From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:14:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hn5EvwjPggCeUw+kjDNjdzx3eLP2PRBGKRAyo2eYECyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jqwgvmRrRts4Nf4ySmrp5gwmv_iJWBh3OjN54ZU+qneQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 9:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is the third version of my patches to simplify the _OSC
> > negotiation of PCIe features between Linux and the firmware.
> >
> > This version is a complete rewrite, so there is no changelog to the
> > previous version. Patches 1-3 are cleanups and small restructurings of
> > the code as a preparation for patch 4.
> >
> > The last patch gets rid of the dedicated _OSC query to check for _OSC
> > support and merges that functionality into acpi_pci_osc_control_set().
> >
> > This allows to simplify and/or remove other functions and consilidate
> > error handling in negotiate_os_control().
> >
> > I have tested the patches with and without 'pcie_ports=compat' and
> > found no regressions on my test machine.
>
> I have reviewed the patches, so if you want me to queue up this
> series, please let me know.
Should I assume that Bjorn will be taking it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-13 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten functions Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-01 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-13 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-09-14 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-14 13:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-28 21:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29 8:09 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0hn5EvwjPggCeUw+kjDNjdzx3eLP2PRBGKRAyo2eYECyQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).