From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51524C433F5 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 22:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9A96139E for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 22:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236608AbhKGWgL (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:36:11 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f54.google.com ([209.85.167.54]:43990 "EHLO mail-lf1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234833AbhKGWgL (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:36:11 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f54.google.com with SMTP id b40so2621521lfv.10; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 14:33:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TcOnjusgh26WRRygIELm5rEJNqqciEbrMWW+wpZH2YQ=; b=dQDaExH3wGpqpzJXcS5mYcFKs4VQg2eLLP/8abaF453BGupWqLpFdxoSMFt3hRZGUo 762Ohom0u/AnJAHllyAJOX0WTtnuimBo+0IwV2KVDUA2HNiWs87ll1JNXcTZdcB3m00t dioY3eKQS42IgyVfAq2SgEySKsuLBK2/GuN1yCkF0dlXh6/QpEJxz4hh+jMxMdLSEZf/ 2H//G1LigOtkgCpeGpwVAlZ6JJ3vlzGCyzjRAVn0K7E/LDE/SWr+cHWvoA1DDmK5oLVU IQ8PO6EDP9G1WHDENcYO0xEq5qMyG7zx1DvayMoqc2HdZqDdyS+BFqYHY/ovLzc8X2v8 qsyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qceJFbnR3BJS0v7RCXK4y5hjnu+JAGTGNkufmJ0947im1mNgE qFyhJjDhsZaTy2zRuXTzVNs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlmG70iXy2dF/h7jB9af/pURZnvY8IWZIv2ofdCRAf7IDnnQyVMQgndAvyD4RskBg7yGP+Qw== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5d4a:: with SMTP id w10mr68127082lfd.584.1636324406811; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 14:33:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocinante ([95.155.85.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w15sm49383lfe.245.2021.11.07.14.33.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Nov 2021 14:33:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 23:33:24 +0100 From: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= To: Randy Dunlap Cc: marek.vasut@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Helgaas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Stephen Boyd , Wolfram Sang , Yoshihiro Shimoda , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: rcar: Check if device is runtime suspended instead of __clk_is_enabled() Message-ID: References: <20211107191057.145467-1-marek.vasut@gmail.com> <5c7d3591-4f9e-1598-8bfc-179c5049c379@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c7d3591-4f9e-1598-8bfc-179c5049c379@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi Randy, [...] > > Randy sent a patch which aims to fix the same issue, albeit in a slightly > > different way. I wonder if it would make sense for the two of you to look > > at which approach should we pick, or even whether we should combine the > > two into one patch? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20211107013703.19995-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/ > > Hi, > I saw Marek's patch a couple of hours ago. > > As long as pm_runtime_suspended() is always available, > either live or as a stub (and it looks like it is), > I don't see any reason for my patch at all. Understood! I marked it accordingly in Patchwok. Thank you both! By the way, can I count on your Acked-by or Reviewed-by here for Marek? If you agree with the premise of the changes here, etc., of course. Krzysztof