Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] PCI: designware-ep: Fix DBI access before core init

[Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>]

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:41:51PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:10:13PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > The drivers for platforms requiring reference clock from the PCIe host for
> > initializing their PCIe EP core, make use of the 'core_init_notifier'
> > feature exposed by the DWC common code. On these platforms, access to the
> > hw registers like DBI before completing the core initialization will result
> > in a whole system hang. But the current DWC EP driver tries to access DBI
> > registers during dw_pcie_ep_init() without waiting for core initialization
> > and it results in system hang on platforms making use of
> > 'core_init_notifier' such as Tegra194 and Qcom SM8450.
> > 
> > To workaround this issue, users of the above mentioned platforms have to
> > maintain the dependency with the PCIe host by booting the PCIe EP after
> > host boot. But this won't provide a good user experience, since PCIe EP is
> > _one_ of the features of those platforms and it doesn't make sense to
> > delay the whole platform booting due to the PCIe dependency.
> > 
> > So to fix this issue, let's move all the DBI access during
> > dw_pcie_ep_init() in the DWC EP driver to the dw_pcie_ep_init_complete()
> > API that gets called only after core initialization on these platforms.
> > This makes sure that the DBI register accesses are skipped during
> > dw_pcie_ep_init() and accessed later once the core initialization happens.
> > 
> > For the rest of the platforms, DBI access happens as usual.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> 
> Hello Mani,
> 
> I tried this patch on top of a work in progress EP driver,
> which, similar to pcie-qcom-ep.c has a perst gpio as input,
> and a .core_init_notifier.
> 
> What I noticed is the following every time I reboot the RC, I get:
> 
> [  604.735115] debugfs: Directory 'a40000000.pcie_ep' with parent 'dmaengine' already present!
> [ 1000.713582] debugfs: Directory 'a40000000.pcie_ep' with parent 'dmaengine' already present!
> [ 1000.714355] debugfs: File 'mf' in directory '/' already present!
> [ 1000.714890] debugfs: File 'wr_ch_cnt' in directory '/' already present!
> [ 1000.715476] debugfs: File 'rd_ch_cnt' in directory '/' already present!
> [ 1000.716061] debugfs: Directory 'registers' with parent '/' already present!
> 
> 
> Also:
> 
> # ls -al /sys/class/dma/dma*/device | grep pcie
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma3chan0/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma3chan1/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma3chan2/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma3chan3/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma4chan0/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma4chan1/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma4chan2/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:14 /sys/class/dma/dma4chan3/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:16 /sys/class/dma/dma5chan0/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:16 /sys/class/dma/dma5chan1/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:16 /sys/class/dma/dma5chan2/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root             0 Jan  1 00:16 /sys/class/dma/dma5chan3/device -> ../../../a40000000.pcie_ep
> 
> Adds another dmaX entry for each reboot.
> 
> 
> I'm quite sure that you will see the same with pcie-qcom-ep.
> 
> I think that either the DWC drivers using core_init (only tegra and qcom)
> need to deinit the eDMA in their assert_perst() function, or this patch
> needs to deinit the eDMA before initializing it.
> 
> 
> A problem with the current code, if you do NOT have this patch, which I assume
> is also problem on pcie-qcom-ep, is that since assert_perst() function performs
> a core reset, all the eDMA setting written in the dbi by the eDMA driver will be
> cleared, so a PERST assert + deassert by the RC will wipe the eDMA settings.
> Hopefully, this will no longer be a problem after this patch has been merged.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

I'm sorry that I'm just looking at this patch now (it's v7 already).
But I did notice that the DWC code is inconsistent for drivers having
a .core_init_notifier and drivers not having a .core_init_notifier.

When receiving a hot reset or link-down reset, the DWC core gets reset,
which means that most DBI settings get reset to their reset value.


Both tegra and qcom-ep does have a start_link() that is basically a no-op.
Instead, ep_init_complete() (and LTSSM enable) is called when PERST is
deasserted, so settings written by ep_init_complete() will always get set
after PERST is asserted + deasserted.

However, for a driver without a .core_init_notifier, a pci-epf-test unbind
+ bind, will currently NOT write the DBI settings written by
ep_init_complete() when starting the link the second time.

If you unbind + bind pci-epf-test (which requires stopping and starting the
link), I think that you should write all the DBI settings. Unbinding + binding
will allocate memory for all the BARs, write all the iATU settings etc.
It doesn't make sense that some DBI writes (those made by ep_init_complete())
are not redone.

The problem is that if you do not have a .core_init_notifier,
ep_init_complete() (which does DBI writes) is only called by ep_init(),
and never ever again.


Considering that .start_link() is a no-op for DWC drivers with a
.core_init_notifier (they instead call ep_init_complete() when perst is
deasserted), I think the most logical thing would be for .start_link() to
call ep_init_complete() (for drivers without a .core_init_notifier), that way,
all DBI settings (and not just some) will be written on an unbind + bind.


Something like this:

--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -465,6 +465,16 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_start(struct pci_epc *epc)
 {
        struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
        struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+       const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
+
+       if (ep->ops->get_features) {
+               epc_features = ep->ops->get_features(ep);
+               if (!epc_features->core_init_notifier) {
+                       ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(ep);
+                       if (ret)
+                               return ret;
+               }
+       }
 
        return dw_pcie_start_link(pci);
 }
@@ -729,7 +739,6 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
        struct device *dev = pci->dev;
        struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
        struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
-       const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
        struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->func_list);
@@ -817,16 +826,6 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
        if (ret)
                goto err_free_epc_mem;
 
-       if (ep->ops->get_features) {
-               epc_features = ep->ops->get_features(ep);
-               if (epc_features->core_init_notifier)
-                       return 0;
-       }
-
-       ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(ep);
-       if (ret)
-               goto err_remove_edma;
-
        return 0;
 
 err_remove_edma:


I could send a patch, but it would be conflicting with your patch.
And you also need to handle deiniting + initing the eDMA in a nice way,
but that seems to be a problem that also needs to be addressed with the
patch in $subject.

What do you think?


Kind regards,
Niklas