From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B776C433F5 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 23:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F0E61268 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 23:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233647AbhKKXxq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:53:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]:39781 "EHLO mail-pl1-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233255AbhKKXxq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:53:46 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id t21so7017018plr.6; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 15:50:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qS0CZVkEvy8NrjwRDarW2YyyqB6q3ZZReQXlxj9DPj0=; b=sQCEQHtYjKjNsupEof8Bd0IPeTFyXvq4adX8upmMT/yP73PjteCsjP6xnd4jALQ0AN b5uEi3+7CU90gic1fhIrYiU2l/NkndcpUKTOeRWVSpeMRQPqWB1JFHbWu3FvUrEmZn8f 3b0o8y/yx37R7V55qdeXxKpjuzs9mKEdnq0fK46BLBAhSrP4UXDv/xIn0sVZeyb8UxA9 O0AbRiMP3QA2YQslPY4y4kMBlu39VPWatszwO++dwZsh0iJjB3WGCBO8Pv267RkYi4uF cB0Sb8V198wSdCeRnOOJGLiZZGE+0SJ4lVtlImtXHS4HSutE8UlrMCH4+uk5hOFMM1US dLUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lpJJcXReqEl7OaDPOVm5KpdVsJWKbAn2RCUrr8hVpVJpyQ24r hXwGd5Ronp3W1x0ymlnXYZM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxD7vgHOm+CqjTu4Cb7VMMXgmwd7ogt0bcdV5HCmtkwKSO7JKxyoZuGP9UEOQQUth3qc0HZ5w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ad47:: with SMTP id w7mr31239452pjv.16.1636674656522; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 15:50:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocinante ([95.155.85.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19sm4266356pfl.169.2021.11.11.15.50.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 15:50:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:50:44 +0100 From: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= To: Jim Quinlan Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Rob Herring , Mark Brown , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Sean V Kelley , Jonathan Cameron , Qiuxu Zhuo , Keith Busch , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] PCI/portdrv: Create pcie_is_port_dev() func from existing code Message-ID: References: <20211110221456.11977-1-jim2101024@gmail.com> <20211110221456.11977-5-jim2101024@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211110221456.11977-5-jim2101024@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi Jim, [...] > +bool pcie_is_port_dev(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + int type; > + > + if (!dev) > + return false; > + > + type = pci_pcie_type(dev); > + > + return pci_is_pcie(dev) && > + ((type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) || > + (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) || > + (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) || > + (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcie_is_port_dev); It would be really nice to document what the above function does (not that some of the logic has been extracted from other function). You know, for the future generations of kernel hackers. Krzysztof