linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
To: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Randy Wu <Randy.Wu@mediatek.com>,
	youlin.pei@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add support for MT8195
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:07:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5GMTbC5TTgURhPAvxBEY18S6-T-BZ9CpXsO91Trim7TXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1622526594.9054.6.camel@mhfsdcap03>

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 1:50 PM Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 11:53 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:50 AM Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > MT8195 is an ARM platform SoC which has the same PCIe IP with MT8192.
> >
> > Based on what I'm seeing internally, there seems to be some inconsistency
> > across the MediaTek platform on whether new compatible strings should be
> > introduced for "fully compatible" IP blocks.
> >
> > If this hardware block in MT8195 is "the same" as the one in MT8192, do we
> > really need the new compatible string? Are there any concerns?
>
> Hi Chen-Yu,
>
> It's ok to reuse the compatible string with MT8192, but I think this
> will be easier to find which platforms this driver is compatible with,
> especially when we have more and more platforms in the future.

If it's just for informational purposes, then having the MT8192 compatible
as a fallback would work, and we wouldn't need to make changes to the driver.
This works better especially if we have to support multiple operating systems
that use device tree.

So we would want

    "mediatek,mt8195-pcie", "mediatek,mt8192-pcie"

and

    "mediatek,mt8192-pcie"

be the valid options.

Personally I'm not seeing enough value to justify adding the compatible string
just for informational purposes though. One could easily discern which hardware
is used by looking at the device tree.


Regards
ChenYu


> Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > ChenYu
> >
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-gen3.yaml | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-gen3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-gen3.yaml
> > > index e7b1f9892da4..d5e4a3e63d97 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-gen3.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-gen3.yaml
> > > @@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ allOf:
> > >
> > >  properties:
> > >    compatible:
> > > -    const: mediatek,mt8192-pcie
> > > +    oneOf:
> > > +      - const: mediatek,mt8192-pcie
> > > +      - const: mediatek,mt8195-pcie
> > >
> > >    reg:
> > >      maxItems: 1
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-01  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01  2:44 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add controller support for MT8195 Jianjun Wang
2021-06-01  2:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add " Jianjun Wang
2021-06-01  3:53   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-06-01  5:49     ` Jianjun Wang
2021-06-01  6:07       ` Chen-Yu Tsai [this message]
2021-06-02 11:33         ` Matthias Brugger
2021-06-22 11:05           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-06-23  9:02             ` Jianjun Wang
2021-06-01  2:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add controller " Jianjun Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGXv+5GMTbC5TTgURhPAvxBEY18S6-T-BZ9CpXsO91Trim7TXw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=wenst@chromium.org \
    --cc=Randy.Wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).