From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:08:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jiang Liu cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , Randy Dunlap , Yinghai Lu , Borislav Petkov , Grant Likely , x86@kernel.org, Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Prarit Bhargava , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andrew Morton , Tony Luck , Joerg Roedel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch v4 14/16] x86, irq: Introduce helper to check whether an IOAPIC has been registered In-Reply-To: <540FBB93.4020509@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1409192561-19744-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <1409192561-19744-15-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <540FBB93.4020509@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2014/9/9 20:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> + ret = mp_ioapic_registered(gsi_base); > >> + up_write(&acpi_ioapic_rwsem); > >> + > >> + return ret; > >> +} > > > > So I assume that this is for a particular caller in the apci ioapic > > hotplug code and that call site has its own serialization. Otherwise > > the return value is not protected at all. > > > > Please add a Docbook comment to that function, and document the > > locking rules as thats pretty non obvious. > How about this comments about locking rules? > /* > * Locks related to IOAPIC hotplug > * Hotplug side: > * ->lock_device_hotplug() //device_hotplug_lock > * ->acpi_ioapic_rwsem > * ->ioapic_lock > * Interrupt mapping side: > * ->acpi_ioapic_rwsem > * ->ioapic_mutex > * ->ioapic_lock > */ That looks asymetric. Why is the hotplug side not taking ioapic_mutex? Thanks, tglx