From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94A0C433ED for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44C9613CE for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232174AbhDTOzg (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:55:36 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:46695 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231682AbhDTOzg (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:55:36 -0400 IronPort-SDR: OEE3+NQVTPibBb97Q1t/voWMLsAOWQKGKmgKzQltFYchc8QVg5Idhss+w9kCNBwkyHPU977dER AI9ldFCtmQrw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9960"; a="193396666" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,237,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="193396666" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Apr 2021 07:55:04 -0700 IronPort-SDR: dM4sAtHmAvUU0E/HzIJpF1Mxak3MPMiOy+ImXYzhL5aHCBDkR23wTvaoNfscCd0JbCnAbyS9RB 3YHvWIhpSSbg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,237,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="534523129" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Apr 2021 07:55:00 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lYrmD-005mvJ-7F; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:54:57 +0300 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:54:57 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Bingbu Cao , Bingbu Cao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, rajatja@google.com, grundler@chromium.org, tfiga@chromium.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] iommu/vt-d: Use passthrough mode for the Intel IPUs Message-ID: References: <1618886913-6594-1-git-send-email-bingbu.cao@intel.com> <20210420105640.GI3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> <20210420143727.GP3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210420143727.GP3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:37:27PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:55:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:56:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:34:26PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote: > > > > On 4/20/21 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:48:33AM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > This misses the changelog from v1 followed by the explanation why resent. > > > > > > > > > I noticed there was a typo in the recipient list: > > > > stable.vger.kernel.org -> stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > no code change for resent. > > > > > > When you're submitting a patch and want it reach the stable kernels, you'll > > > need to add a Cc tag: > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > But not actually add the address to cc. I dropped stable@vger address from > > > distribution. > > > > Does it really matter? > > Usually aligning what you're doing with > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst is not a bad idea. True, my point is that technically both ways will give the same result, no? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko