linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: imx: Simplify switch-case logic by involve core_reset callback
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:38:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zi/M/rdiGGF6TGYj@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240427101950.GL1981@thinkpad>

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 03:49:50PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:33:43AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > Instead of using the switch case statement to assert/dassert the core reset
> > handled by this driver itself, let's introduce a new callback core_reset()
> > and define it for platforms that require it. This simplifies the code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c
> > index 77dae5c3f7057..af0f960f28757 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-imx.c
> > @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct imx_pcie_drvdata {
> >  	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
> >  	int (*init_phy)(struct imx_pcie *pcie);
> >  	int (*set_ref_clk)(struct imx_pcie *pcie, bool enable);
> > +	int (*core_reset)(struct imx_pcie *pcie, bool assert);
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct imx_pcie {
> > @@ -671,35 +672,72 @@ static void imx_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
> >  	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt, imx_pcie->clks);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int imx6sx_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> > +{
> > +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12, IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN,
> > +			   assert ? IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN : 0);
> 
> Earlier, this register was not cleared during deassert. Is if fine?

Just missed power off cycle, it is functional. But I think it's better
to match old logic to let review easily. 

> 
> > +	/* Force PCIe PHY reset */
> > +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR5, IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET,
> > +			   assert ? IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET : 0);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int imx6qp_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> > +{
> > +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST,
> > +			   assert ? IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST : 0);
> > +	if (!assert)
> > +		usleep_range(200, 500);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int imx6q_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> > +{
> > +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD,
> > +			   assert ? IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD : 0);
> > +
> > +	regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN,
> > +			   assert ? 0 : IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN);
> > +
> 
> Same comment as above.
> 
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int imx7d_pcie_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool assert)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx_pcie->pci;
> > +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > +
> > +	if (assert)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Workaround for ERR010728, failure of PCI-e PLL VCO to oscillate, especially when cold.
> 
> What does 'especially when cold' means? I know it is an old comment, but still
> it is not very clear.
> 
> > +	 * This turns off "Duty-cycle Corrector" and other mysterious undocumented things.
> 
> Same comment as previous patch.

It is copy from old comments. How about keep the same here. And improve at
difference patch? I copied key content from formal errata.

/*
Workaround for ERR010728 (IMX7DS_2N09P, Rev. 1.1, 4/2023): 

PCIe: PLL may fail to lock under corner conditions

Initial VCO oscillation may fail under corner conditions such as cold
temperature which will cause the PCIe PLL fail to lock in the
initialization phase.

The Duty-cycle Corrector calibration must be disabled

1. De-assert the G_RST signal by clearing SRC_PCIEPHY_RCR[PCIEPHY_G_RST].
2. De-assert DCC_FB_EN by writing data “0x29” to the register address 0x306d0014. 
3. Assert RX_EQS, RX_EQ_SEL by writing data “0x48” to the register address 0x306d0090. 
4. Assert ATT_MODE by writing data “0xbc” to the register address 0x306d0098. 
5. De-assert the CMN_RST signal by clearing register bit SRC_PCIEPHY_RCR[PCIEPHY_BTN]

*/

> 
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	if (likely(imx_pcie->phy_base)) {
> > +		/* De-assert DCC_FB_EN */
> > +		writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4_DCC_FB_EN, imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4);
> > +		/* Assert RX_EQS and RX_EQS_SEL */
> > +		writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ_SEL | PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ,
> > +		       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24);
> > +		/* Assert ATT_MODE */
> > +		writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26_ATT_MODE, imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26);
> 
> Why does this workaround a part of core_reset handling? This function doesn't
> look like performing reset at all.

According to errata document, it should be step 2,3,4.

> 
> - Mani
> 
> > +	} else {
> > +		dev_warn(dev, "Unable to apply ERR010728 workaround. DT missing fsl,imx7d-pcie-phy phandle ?\n");
> > +	}
> > +	imx7d_pcie_wait_for_phy_pll_lock(imx_pcie);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void imx_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
> >  {
> >  	reset_control_assert(imx_pcie->pciephy_reset);
> >  	reset_control_assert(imx_pcie->apps_reset);
> >  
> > -	switch (imx_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > -	case IMX6SX:
> > -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> > -				   IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN,
> > -				   IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN);
> > -		/* Force PCIe PHY reset */
> > -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR5,
> > -				   IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET,
> > -				   IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET);
> > -		break;
> > -	case IMX6QP:
> > -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> > -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST,
> > -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST);
> > -		break;
> > -	case IMX6Q:
> > -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> > -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD, 1 << 18);
> > -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> > -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN, 0 << 16);
> > -		break;
> > -	default:
> > -		break;
> > -	}
> > +	if (imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset)
> > +		imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset(imx_pcie, true);
> >  
> >  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
> >  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx_pcie->reset_gpio))
> > @@ -709,47 +747,10 @@ static void imx_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
> >  
> >  static int imx_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
> >  {
> > -	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx_pcie->pci;
> > -	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > -
> >  	reset_control_deassert(imx_pcie->pciephy_reset);
> >  
> > -	switch (imx_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > -	case IMX7D:
> > -		/* Workaround for ERR010728, failure of PCI-e PLL VCO to
> > -		 * oscillate, especially when cold.  This turns off "Duty-cycle
> > -		 * Corrector" and other mysterious undocumented things.
> > -		 */
> > -		if (likely(imx_pcie->phy_base)) {
> > -			/* De-assert DCC_FB_EN */
> > -			writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4_DCC_FB_EN,
> > -			       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG4);
> > -			/* Assert RX_EQS and RX_EQS_SEL */
> > -			writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ_SEL
> > -				| PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24_RX_EQ,
> > -			       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG24);
> > -			/* Assert ATT_MODE */
> > -			writel(PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26_ATT_MODE,
> > -			       imx_pcie->phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG26);
> > -		} else {
> > -			dev_warn(dev, "Unable to apply ERR010728 workaround. DT missing fsl,imx7d-pcie-phy phandle ?\n");
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		imx7d_pcie_wait_for_phy_pll_lock(imx_pcie);
> > -		break;
> > -	case IMX6SX:
> > -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR5,
> > -				   IMX6SX_GPR5_PCIE_BTNRST_RESET, 0);
> > -		break;
> > -	case IMX6QP:
> > -		regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> > -				   IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_SW_RST, 0);
> > -
> > -		usleep_range(200, 500);
> > -		break;
> > -	default:
> > -		break;
> > -	}
> > +	if (imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset)
> > +		imx_pcie->drvdata->core_reset(imx_pcie, false);
> >  
> >  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
> >  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx_pcie->reset_gpio)) {
> > @@ -1447,6 +1448,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
> >  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
> >  		.init_phy = imx_pcie_init_phy,
> >  		.set_ref_clk = imx6q_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> > +		.core_reset = imx6q_pcie_core_reset,
> >  	},
> >  	[IMX6SX] = {
> >  		.variant = IMX6SX,
> > @@ -1462,6 +1464,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
> >  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
> >  		.init_phy = imx6sx_pcie_init_phy,
> >  		.set_ref_clk = imx6sx_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> > +		.core_reset = imx6sx_pcie_core_reset,
> >  	},
> >  	[IMX6QP] = {
> >  		.variant = IMX6QP,
> > @@ -1478,6 +1481,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
> >  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
> >  		.init_phy = imx_pcie_init_phy,
> >  		.set_ref_clk = imx6q_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> > +		.core_reset = imx6qp_pcie_core_reset,
> >  	},
> >  	[IMX7D] = {
> >  		.variant = IMX7D,
> > @@ -1491,6 +1495,7 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
> >  		.mode_mask[0] = IMX6Q_GPR12_DEVICE_TYPE,
> >  		.init_phy = imx7d_pcie_init_phy,
> >  		.set_ref_clk = imx7d_pcie_set_ref_clk,
> > +		.core_reset = imx7d_pcie_core_reset,
> >  	},
> >  	[IMX8MQ] = {
> >  		.variant = IMX8MQ,
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02 14:33 [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95 Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] PCI: imx6: Fix PCIe link down when i.MX8MM and i.MX8MP PCIe is EP mode Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:00   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 14:53     ` Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] PCI: imx6: Fix i.MX8MP PCIe EP can not trigger MSI Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:23   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 15:58     ` Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] PCI: imx6: Rename imx6_* with imx_* Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:29   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] PCI: imx6: Rename pci-imx6.c to pcie-imx.c Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:31   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 16:01     ` Frank Li
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] MAINTAINERS: pci: imx: update imx6* to imx* since rename driver file Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:33   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 15:03   ` Rob Herring
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] PCI: imx: Simplify switch-case logic by involve set_ref_clk callback Frank Li
2024-04-27  9:54   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: imx: Simplify switch-case logic by involve core_reset callback Frank Li
2024-04-27 10:19   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 16:38     ` Frank Li [this message]
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] PCI: imx: Config look up table(LUT) to support MSI ITS and IOMMU for i.MX95 Frank Li
2024-04-27 11:36   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 15:06     ` Rob Herring
2024-04-29 17:00     ` Frank Li
2024-04-29 15:08   ` Rob Herring
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: imx: Consolidate redundant if-checks Frank Li
2024-04-27 11:38   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add i.MX8Q pcie compatible string Frank Li
2024-04-29 15:48   ` Rob Herring
2024-04-29 21:23     ` Frank Li
2024-05-07 14:55       ` Rob Herring
2024-04-02 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] PCI: imx6: Add i.MX8Q PCIe support Frank Li
2024-04-27 11:47   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-29 17:56     ` Frank Li
2024-04-16 14:07 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95 Frank Li
2024-04-25 11:12   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-23 14:23 ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zi/M/rdiGGF6TGYj@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).