From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AC8C433B4 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E2C61438 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234726AbhEMPQr (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 11:16:47 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:37335 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234428AbhEMPQp (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 11:16:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [213.165.67.97]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N9MYu-1lT2ED3p5A-015FyW for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 17:15:33 +0200 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id s8so27254962wrw.10 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:15:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322poaRTzCAILJ2gUpYmssZxefIqhMIThD3+GPdqJrjf7Aoli02 H8UAU3w8PCwO1qpG5gX/hKecXU+usD58POK9Xi4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQIsBT9n8Qkj2JRhpEkNMCgRHl4RyaQVCnBwy+J0RrUs+Tqidp+lcBJmgQJZwvMw73SnrC55cVRHiizLTT1rk= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6dc4:: with SMTP id d4mr53976888wrz.105.1620918933677; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:15:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210513151341.GZ1336@shell.armlinux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20210513151341.GZ1336@shell.armlinux.org.uk> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:14:33 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dynamically map ECAM regions To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Linux ARM , linux-pci Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Qvgt6NwUS4CiGVW3xFjYqkuZPlvglmjxfbe5lZbBPF8qVAg3sRn 9Lt0LAcGYKehyzqprWkRjSHDOfX5jfI0mBlMfZYfjIeocyudOHYXcwjcp/oqCzszgoYz/vW +RS6eIMnm3MgKA+ptm3nmWXsiyoqBHQPz47QwUW3H7GFXWDHi45GnmlzqBhU5tq1BMQuZEp +cRHGThLlVUAckhcEHWUw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:E82Yh9uBhCk=:Lf4hu0bgRfnMmcHNaR++kq LpQKy2peHKoWqwPtqtrBd0mGCAXXUh3JuElsanXS6GpKy/wMSB/M99DsxKSqus6NnRZNX41PK OS8nDYqS0qca2F+sYRsc4Gav0FZGVWqWBfhq+NguyPAJIldDRgTVES1xMgV1+eI1V483lItf3 BVVdkKnZHcooXWRuqu0xJwYqPOs3NeoOhvLGFZTQHCigk6fp1PFcFa7+fruXARXXGL39qhS2d zsyoqnPtyZcn4IidwfInZlUrtq+lcsorCW3r2LoCfshNUYUg+O4ol6lr8QmdARznlc0SuFV3e EebvmU+YidRs70aY+EFWK5l3ghYqBMVnFplfFD70+7iqfSHa2Bn+OFnHnvGxdOdqnMwQz81ai vhcn5ok0vpP27n1V5MZllJhhzAP5Yrpf6dJoF5Udy7ojoNyKIPe4oPONS4goVIKi89iNetrf0 haBQhFZiL/L7kDHZtnDHgH+EntlPnOt0kfNnLPPsXVjZy/5TUOBlptpd2IOkl7o9S1WsOA1ns YucwfotS+tpPAlJOnLcufM= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:13 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > > > Looks good to me. I wonder if we should actually mark this for stable > > backports. It is a somewhat invasive change, so there is a regression > > risk, but it's also likely that others will run into this problem on distro > > kernels. > > Maybe merge it first, wait a release cycle, and then request it for > stable if we think it's of benefit? Yes, sounds good. Arnd