linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	gregkh <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: of: Avoid pci_remap_iospace() when PCI_IOBASE not defined
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:04:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0vFvn_KUQAT8MuOQuopWmiUrSX4bSP0zorjoBJwTTLWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMhs-H_hGeGZN_-1GhkhD5wahSoJFd+PrEMXx3C7zvJireJ=xg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:45 PM Sergio Paracuellos
<sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:28 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 2:46 PM Sergio Paracuellos
> >
> > Ok, sounds good. I would still suggest using
> > "#define PCI_IOBASE mips_io_port_base", so it has the same meaning
> > as on other architectures (the virtual address of port 0), and replace
> > the hardcoded base with the CPU address you read from DT to
> > make that code more portable. As a general rule, DT-enabled drivers
> > should contain no hardcoded addresses.
>
> Yes, it must be cleaned. I was only explaining a possible way to proceed.

Ok

> So, the changes would be:
> 1) Reverting already added two commits in staging-tree [0] and [1].
> (two revert patches)
> 2) Setting PCI_IOBASE to 'mips_io_port_base' so the spaces.h become: (one patch)
>
> $ cat arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ralink/spaces.h
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> #ifndef __ASM_MACH_RALINK_SPACES_H_
> #define __ASM_MACH_RALINK_SPACES_H_
>
> #define PCI_IOBASE    mips_io_port_base
> #define PCI_IOSIZE    SZ_16M
> #define IO_SPACE_LIMIT  (PCI_IOSIZE - 1)

As a minor comment, I would make the PCI_IOSIZE only 64KB in this
case, unless plan to support ralink/mediatek SoCs that have a multiple
PCIe domains with distinct 64KB windows.

> 3) Change the value written in RALINK_PCI_IOBASE to be sure the value
> written takes into account address before linux port translation (one
> patch):
>
> pcie_write(pcie, entry->res->start - entry->offset, RALINK_PCI_IOBASE);

ok

> 4) Virtually Map cpu physical address 0x1e160000 and set
> 'mips_io_port_base' to that virtual address. Something like the
> following (one patch):
>
> static int mt7621_set_io(struct device *dev)
> {
>     struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
>     struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>     struct of_pci_range range;
>     unsigned long vaddr;
>     int ret = -EINVAL;
>
>     ret = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, node);
>     if (ret)
>         return ret;
>
>     for_each_of_pci_range(&parser, &range) {
>         switch (range.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS) {
>         case IORESOURCE_IO:
>             vaddr = (unsigned long)ioremap(range.cpu_addr, range.size);
>             set_io_port_base(vaddr);
>             ret = 0;
>             break;
>         }
>     }
>
>     return ret;
> }

This looks like it does the right thing, but conceptually this would belong into
the mips specific pci_remap_iospace() as we discussed a few emails back,
not inside the driver. pci_remap_iospace() does get the CPU address
as an argument, so it just needs to ioremap()/set_io_port_base() it.

> And now my concerns:
> 1) We have to read DT range IO values in the driver and those values
> will be also parsed by core apis but converting them to linux io
> ports. Should this be done by the driver or is there a better way to
> abstract this to don't do things twice?
> 2) 'set_io_port_base()' function does what we want but it is only
> mips. We already have the iocu stuff there and the driver is mips
> anyway, but it is worth to comment this just in case.

I think in both cases the core APIs should do what we need, with the
change to the mips pci_remap_iospace() I mention. If there is anything
missing in the core API that you need, we can discuss extending those,
e.g. to store additional data in the pci_host_bridge structure.

         Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-24 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-22  4:20 [PATCH v3] PCI: of: Avoid pci_remap_iospace() when PCI_IOBASE not defined Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-22 15:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-22 17:42   ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-22 18:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-22 18:40       ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-22 19:57         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-22 20:55           ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-23  5:51             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-23  6:36               ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-23  9:07                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-23 11:08                   ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-23 13:26                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-23 14:55                       ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-23 17:55                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-23 20:32                           ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-24  8:53                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-24 10:15                               ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-24 11:39                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-24 12:46                                   ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-24 13:27                                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-24 16:45                                       ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-24 16:47                                         ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-09-24 17:04                                         ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-09-24 17:15                                           ` Sergio Paracuellos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a0vFvn_KUQAT8MuOQuopWmiUrSX4bSP0zorjoBJwTTLWA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).