From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFF2C32751 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 15:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598E12085A for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 15:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GQHnk6Y1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726066AbfHJPQo (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Aug 2019 11:16:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:38042 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726024AbfHJPQo (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Aug 2019 11:16:44 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id d17so144161179oth.5; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:16:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9xghbNPnABIn3IsnFfs8INVPgZBhjMcp5cyTaz7Y7CY=; b=GQHnk6Y1/WpEGjLizA/9lEth/P9rZzhMhCbWfrtvpztugcBDGfO6BFCBH1RfMWJDQU cIXaWyw/tzK7o8jfM4pZSohgjWmrPqB8P46nnvLukeAi+DTvIRgaJC+jVbR+JtBuC2J3 ghAvWSw+E7DJ1mYQzz4pn4VoTdESWFlPwOw51Mw6t98KvTOj7GUSrS2WZNh7UCU6Ye+1 c0dud1kHubFnvoQT/ZL15XKRs9vViliMhUAZkviGJM/IdcTE34168sqaAv4ITnEfqSkc 4Tj/kijP/MxM0RBY7u7ng3QXJBdUXcdwqsfgS6Vde0nsYYqyyxoCOIwxEsR89L6FA78L tL1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9xghbNPnABIn3IsnFfs8INVPgZBhjMcp5cyTaz7Y7CY=; b=NzU0bCHEhxMvmJSeQK+BuAk8tymXb/I5+icyqq2wq28YYzHOwoEZdiojVZgwxqNaq2 e6VsEf13YEhYTS1onOzoMSr4fEpXftWY1Quue9aUoBp9d7Uy130jwlrUKVa8mx8FsmOL SAw3K0LtnsRxydydQVeNq0sOe3qaJpx0kXwmcklpNCxnUOb7pC2LjqI/YyPVzSP1/Bqo mct0/ydiKQXBnOytSOHfPXCl0b+D4dTONnwex96ojsg2vJI6wfOZ1Kln43eSa8s4i0PN n9d3ATzRVz77hcOkPmTzkNEOfNvq4P2TYbJbP4jkpKa1kFymb8tHrfxdlXHN68LmJbyg apPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXMOPjUPHmdW9wR0tBLEBoKtmaKE7CuTH3EPNJt9uNJscxSNcc8 EKIPMB4WjSwvN9tZfWiHXZapcmsWFt0NAkpilIA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUxQ8Jnl1txgA2LO/XXluKgQETVSBhlQunQ9J1bpkIh5ywpBDnH1Mr7qCNwg5m9gYlhmSB8uDP3jiNK633Y4Q= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ee0f:: with SMTP id i15mr15836713ioh.91.1565450202993; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 08:16:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mikhail Gavrilov Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 20:16:31 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 201517] New: pcieport 0000:00:03.1: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:00.0 To: bjorn@helgaas.com Cc: Keith Busch , Oza Pawandeep , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, emteeelp@gmail.com, Linux List Kernel Mailing Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 04:36, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [Forwarding this to linux-pci since nobody really monitors the bugzilla] > > Possibly the same issue reported here: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109691 > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111601 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1588428/ > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20160215171423.GA12641@localhost/ > > I had a theory about the problem (see the lore.kernel link above), but > that was before a lot of AER rework, and I haven't checked the code > since then. Thanks for the response. I have tested the system several months with the kernel command line "pci=noaer". And the error "pcieport 0000:00:03.1: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:00.0" not happened all testing time. Which is your theory about this issue? -- Best Regards, Mike Gavrilov.