From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] PCI/PM: Write 0 to PMCSR in pci_power_up() in all cases
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 20:52:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iteW2K0c7pS+ar1K_iL9L3ujQx=-ZRdrZFzxvkMVZorA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220526194601.GA344086@bhelgaas>
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:46 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:54:22AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 08:10:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Make pci_power_up() write 0 to the device's PCI_PM_CTRL register in
> > > order to put it into D0 regardless of the power state returned by
> > > the previous read from that register which should not matter.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 +++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > > @@ -1230,15 +1230,10 @@ int pci_power_up(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * If we're (effectively) in D3, force entire word to 0. This doesn't
> > > - * affect PME_Status, disables PME_En, and sets PowerState to 0.
> > > + * Force the entire word to 0. This doesn't affect PME_Status, disables
> > > + * PME_En, and sets PowerState to 0.
> > > */
> > > - if (state == PCI_D3hot)
> > > - pmcsr = 0;
> > > - else
> > > - pmcsr &= ~PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK;
> > > -
> > > - pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, pmcsr);
> > > + pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, 0);
> >
> > Can you reassure me why this is safe and useful?
> >
> > This is a 16-bit write that includes (PCIe r6.0, sec 7.5.2.2):
> >
> > 0x0003 PowerState RW
> > 0x0004 RsvdP
> > 0x0008 No_Soft_Reset RO
> > 0x00f0 RsvdP
> > 0x0100 PME_En RW/RWS
> > 0x1e00 Data_Select RW, VF ROZ
> > 0x6000 Data_Scale RO, VF ROZ
> > 0x8000 PME_Status RW1CS
> >
> > We intend to set PowerState to 0 (D0), apparently intend to clear
> > PME_En, and PME_Status is "write 1 to clear" to writing 0 does
> > nothing, so those look OK.
> >
> > But the RsvdP fields are reserved for future RW bits and should be
> > preserved, and it looks like clearing Data_Select could potentially
> > break the Data Register power consumption reporting (which I don't
> > think we support today).
> >
> > It seems like maybe we should do this instead:
> >
> > pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL,
> > pmcsr & ~PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK)
> >
> > to just unconditionally clear PowerState?
>
> Or I guess this, since we want to clear PME_En as well?
>
> pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, pmcsr &
> ~(PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK | PCI_PM_CTRL_PME_ENABLE));
Yes.
Also, this patch actually only makes a difference if the device is
going into D0 from D1 or D2, because we have always written 0 to the
PMCSR during transitions from D3hot.
It is inconsistent and confusing to do different things depending on
the initial power state here and the code is simpler when 0 is written
regardless.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-27 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-05 17:57 [PATCH v1 00/11] PCI/PM: Rework powering up PCI devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:00 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] PCI/PM: Split pci_raw_set_power_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:02 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] PCI/PM: Relocate pci_set_low_power_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] PCI/PM: Set current_state to D3cold if the device is not accessible Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:05 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] PCI/PM: Unfold pci_platform_power_transition() in pci_power_up() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:09 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] PCI/PM: Do not call pci_update_current_state() from pci_power_up() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:10 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] PCI/PM: Write 0 to PMCSR in pci_power_up() in all cases Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-26 16:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-26 19:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-27 18:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-05-27 22:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-27 23:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-28 13:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:13 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] PCI/PM: Split pci_power_up() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] PCI/PM: Do not restore BARs if device is not in D0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:15 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] PCI/PM: Clean up pci_set_low_power_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:16 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] PCI/PM: Rearrange pci_set_power_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 18:18 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] PCI/PM: Replace pci_set_power_state() in pci_pm_thaw_noirq() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-05 19:22 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] PCI/PM: Rework powering up PCI devices Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-05 19:44 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0iteW2K0c7pS+ar1K_iL9L3ujQx=-ZRdrZFzxvkMVZorA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).