From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:32964 "EHLO mail-yk0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754651AbbFWP3u (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:29:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000301d0a910$09d9bd60$1d8d3820$@com> References: <000301d0a910$09d9bd60$1d8d3820$@com> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:29:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/address: use atomic allocation in pci_register_io_range() To: Jingoo Han Cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Liviu Dudau , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > When kzalloc() is called under spin_lock(), GFP_ATOMIC should be > used to avoid sleeping allocation. > The call tree is: > of_pci_range_to_resource() > --> pci_register_io_range() <-- takes spin_lock(&io_range_lock); > --> kzalloc() > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han Applied. Thanks. Rob > --- > drivers/of/address.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c > index 78a7dcb..65c3289 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/address.c > +++ b/drivers/of/address.c > @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ int __weak pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size) > } > > /* add the range to the list */ > - range = kzalloc(sizeof(*range), GFP_KERNEL); > + range = kzalloc(sizeof(*range), GFP_ATOMIC); > if (!range) { > err = -ENOMEM; > goto end_register; > -- > 1.9.1 > >