From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23035C433B4 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE900613C1 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231718AbhDTL4M (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:56:12 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:13350 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231251AbhDTL4M (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:56:12 -0400 IronPort-SDR: dRdlpRLYzIG0dl+HZObUHa4AGjD3m3I1G9McZc6MIWhVslg3lkTnnVpiGOXE6IjCXcHrrPr4KN M1d0e7h2zj/w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9959"; a="216080517" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,236,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="216080517" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Apr 2021 04:55:40 -0700 IronPort-SDR: eqdJR0Z+KYTp2Lh8lgAxQf2fBxsMYAQFpBEefuDaRAiStsxvTQ/V2n2z2nowR9PKUs6BTiDxQL f9ebH8EDBH4w== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,236,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="534466127" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Apr 2021 04:55:37 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lYoyb-005jR3-Rr; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:55:33 +0300 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:55:33 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Bingbu Cao , Bingbu Cao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, rajatja@google.com, grundler@chromium.org, tfiga@chromium.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] iommu/vt-d: Use passthrough mode for the Intel IPUs Message-ID: References: <1618886913-6594-1-git-send-email-bingbu.cao@intel.com> <20210420105640.GI3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210420105640.GI3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:56:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:34:26PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote: > > On 4/20/21 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:48:33AM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote: ... > > > This misses the changelog from v1 followed by the explanation why resent. > > > > > I noticed there was a typo in the recipient list: > > stable.vger.kernel.org -> stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > no code change for resent. > > When you're submitting a patch and want it reach the stable kernels, you'll > need to add a Cc tag: > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > But not actually add the address to cc. I dropped stable@vger address from > distribution. Does it really matter? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko