From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Raju Rangoju <rajur@chelsio.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] cxgb4: Search VPD with pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword()
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:06:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <affa0bd6-b67b-6065-34e3-98f1420f121c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210824171142.GA3478603@bjorn-Precision-5520>
On 24.08.2021 19:11, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 03:59:21PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Use pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() to search for keywords in VPD to
>> simplify the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c | 67 +++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c
>> index 2aeb2f80f..5e8ac42ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c
>> @@ -2743,10 +2743,9 @@ int t4_seeprom_wp(struct adapter *adapter, bool enable)
>> */
>> int t4_get_raw_vpd_params(struct adapter *adapter, struct vpd_params *p)
>> {
>> - int i, ret = 0, addr;
>> - int sn, pn, na;
>> + unsigned int id_len, pn_len, sn_len, na_len;
>> + int sn, pn, na, addr, ret = 0;
>> u8 *vpd, base_val = 0;
>> - unsigned int vpdr_len, kw_offset, id_len;
>>
>> vpd = vmalloc(VPD_LEN);
>> if (!vpd)
>> @@ -2772,60 +2771,48 @@ int t4_get_raw_vpd_params(struct adapter *adapter, struct vpd_params *p)
>> }
>>
>> id_len = pci_vpd_lrdt_size(vpd);
>> - if (id_len > ID_LEN)
>> - id_len = ID_LEN;
>>
>> - i = pci_vpd_find_tag(vpd, VPD_LEN, PCI_VPD_LRDT_RO_DATA);
>> - if (i < 0) {
>> - dev_err(adapter->pdev_dev, "missing VPD-R section\n");
>> + ret = pci_vpd_check_csum(vpd, VPD_LEN);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(adapter->pdev_dev, "VPD checksum incorrect or missing\n");
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - vpdr_len = pci_vpd_lrdt_size(&vpd[i]);
>> - kw_offset = i + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE;
>> - if (vpdr_len + kw_offset > VPD_LEN) {
>> - dev_err(adapter->pdev_dev, "bad VPD-R length %u\n", vpdr_len);
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> + ret = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd, VPD_LEN,
>> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_SERIALNO, &sn_len);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> goto out;
>> - }
>> + sn = ret;
>>
>> -#define FIND_VPD_KW(var, name) do { \
>> - var = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd, kw_offset, vpdr_len, name); \
>> - if (var < 0) { \
>> - dev_err(adapter->pdev_dev, "missing VPD keyword " name "\n"); \
>
> Just for the record, I guess this patch gives up these error messages
> that mention the specific keyword that's missing? Not really an issue
> for *me*, since the people generating the VPD content should be able to
> easily validate this and figure out any errors. Just pointing it out
> in case the cxgb4 folks are attached to the messages.
>
Right. My thought was: With userspace tools like "lspci -vv" or
"od <path>/vpd" it's easy to check the actual content of VPD and find
out which keyword is missing. Therefore the missing keyword doesn't
necessarily has to be referenced in an error message.
>> - ret = -EINVAL; \
>> - goto out; \
>> - } \
>> - var += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; \
>> -} while (0)
>> -
>> - ret = pci_vpd_check_csum(vpd, VPD_LEN);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(adapter->pdev_dev, "VPD checksum incorrect or missing\n");
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> + ret = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd, VPD_LEN,
>> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_PARTNO, &pn_len);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> goto out;
>> - }
>> + pn = ret;
>>
>> - FIND_VPD_KW(sn, "SN");
>> - FIND_VPD_KW(pn, "PN");
>> - FIND_VPD_KW(na, "NA");
>> -#undef FIND_VPD_KW
>> + ret = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd, VPD_LEN, "NA", &na_len);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out;
>> + na = ret;
>>
>> - memcpy(p->id, vpd + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE, id_len);
>> + memcpy(p->id, vpd + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE, min_t(int, id_len, ID_LEN));
>> strim(p->id);
>> - i = pci_vpd_info_field_size(vpd + sn - PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE);
>> - memcpy(p->sn, vpd + sn, min(i, SERNUM_LEN));
>> + memcpy(p->sn, vpd + sn, min_t(int, sn_len, SERNUM_LEN));
>> strim(p->sn);
>> - i = pci_vpd_info_field_size(vpd + pn - PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE);
>> - memcpy(p->pn, vpd + pn, min(i, PN_LEN));
>> + memcpy(p->pn, vpd + pn, min_t(int, pn_len, PN_LEN));
>> strim(p->pn);
>> - memcpy(p->na, vpd + na, min(i, MACADDR_LEN));
>> + memcpy(p->na, vpd + na, min_t(int, na_len, MACADDR_LEN));
>> strim((char *)p->na);
>>
>> out:
>> vfree(vpd);
>> - return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(adapter->pdev_dev, "error reading VPD\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-22 13:46 [PATCH 00/12] PCI/VPD: Convert more users to the new VPD API functions Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 13:48 ` [PATCH 01/12] sfc: falcon: Read VPD with pci_vpd_alloc() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 16:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-22 13:49 ` [PATCH 02/12] sfc: falcon: Search VPD with pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH 03/12] bnx2: " Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 13:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] bnx2: Replace open-coded version with swab32s() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 13:53 ` [PATCH 05/12] bnx2x: Read VPD with pci_vpd_alloc() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 17:42 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-22 13:54 ` [PATCH 06/12] bnx2x: Search VPD with pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-24 17:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-24 18:01 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-24 18:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-22 13:55 ` [PATCH 07/12] bnxt: Read VPD with pci_vpd_alloc() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 18:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-22 13:56 ` [PATCH 08/12] bnxt: Search VPD with pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 13:57 ` [PATCH 09/12] cxgb4: Validate VPD checksum with pci_vpd_check_csum() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/12] cxgb4: Remove unused vpd_param member ec Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-22 13:59 ` [PATCH 11/12] cxgb4: Search VPD with pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-24 17:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-24 18:06 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2021-08-22 14:01 ` [PATCH 12/12] scsi: cxlflash: " Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-24 18:48 ` [PATCH 00/12] PCI/VPD: Convert more users to the new VPD API functions Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=affa0bd6-b67b-6065-34e3-98f1420f121c@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajur@chelsio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).