871,16 @@ static int pci_msi_supported(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec)
 	 * Any bridge which does NOT route MSI transactions from its
 	 * secondary bus to its primary bus must set NO_MSI flag on
 	 * the secondary pci_bus.
-	 * We expect only arch-specific PCI host bus controller driver
-	 * or quirks for specific PCI bridges to be setting NO_MSI.
+	 *
+	 * The NO_MSI flag can either be set directly by:
+	 * - arch-specific PCI host bus controller drivers (deprecated)
+	 * - quirks for specific PCI bridges
+	 *
+	 * or indirectly by platform-specific PCI host bridge drivers by:
+	 * - unconditionally advertising the 'no_msi' property
+	 * - advertising the 'msi_domain' property, which results in
+	 *   the NO_MSI flag when no MSI domain is found for this bridge
+	 *   at probe time.
 	 */
 	for (bus = dev->bus; bus; bus = bus->parent)
 		if (bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 15/15] PCI: Refactor HT advertising of NO_MSI flag

[Marc Zyngier]

The few quirks that deal with NO_MSI tend to be copy-paste heavy.
Refactor them so that the hierarchy of conditions is slightly
cleaner.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/quirks.c | 15 ++++-----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index 653660e3ba9e..972bb0f9f994 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -2585,10 +2585,8 @@ static int msi_ht_cap_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev)
 /* Check the HyperTransport MSI mapping to know whether MSI is enabled or not */
 static void quirk_msi_ht_cap(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	if (dev->subordinate && !msi_ht_cap_enabled(dev)) {
-		pci_warn(dev, "MSI quirk detected; subordinate MSI disabled\n");
-		dev->subordinate->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
-	}
+	if (!msi_ht_cap_enabled(dev))
+		quirk_disable_msi(dev);
 }
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_HT2000_PCIE,
 			quirk_msi_ht_cap);
@@ -2601,9 +2599,6 @@ static void quirk_nvidia_ck804_msi_ht_cap(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
 
-	if (!dev->subordinate)
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Check HT MSI cap on this chipset and the root one.  A single one
 	 * having MSI is enough to be sure that MSI is supported.
@@ -2611,10 +2606,8 @@ static void quirk_nvidia_ck804_msi_ht_cap(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	pdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, 0);
 	if (!pdev)
 		return;
-	if (!msi_ht_cap_enabled(dev) && !msi_ht_cap_enabled(pdev)) {
-		pci_warn(dev, "MSI quirk detected; subordinate MSI disabled\n");
-		dev->subordinate->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
-	}
+	if (!msi_ht_cap_enabled(pdev))
+		quirk_msi_ht_cap(dev);
 	pci_dev_put(pdev);
 }
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NVIDIA_CK804_PCIE,
-- 
2.29.2