linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Victor Ding <victording@google.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@genesyslogic.com.tw>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Levin <levinale@google.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	"Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Sukumar Ghorai <sukumar.ghorai@intel.com>,
	Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM until its LTR and L1ss state is restored
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:16:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANqTbdb4gZYQUAZzatwymy-S9Ajb=PhfP53_D2TYLJp0zw4HxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112223228.GA1857596@bjorn-Precision-5520>

Hi Bjorn,

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:32 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Victor,
>
> Thanks for the patch.  Improving suspend/resume performance is always
> a good thing!
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:02:04AM +0000, Victor Ding wrote:
> > Right after powering up, the device may have ASPM enabled; however,
> > its LTR and/or L1ss controls may not be in the desired states; hence,
> > the device may enter L1.2 undesirably and cause resume performance
> > penalty. This is especially problematic if ASPM related control
> > registers are modified before a suspension.
>
> s/L1ss/L1SS/ (several occurrences) to match existing usage.
>
I'll update it in the next version.
>
> > Therefore, ASPM should disabled until its LTR and L1ss states are
> > fully restored.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Ding <victording@google.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c       | 11 +++++++++++
> >  drivers/pci/pci.h       |  2 ++
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index eb323af34f1e..428de433f2e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -1660,6 +1660,17 @@ void pci_restore_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >       if (!dev->state_saved)
> >               return;
> >
> > +     /*
> > +      * Right after powering up, the device may have ASPM enabled;
>
> I think this could be stated more precisely.  "Right after powering
> up," ASPM should be *disabled* because ASPM Control in the Link
> Control register powers up as zero (disabled).
>
Good suggestion; I'll reword in the next version.
However, ASPM should be *disabled* for the opposite reason - ASPM Control
in the Link Control register *may* power as non-zero (enabled).
(More answered in the next section)
>
> > +      * however, its LTR and/or L1ss controls may not be in the desired
> > +      * states; as a result, the device may enter L1.2 undesirably and
> > +      * cause resume performance penalty.
> > +      * Therefore, ASPM is disabled until its LTR and L1ss states are
> > +      * fully restored.
> > +      * (enabling ASPM is part of pci_restore_pcie_state)
>
> If we're enabling L1.2 before LTR has been configured, that's
> definitely a bug.  But I don't see how that happens.  The current code
> looks like:
>
>   pci_restore_state
>     pci_restore_ltr_state
>       pci_write_config_word(dev, ltr + PCI_LTR_MAX_SNOOP_LAT, *cap++)
>       pci_write_config_word(dev, ltr + PCI_LTR_MAX_NOSNOOP_LAT, *cap++)
>     pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state
>       pci_write_config_dword(dev, aspm_l1ss + PCI_L1SS_CTL1, *cap++)
>     pci_restore_pcie_state
>       pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, cap[i++])
>
> We *do* restore PCI_L1SS_CTL1, which contains "ASPM L1.2 Enable",
> before we restore PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, which contains "ASPM Control", but I
> don't think "ASPM L1.2 Enable" by itself should be enough to allow
> hardware to enter L1.2.
>
> Reading PCIe r5.0, sec 5.5.1, it seems like hardware should ignore the
> PCI_L1SS_CTL1 bits unless ASPM L1 entry is enabled in PCI_EXP_LNKCTL.
>
> What am I missing?
>
Correct; however, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL may power up as non-zero, i.e. has ASPM
Control enabled. BIOS may set PCI_EXP_LNKCTL (and PCI_L1SS_CTL1) before
Kernel takes control. When BIOS does so, there is a brief period
between powering
up and Kernel restoring LTR state that L1.2 is enabled but LTR isn't configured.
>
> > +      */
> > +     pcie_config_aspm_dev(dev, 0);
> > +
> >       /*
> >        * Restore max latencies (in the LTR capability) before enabling
> >        * LTR itself (in the PCIe capability).
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > index e9ea5dfaa3e0..f774bd6d2555 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > @@ -564,6 +564,7 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  void pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  void pcie_aspm_pm_state_change(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  void pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> > +void pcie_config_aspm_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 val);
> >  void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  void pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  #else
> > @@ -571,6 +572,7 @@ static inline void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> >  static inline void pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> >  static inline void pcie_aspm_pm_state_change(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> >  static inline void pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> > +static inline void pcie_config_aspm_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 val) { }
> >  static inline void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
> >  static inline void pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > index a08e7d6dc248..45535b4e1595 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ void pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >       pci_write_config_dword(dev, aspm_l1ss + PCI_L1SS_CTL2, *cap++);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void pcie_config_aspm_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 val)
> > +void pcie_config_aspm_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 val)
> >  {
> >       pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
> >                                          PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPMC, val);
> > --
> > 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-13  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-12  4:02 [PATCH 0/2] Disable ASPM on GL9750 during a suspension Victor Ding
2021-01-12  4:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM until its LTR and L1ss state is restored Victor Ding
2021-01-12 22:32   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-13  2:16     ` Victor Ding [this message]
2021-01-13 20:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-14  9:13         ` Victor Ding
2021-01-12  4:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-pci-gli: Disable ASPM during a suspension Victor Ding
2021-01-12 22:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-13  2:16     ` Victor Ding
2021-01-13 21:48       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-14  9:13         ` Victor Ding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANqTbdb4gZYQUAZzatwymy-S9Ajb=PhfP53_D2TYLJp0zw4HxQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=victording@google.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.chuang@genesyslogic.com.tw \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=levinale@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=sukumar.ghorai@intel.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).