linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"  <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, keith.busch@intel.com,
	knsathya@kernel.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] PCI: pciehp: Skip DLLSC handling if DPC is triggered
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:11:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a137e4aa-22fb-5683-7d58-847408c6bf2b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210312213302.GA2291310@bjorn-Precision-5520>



On 3/12/21 1:33 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Lukas, pciehp expert]
> 
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:34:10PM -0800, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> When hotplug and DPC are both enabled on a Root port or
>> Downstream Port, during DPC events that cause a DLLSC link
>> down/up events, such events must be suppressed to let the DPC
>> driver own the recovery path.
> 
> I first thought you were saying "during DPC events, DPC events must be
> suppressed" which would be nonsensical.  But I guess this is saying
> the "*link down/up* events must be suppressed"?
Correct. Our intention is to suppress DLLSC event during the DPC event.
> 
>> When DPC is present and enabled, hardware will put the port in
>> containment state to allow SW to recover from the error condition
>> in the seamless manner. But, during the DPC error recovery process,
>> since the link is in disabled state, it will also raise the DLLSC
>> event. In Linux kernel architecture, DPC events are handled by DPC
>> driver and DLLSC events are handled by hotplug driver. If a hotplug
>> driver is allowed to handle such DLLSC event (triggered by DPC
>> containment), then we will have a race condition between error
>> recovery handler (in DPC driver) and hotplug handler in recovering
>> the contained port. Allowing such a race leads to a lot of stability
>> issues while recovering the  device. So skip DLLSC handling in the
>> hotplug driver when the PCIe port associated with the hotplug event is
>> in DPC triggered state and let the DPC driver be responsible for the
>> port recovery.
>>
>> Following is the sample dmesg log which shows the contention
>> between hotplug handler and error recovery handler. In this
>> case, hotplug handler won the race and error recovery
>> handler reported failure.
>>
>> [  724.974237] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: pciehp: Slot(4): Link Down
>> [  724.974266] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: DPC: containment event, status:0x1f01 source:0x0000
>> [  724.974269] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: DPC: unmasked uncorrectable error detected
>> [  724.974275] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID)
>> [  724.974283] pcieport 0000:97:02.0:   device [8086:347a] error status/mask=00004000/00100020
>> [  724.974288] pcieport 0000:97:02.0:    [14] CmpltTO                (First)
>> [  724.999181] pci 0000:98:00.0: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback)
>> [  724.999227] pci 0000:98:00.0: Removing from iommu group 181
>> [  726.063125] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: pciehp: Slot(4): Card present
>> [  726.221117] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: DPC: Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec
>> [  726.221122] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: AER: subordinate device reset failed
>> [  726.221162] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: AER: device recovery failed
>> [  727.227176] pci 0000:98:00.0: [8086:0953] type 00 class 0x010802
>> [  727.227202] pci 0000:98:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
>> [  727.227234] pci 0000:98:00.0: reg 0x30: [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref]
>> [  727.227246] pci 0000:98:00.0: Max Payload Size set to 256 (was 128, max 256)
>> [  727.227251] pci 0000:98:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
>> [  727.227736] pci 0000:98:00.0: Adding to iommu group 181
>> [  727.231150] pci 0000:98:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xd1000000-0xd100ffff pref]
>> [  727.231156] pci 0000:98:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xd1010000-0xd1013fff 64bit]
>> [  727.231170] pcieport 0000:97:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 98]
>> [  727.231174] pcieport 0000:97:02.0:   bridge window [io  0xc000-0xcfff]
>> [  727.231181] pcieport 0000:97:02.0:   bridge window [mem 0xd1000000-0xd10fffff]
>> [  727.231186] pcieport 0000:97:02.0:   bridge window [mem 0x206000000000-0x2060001fffff 64bit pref]
>> [  727.231555] nvme nvme1: pci function 0000:98:00.0
>> [  727.231581] nvme 0000:98:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
>> [  737.141132] nvme nvme1: 31/0/0 default/read/poll queues
>> [  737.146211]  nvme1n2: p1
> 
> Quite a bit of the above really isn't relevant to the problem, so
> stripping it out would reduce distraction.  E.g.,
> 
>    Removing from iommu group
>    reg ...
>    Max Payload Size set
>    enabling Extended Tags
>    Adding to iommu group
>    BAR X: assigned ...
>    PCI bridge to [bus 98]
>    bridge window ...
> 
> Probably the timestamps are also only of incidental interest and could
> be removed?
Agree. will fix this in next version.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/pci/pci.h                |  2 ++
>>   drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c           | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   include/linux/pci.h              |  1 +
>>   4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> index fb3840e222ad..8e7916abc60e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> @@ -691,6 +691,24 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_ist(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>   		goto out;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If the DLLSC link up/down event is generated due to DPC containment
>> +	 * in the PCIe port, skip the DLLSC event handling and let the DPC driver
>> +	 * own the port recovery. Allowing both hotplug DLLSC event handler and DPC
>> +	 * event trigger handler attempt recovery on the same port leads to stability
>> +	 * issues. if DPC recovery is successful, is_dpc_reset_active() will return
>> +	 * false and the hotplug handler will not suppress the DLLSC event. If DPC
>> +	 * recovery fails and the link is left in disabled state, once the user
>> +	 * changes the faulty card, the hotplug handler can still handle the PRESENCE
>> +	 * change event and bring the device back up.
> 
> Please wrap the above so it fits in 80 columns.
> 
> s/trigger handler attempt recovery/trigger handler to attempt recovery/
> s/issues. if/issues. If/
will fix it in next version.
> 
>> +	 */
>> +	if ((events == PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC) && is_dpc_reset_active(pdev)) {
>> +		ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot(%s): DLLSC event(DPC), skipped\n",
>> +			  slot_name(ctrl));
>> +		ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	/* Check Attention Button Pressed */
>>   	if (events & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_ABP) {
>>   		ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot(%s): Attention button pressed\n",
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> index ef7c4661314f..cee7095483bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> @@ -446,10 +446,12 @@ void pci_restore_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>   void pci_dpc_init(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>>   void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>>   pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> +bool is_dpc_reset_active(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>>   #else
>>   static inline void pci_save_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
>>   static inline void pci_restore_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
>>   static inline void pci_dpc_init(struct pci_dev *pdev) {}
>> +static inline bool is_dpc_reset_active(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return false; }
>>   #endif
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
>> index e05aba86a317..ad51109921af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
>> @@ -71,6 +71,30 @@ void pci_restore_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>   	pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_CTL, *cap);
>>   }
>>   
>> +bool is_dpc_reset_active(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
>> +	u16 status;
>> +
>> +	if (!dev->dpc_cap)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If DPC is owned by firmware and EDR is not supported, there is
>> +	 * no race between hotplug and DPC recovery handler. So return
>> +	 * false.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!host->native_dpc && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	if (atomic_read_acquire(&dev->dpc_reset_active))
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
>> +
>> +	return !!(status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER);
> 
> I know it's somewhat common in drivers/pci/, but I'm not really a
> big fan of "!!".
I can change it to use ternary operator.
(status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER) ? true : false;
> 
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int dpc_wait_rp_inactive(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ;
>> @@ -91,6 +115,7 @@ static int dpc_wait_rp_inactive(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   
>>   pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   {
>> +	pci_ers_result_t status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>>   	u16 cap;
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -109,15 +134,19 @@ pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   	if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions && dpc_wait_rp_inactive(pdev))
>>   		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>   
>> +	atomic_inc_return_acquire(&pdev->dpc_reset_active);
>> +
>>   	pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS,
>>   			      PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER);
>>   
>>   	if (!pcie_wait_for_link(pdev, true)) {
>>   		pci_info(pdev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec\n");
>> -		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>> +		status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>> +	atomic_dec_return_release(&pdev->dpc_reset_active);
>> +
>> +	return status;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void dpc_process_rp_pio_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 86c799c97b77..3314f616520d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
>>   	u16		dpc_cap;
>>   	unsigned int	dpc_rp_extensions:1;
>>   	u8		dpc_rp_log_size;
>> +	atomic_t	dpc_reset_active;	/* DPC trigger is active */
>>   #endif
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_ATS
>>   	union {
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-12 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-09  6:34 [PATCH v1 1/1] PCI: pciehp: Skip DLLSC handling if DPC is triggered sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2021-03-12 21:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-03-12 22:11   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2021-03-12 23:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-03-12 23:26       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-03-13  0:37       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a137e4aa-22fb-5683-7d58-847408c6bf2b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=knsathya@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).