linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@openeuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: don't set bitmap for LPI which user didn't allocate
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:25:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfe5e98a-52a6-636b-6b61-45482c07e2ec@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508c6c07a2c599ae1fc8b726fda69b44@kernel.org>


On 2021/2/8 19:59, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2021-02-08 10:58, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
>> The driver sets the LPI bitmap of device based on 
>> get_count_order(nvecs).
>> This means that when the number of LPI interrupts does not meet the 
>> power
>> of two, redundant bits are set in the LPI bitmap. However, when free
>> interrupt, these redundant bits is not cleared. As a result, device will
>> fails to allocate the same numbers of interrupts next time.
>>
>> Therefore, clear the redundant bits set in LPI bitmap.
>>
>> Fixes: 4615fbc3788d ("genirq/irqdomain: Don't try to free an interrupt
>> that has no mapping")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c 
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> index ed46e60..027f7ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> @@ -3435,6 +3435,10 @@ static int its_alloc_device_irq(struct
>> its_device *dev, int nvecs, irq_hw_number
>>
>>      *hwirq = dev->event_map.lpi_base + idx;
>>
>> +    bitmap_clear(dev->event_map.lpi_map,
>> +             idx + nvecs,
>> +             roundup_pow_of_two(nvecs) - nvecs);
>> +
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>
> What makes you think that the remaining LPIs are free to be released?


I think that the LPI bitmap is used to mark the valid LPI interrupts 
allocated to the PCIe device.

Therefore, for the remaining LPIs, the ITS can reserve entries in the 
ITT table, but the bitmap does not need to be set.


Maybe my understanding is wrong, and I'm a little confused about the 
function of this bitmap.


> Even if the end-point has request a non-po2 number of MSIs, it could
> very well rely on the the rest of it to be available (specially in the
> case of PCI Multi-MSI).


yes, you are right. But for Multi-MSI, does it mean that one PCIE device 
can own several MSI interrupts?


Another question, is it possible for module driver to use these 
remaining LPIs?

For example, in my case


I allcoate 32 MSI with 16 affi-IRQ in it.

MSI can only offer 20 MSIs because online CPU number is 4 and it create 
20 msi desc then.

ITS create a its device for this PCIe device and generate a ITT tabel 
for 32 MSIs.


so in MSI, it provide 20 valid MSIs, but in ITS, lpi bitmap show that 32 
MSI is allocated.

This logic is a bit strange and a little incomprehensible.


>
> Have a look at the thread pointed out by John for a potential fix.


Sorry for missing that, I think it can fix my issue too, let me test it 
later.


Thanks

jiaxing


>
> Thanks,
>
>         M.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 10:58 [PATCH v1 0/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: don't set bitmap for LPI which user didn't allocate Luo Jiaxing
2021-02-08 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] " Luo Jiaxing
2021-02-08 11:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-09  7:25     ` luojiaxing [this message]
2021-02-08 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] genirq/msi: add an error print when __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() failed Luo Jiaxing
2021-02-08 11:14 ` [Linuxarm] [PATCH v1 0/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: don't set bitmap for LPI which user didn't allocate John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bfe5e98a-52a6-636b-6b61-45482c07e2ec@huawei.com \
    --to=luojiaxing@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).