From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9430C43331 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707F620733 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Cp0OrNxS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730122AbgC3NKR (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:10:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:37616 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729862AbgC3NKQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:10:16 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g23so17923629otq.4 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:10:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hGlDXdBHMw1qoy2zN/RQsEFlUWvXjas4etDdjz865Ak=; b=Cp0OrNxSarOR54AxbhUxsgBtbID45Novdh5RPJp1Li4GdhRXfWeuGXVYsUn0qXXgqT buClIU91hQmxhz9wXPKrQwUxUqLP4TFl139gRaAAzR41fsWyuOfLtBvrSlWuRZRWaNyU fynb2HSTToTF07+XCwrNQoFMFWkOnlCXWkkiqL+H5C1VjsMvovk1cuv0Urrj0WAWOTxU A4RTbIzBPPbhAbt9D0KGXsNCkvBIpwsC3fNONbZ5CYpDmqdqLfyp5sxrPFou7JfCcpa8 cjdzuAOkv6OWz7Sq3I65NIj0+lfvDRJD/hJHD1xTmpIFAfv99p/Vxo/A2DfBbq/LG1yN 8oQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hGlDXdBHMw1qoy2zN/RQsEFlUWvXjas4etDdjz865Ak=; b=oHj7/3XOIRhROqzRe9F4qfSc+z+zWZ00HMeltDXcD8g6aPup9LMDhEUP8Adqj5tjUG DDw4wHBUhgOJlTLkEB+pFLpskMS46rDfUN3qxMvkQ4XzvrmlvmJt9a2nx3r3JnfBocg+ 8hYjkz0TLRXW70XHRZ51MVadDLk3AX9XCDb9oUvFBiyqheURK1SArfoTF12XV2zurZrq sq4y2fwnhpp7m6kU44+800Sg9A+0vMKUkss+KrqwXI7OfFZRNdOvJdFGRUsTLo21NT+H jyYYjOfPsV3MivA/bR2TMsangHTSzyaQLdDYRwoyyXCJcbDMSzHOpD0Lu94wSYQAlsJI F/Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1m3zXKpsJlP0kbyWzP4cQCVIYdHvgOYnRBLXUZRsx5hYAGsXc0 jUnH+AlHRL1ivKJ6LphJrCc8yGC9G7x+GXdBFPE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu3oaPdXG8s5bLmEqpy1iMZCzdGmZ0lgleJ3oy5FbvlUEsVqOWi/m2SWCVeYeFgz9q2WxPt1QUptWpfdxk+Jo0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:64cd:: with SMTP id n13mr9092038otl.274.1585573815578; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:10:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <83024641-7bd3-b47f-cd2c-0d831279086d@ti.com> <60deaab7-fe56-0f30-a8bd-fbeea9224b11@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <60deaab7-fe56-0f30-a8bd-fbeea9224b11@ti.com> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:09:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PCIe EPF To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-pci Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi Kishon, On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:59 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On 3/29/2020 7:34 PM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > > Hi Kishon, > > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 6:44 PM Lad, Prabhakar > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Kishon, > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:41 PM Lad, Prabhakar > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Kishon, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:58 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Prabhakar, > >>>> > >>>> On 3/22/2020 4:19 AM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > >>>>> Hi Kishon, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:28 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Prabhakar, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 3/18/2020 5:07 PM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi Kishon, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I rebased my rcar-endpoint patches on endpoint branch, which has > >>>>>>> support for streaming DMA API support, with this read/write/copy > >>>>>>> tests failed, to make sure nothing hasn't changed on my driver I > >>>>>>> reverted the streaming DMA API patch > >>>>>>> 74b9b4da84c71418ceeaaeb78dc790376df92fea "misc: pci_endpoint_test: Use > >>>>>>> streaming DMA APIs for buffer allocation" and tests began to pass > >>>>>>> again. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If add a GFP_DMA flag for kzalloc (with streaming DMA), the test cases > >>>>>>> for read/write/copy pass as expected. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Could you please through some light why this could be happening. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you see any differences in the address returned by dma_map_single() like is > >>>>>> it 32-bit address or 64-bit address? > >>>>>> > >>>>> Both return 32 bit address, debugging further I see that with > >>>>> GFP_KERNEL flag for small buffer > >>>>> sizes the read/write/copy tests pass(upto 4k), so I am suspecting its > >>>>> related to caching probably. > >>>>> Also adding wmb()/rmb() just with GFP_KERNEL flag didn't help. Note I > >>>>> am using PIO transfers. > >>>>> Any thoughts on how we tackle it ? > >>>>> > >>>>> # With GFP_KERNEL flag > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r > >>>>> [ 46.210649] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff0004b4ae0000 dma:7e99d000 align:ffff0004b4ae0000 > >>>>> READ ( 102400 bytes): NOT OKAY > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r > >>>>> [ 51.880063] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff0004b4ae0000 dma:7e9c0000 align:ffff0004b4ae0000 > >>>>> READ ( 102400 bytes): OKAY > >>>> > >>>> Here one of the read test is passing and the other is failing. > >>>> For the 1st case dma:7e99d000, address is aligned to 4K > >>>> For the 2nd case dma:7e9c0000, address is aligned to 256K > >>>> > >>>> I'm suspecting this could be an alignment issue. Does the outbound ATU of your > >>>> EP has any restrictions? (like the address should be aligned to the size?). > >>>> > >>> There isn't any restriction for outbound ATU on ep, Although I tried > >>> alignment from > >>> SZ_1 - SZ_256K and each failed at several points. > >>> > >>> With GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA, as in my previous dump here the address too > >>> is not aligned to 256 but still read passes. > >>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r -s 16384 > >>> [ 186.629347] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>> kzalloc:ffff00003b848000 dma:7b848000 align:ffff00003b848000 > >>> READ ( 16384 bytes): OKAY > >>> > >>> And I have verified with GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA on my platform > >>> everything works as expected, > >>> > >>> So how about a patch for pci_endpoint_test.c, where flags are passed > >>> as part of driver_data and it defaults to just GFP_KERNEL ? > >>> > >> Any thoughts on the above ? I intended to get the endpoint driver for v5.7. > >> > > Correct me if I am wrong here, streaming DMA API should be used with > > dma (-d) option so that root device > > makes sure the data is synced when data is transferred whereas > > previously with dma_alloc_coherent() > > we didn't have to care about cache issues. Also for a non-dma (-d) > > option we don't have a handle to dma > > in rootpport device so that we can call a sync operation. I say this > > because on my platform with streaming > > DMA api it works for small size buffers but it doesn't work with large > > size buffers. > > Streaming DMA API and DMA support in endpoint can be treated independently. > dma_alloc_coherent() will give you coherent memory, so you don't have to flush > or invalidate. This memory is usually limited in a platform. > The other option was to use streaming DMA APIs which doesn't give coherent > memory but SW has to take care of flush and invalidate. > Agreed. But we don't flush in SW when -d option is not specified I am assuming when we us -d dma engine takes care of flushing it. > > > > Could you please confirm with streaming DMA api without DMA (-d) > > option for large buffers read/write/copy > > still passes for you. > > root@j7-evm:~# ./pcitest -r > READ ( 102400 bytes): OKAY > root@j7-evm:~# ./pcitest -r -s 1024000 > READ (1024000 bytes): OKAY > root@j7-evm:~# ./pcitest -w -s 1024000 > WRITE (1024000 bytes): OKAY > root@j7-evm:~# ./pcitest -c -s 1024000 > COPY (1024000 bytes): OKAY > root@j7-evm:~# ./pcitest -c -s 10240000 > COPY (10240000 bytes): OKAY > root@j7-evm:~# ./pcitest -r -s 10240000 > READ (10240000 bytes): OKAY > root@j7-evm:~# ./pcitest -w -s 10240000 > WRITE (10240000 bytes): OKAY Thank you for testing is this on Jacinto ? > > > > Although I am not sure why adding GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA flag for > > kzalloc on my platform fixes everything. > > Which host do you use? If this is only a host side limitation, you could try > using a different host. > I am trying this on Renesas RZ/G2N as host and RZ/G2E as an endpoint. ATM I can only test this on Renesas platforms only and all of them have same PCIe controller :( How about adding flags as part of driver data and defaulting it GFP_KERNEL ? Cheers, --Prabhakar > Thanks > Kishon > > > > > Cheers, > > --Prabhakar > > > > > >> Cheers, > >> --Prabhakar > >> > >>> Cheers, > >>> --Prabhakar > >>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Kishon > >>>> > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r > >>>>> [ 53.354830] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff0004b4ae0000 dma:7e9e2000 align:ffff0004b4ae0000 > >>>>> READ ( 102400 bytes): NOT OKAY > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r > >>>>> [ 55.307236] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff0004b4ae0000 dma:7ea04000 align:ffff0004b4ae0000 > >>>>> READ ( 102400 bytes): NOT OKAY > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r > >>>>> [ 57.098626] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff0004b4ae0000 dma:7ea23000 align:ffff0004b4ae0000 > >>>>> READ ( 102400 bytes): NOT OKAY > >>>>> > >>>>> # GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA > >>>>> > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r -s 1024001 > >>>>> [ 174.562071] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff00003b900000 dma:7b900000 align:ffff00003b900000 > >>>>> READ (1024001 bytes): OKAY > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r -s 16384 > >>>>> [ 186.629347] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff00003b848000 dma:7b848000 align:ffff00003b848000 > >>>>> READ ( 16384 bytes): OKAY > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r -s 8192 > >>>>> [ 190.578335] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff00003b840000 dma:7b840000 align:ffff00003b840000 > >>>>> READ ( 8192 bytes): OKAY > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# pcitest -r -s 128 > >>>>> [ 199.428021] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: pci_endpoint_test_read > >>>>> kzalloc:ffff00003b800000 dma:7b800000 align:ffff00003b800000 > >>>>> READ ( 128 bytes): OKAY > >>>>> root@hihope-rzg2m:~# > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> --Prabhakar > >>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> Kishon