From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C63C433C1 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 01:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE95461A50 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 01:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230045AbhCZBHl (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:07:41 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com ([209.85.167.49]:34306 "EHLO mail-lf1-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229962AbhCZBH2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:07:28 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id i26so5262280lfl.1; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:07:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9eLjWVT8hPiDtc1t+jEPlM4wV/caxcgGLiKcEJS4Ka8=; b=lT/qYEZVwCpBKpmj1psLipDJaWzGnZienRtEQ76KE+mYMsbU7vk+ImJ7XDF9HhpCD9 HMPdzyUPa9eYc0Vo+er2ULvVQ+5oHeipPUgcOs8rJgH3YpNPQKIz4uYQ2iq85CB3OUzI aXJr9+TDyLflot0BCi5nK5xJEK/wlxPv+Lb6rX+0qheAWlFzCKFSdXxRdqJ3vrHp87mh XTuRdUjULr9//NY7Iz414TlScpxRrrYiNr4KNLVXi9iLdaqCrBw0BLEY5RPzu8uUo7Ni PRx4WBSEsgOykJvvfy3Yy0HspLM8Z0lZUpA6W1Woak6SWhdtaD1/fqkvoGpTMMMq6QBL kidg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WpwvG8zgryH70zjK6DvimPECds0qWBewGMf50FF/vr+RD/xWU WLTBOORZDbBpMzk0NI2hILw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDqg8f8Sh3Q7LZP8/jDuT/gYmz27wVS9UDMznUpXBeFTFs0zt4yr/qTUJYO5Ad4QZBDSk/4A== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4883:: with SMTP id x3mr6344687lfc.419.1616720847133; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocinante ([95.155.85.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l12sm696423lfc.248.2021.03.25.18.07.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:07:25 +0100 From: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= To: Xiongfeng Wang Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, ruscur@russell.cc, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Correct function names in the header Message-ID: References: <20210325075144.180030-1-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210325075144.180030-1-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi, [...] > PCI: acpi_pcihp: Correct acpi_pci_check_ejectable() function name in > the header > PCI/AER: Correct function names in the header > PCI/PME: Correct pcie_pme_init() function name in the header > PCI/ATS: Correct pci_max_pasids() function name in header [...] All of this has already been fixed in the following series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210311001724.423356-1-kw@linux.com/ Krzysztof