linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] PCI: Try to allocate mem64 above 4G at first
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 10:55:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWUrkKEpLmEn9kzkKOtEtX7-R8shdVSKGgSyHezKpzJCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo46fCCFCijNfMzGYP__pP6hkPFurMS=1=wSAZsg5z0-Lg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
>>> I think we should fix this with a separate patch that removes
>>> PCIBIOS_MAX_MEM_32 altogether, replacing this use with an explicit
>>> 0xffffffff (or some other "max 32-bit value" symbol).  I don't think
>>> there's anything arch-specific about this.
>>>
>>> So I'd like to see two patches here:
>>>  1) Avoid allocating 64-bit regions for 32-bit BARs
>>>  2) Try to allocate regions above 4GB for 64-bit BARs
>>
>> Sure. please check updated two patches.
>
> I think the first one looks good.
>
> I'm curious about the second.  Why did you add the IORESOURCE_MEM
> test?  That's doesn't affect the "start =" piece because
> IORESOURCE_MEM is always set if IORESOURCE_MEM_64 is set.
>
> But it does affect the "end =" part.  Previously we limited all I/O
> and 32-bit mem BARs to the low 4GB.  This patch makes it so we limit
> 32-bit mem BARs to the low 4GB, but we don't limit I/O BARs.  But I/O
> BARs can only have 32 bits of address, so it seems like we should
> limit them the same way as 32-bit mem BARs.  So I expected something
> like this:
>
>    if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
>        start = (resource_size_t) (1ULL << 32);
>        end = PCI_MAX_RESOURCE;
>    } else {
>        start = 0;
>        end = PCI_MAX_RESOURCE_32;
>    }

x86 are using 16bits.

some others use 32 bits.
#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0xffffffff

ia64 and sparc are using 64bits.
#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT               0xffffffffffffffffUL

but pci only support 16bits and 32bits.

maybe later we can add
PCI_MAX_RESOURCE_16

to handle 16bits and 32bit io ports.

Yinghai

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-29 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-23  6:34 [PATCH 00/11] PCI: resource allocation related Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 01/11] PCI: Should add children device res to fail list Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 02/11] PCI: Try to allocate mem64 above 4G at first Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23 15:57   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 17:30     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23 18:40       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-25  4:36         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-25 17:53           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-25 18:39             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-25 19:37               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-25 20:18                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-25 20:19                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-25 21:55                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-25 21:58                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-25 22:14                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-25 23:10                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-26  0:12                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-26 15:01                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-29 17:56                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-29 17:55                         ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2012-05-29 17:57                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-29 18:17                             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-29 19:03                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-29 20:46                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-29 20:50                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-01 23:30                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-04  1:05                                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-05  2:37                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-05  4:50                                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-05  5:04                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06  9:44                                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-06-06 16:18                                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]                                                   ` <CAGLnvc_ejMWiiubVMo7DLz5ZVn1iMbf67FB4H7crRCCTRRqt2A@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-04  3:00                                                     ` joeyli
2012-05-29 20:53                                   ` David Miller
2012-05-29 19:23                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-29 20:40                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-29 23:24                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-29 23:27                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-29 23:33                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-29 23:47                                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-30  7:40                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-30 16:27                                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-30 16:30                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-30 16:33                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 03/11] intel-gtt: Read 64bit for gmar_bus_addr Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  7:21   ` Dave Airlie
2012-05-23  7:44     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 04/11] PCI: Make sure assign same align with large size resource at first Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 05/11] resources: Split out __allocate_resource() Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 06/11] resource: make find_resource could return just fit resource Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 07/11] PCI: Don't allocate small resource in big empty space Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 08/11] resource: only return range with needed align Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 09/11] PCI: Add is_pci_iov_resource_idx() Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 10/11] PCI: Sort unassigned resources with correct alignment Yinghai Lu
2012-05-23  6:34 ` [PATCH 11/11] PCI: Treat ROM resource as optional during assigning Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAE9FiQWUrkKEpLmEn9kzkKOtEtX7-R8shdVSKGgSyHezKpzJCw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steve@snewbury.org.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).