From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: 5.10 regression caused by: "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev": many XHCI swiotlb buffer is full / DMAR: Device bounce map failed errors on thunderbolt connected XHCI controller
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:25:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGnHSEmyrw=r56ocLCkia+sYT0tmcCScZitBi=G+DY=gRBy+sg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fded04e2-f2e9-de92-ab1f-5aa088904e90@redhat.com>
Should we still be clamping max_sectors to dma_max_mapping_size(dev)
(for now)? with dev being us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev and
devinfo->udev->bus->sysdev respectively (i.e. revert only
scsi_add_host_with_dma() to scsi_add_host())?
On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 at 02:12, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/27/20 5:19 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:32:16PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> I ran some more tests, I can confirm that reverting:
> >>
> >> 5df7ef7d32fe "uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives"
> >> 558033c2828f "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev"
> >>
> >> Makes the problem go away while running a 5.10 kernel. I also tried doubling
> >> the swiotlb size by adding: swiotlb=65536 to the kernel commandline but that
> >> does not help.
> >>
> >> Some more observations:
> >>
> >> 1. The usb-storage driver does not cause this issue, even though it has a
> >> very similar change.
> >>
> >> 2. The problem does not happen until I plug an UAS decvice into the dock.
> >>
> >> 3. The problem continues to happen even after I unplug the UAS device and
> >> rmmod the uas module
> >>
> >> 3. made me take a bit closer look to the troublesome commit, it passes:
> >> udev->bus->sysdev, which I assume is the XHCI controller itself as device
> >> to scsi_add_host_with_dma, which in turn seems to cause permanent changes
> >> to the dma settings for the XHCI controller. I'm not all that familiar with
> >> the DMA APIs but I'm getting the feeling that passing the actual XHCI-controller's
> >> device as dma-device to scsi_add_host_with_dma is simply the wrong thing to
> >> do; and that the intended effects (honor XHCI dma limits, but do not cause
> >> any changes the XHCI dma settings) should be achieved differently.
> >>
> >> Note that if this is indeed wrong, the matching usb-storage change should
> >> likely also be dropped.
> >
> > One problem in this area is that the clamping of the DMA size through
> > dma_max_mapping_size mentioned in the commit log doesn't work when
> > swiotlb is called from intel-iommu. I think we need to wire up those
> > calls there as well.
>
> Ok, but that does not sound like a quick last minute fix for 5.10, so maybe
> for 5.10 we should just revert the uas and usb-storage changes which trigger
> this problem and then retry those for 5.11 ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-28 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 11:36 5.10 regression, many XHCI swiotlb buffer is full / DMAR: Device bounce map failed errors on thunderbolt connected XHCI controller Hans de Goede
2020-11-18 21:43 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-23 14:49 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-24 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-24 10:31 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-24 12:17 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-11-27 11:41 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-27 12:32 ` 5.10 regression caused by: "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev": " Hans de Goede
2020-11-27 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-27 18:12 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-28 1:25 ` Tom Yan [this message]
2020-11-28 10:43 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-28 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] uas: revert from scsi_add_host_with_dma() to scsi_add_host() Tom Yan
2020-11-28 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb-storage: " Tom Yan
2020-11-30 9:50 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 12:58 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 13:23 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 13:30 ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 13:36 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 13:53 ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 13:55 ` Hans de Goede
2020-12-04 15:02 ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 17:20 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-30 17:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-30 18:18 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 18:57 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 19:01 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 20:36 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-30 14:39 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 9:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] uas: " Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 19:30 ` Tom Yan
2020-12-01 11:09 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-28 17:15 ` 5.10 regression caused by: "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev": many XHCI swiotlb buffer is full / DMAR: Device bounce map failed errors on thunderbolt connected XHCI controller Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-30 8:43 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGnHSEmyrw=r56ocLCkia+sYT0tmcCScZitBi=G+DY=gRBy+sg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tom.ty89@gmail.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).