[PATCH 0/3] Expose VMD BIOS domain info

[PATCH 0/3] Expose VMD BIOS domain info

[Jon Derrick]

In order to provide better VMD userspace management support, VMD needs to know
its instance number in the platform. VMDs can be enabled or disabled, so a
simple enumeration can't explicitly determine the instance number of the VMD.

To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS writes the VMD instance
number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO Base/Limit
registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this information and
expose it to userspace.

This set exposes hardware-specific details of the VMD configuration as written
by the VMD-enabled BIOS. This data is restored to the same location on reset or
module unload. This set reuses the serialized child device configuration
accessors for proper ordering and write flushing.

Jon Derrick (3):
  PCI: vmd: Add helpers to access device config space
  PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS
  PCI: vmd: Restore domain info during resets/unloads

 drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH 1/3] PCI: vmd: Add helpers to access device config space

[Jon Derrick]

This patch adds helpers to access child device config space. It uses the
fabric-view of the bus number, which requires the pci accessors to
translate out the starting bus number. This will allow internal code to
access child device config space without a struct pci_bus while minding
the accessing rules.

Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
index a35d3f3..959c7c7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
@@ -440,12 +440,10 @@ static void vmd_setup_dma_ops(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
 }
 #undef ASSIGN_VMD_DMA_OPS
 
-static char __iomem *vmd_cfg_addr(struct vmd_dev *vmd, struct pci_bus *bus,
+static char __iomem *vmd_cfg_addr(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned char busn,
 				  unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len)
 {
-	char __iomem *addr = vmd->cfgbar +
-			     ((bus->number - vmd->busn_start) << 20) +
-			     (devfn << 12) + reg;
+	char __iomem *addr = vmd->cfgbar + (busn << 20) + (devfn << 12) + reg;
 
 	if ((addr - vmd->cfgbar) + len >=
 	    resource_size(&vmd->dev->resource[VMD_CFGBAR]))
@@ -458,11 +456,10 @@ static char __iomem *vmd_cfg_addr(struct vmd_dev *vmd, struct pci_bus *bus,
  * CPU may deadlock if config space is not serialized on some versions of this
  * hardware, so all config space access is done under a spinlock.
  */
-static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
-			int len, u32 *value)
+static int vmd_cfg_read(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned char busn,
+			unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
 {
-	struct vmd_dev *vmd = vmd_from_bus(bus);
-	char __iomem *addr = vmd_cfg_addr(vmd, bus, devfn, reg, len);
+	char __iomem *addr = vmd_cfg_addr(vmd, busn, devfn, reg, len);
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -488,16 +485,23 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
+			int len, u32 *value)
+{
+	struct vmd_dev *vmd = vmd_from_bus(bus);
+	return vmd_cfg_read(vmd, bus->number - vmd->busn_start, devfn,
+			    reg, len, value);
+}
+
 /*
  * VMD h/w converts non-posted config writes to posted memory writes. The
  * read-back in this function forces the completion so it returns only after
  * the config space was written, as expected.
  */
-static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
-			 int len, u32 value)
+static int vmd_cfg_write(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned char busn,
+			 unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value)
 {
-	struct vmd_dev *vmd = vmd_from_bus(bus);
-	char __iomem *addr = vmd_cfg_addr(vmd, bus, devfn, reg, len);
+	char __iomem *addr = vmd_cfg_addr(vmd, busn, devfn, reg, len);
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -526,6 +530,14 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
+			 int len, u32 value)
+{
+	struct vmd_dev *vmd = vmd_from_bus(bus);
+	return vmd_cfg_write(vmd, bus->number - vmd->busn_start, devfn,
+			     reg, len, value);
+}
+
 static struct pci_ops vmd_ops = {
 	.read		= vmd_pci_read,
 	.write		= vmd_pci_write,
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Jon Derrick]

When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.

To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
information and expose it to userspace.

Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
index 959c7c7..dbe1bff 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct vmd_dev {
 	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
 	struct pci_bus		*bus;
 	u8			busn_start;
+	u8			socket_nr;
+	u8			instance_nr;
 
 	struct dma_map_ops	dma_ops;
 	struct dma_domain	dma_domain;
@@ -543,6 +545,74 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
 	.write		= vmd_pci_write,
 };
 
+/**
+ * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
+ * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
+ * @rp: int iterator cursor
+ * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
+ *
+ * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
+ * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
+ * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
+ * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
+ */
+#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
+	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
+		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
+				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
+		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else
+
+static int vmd_parse_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
+{
+	int root_port, ret;
+	u32 temp, iobase;
+
+	vmd->socket_nr = -1;
+	vmd->instance_nr = -1;
+
+	for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, root_port, temp) {
+		ret = vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),
+				   PCI_IO_BASE, 2, &iobase);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		vmd->socket_nr = (iobase >> 4) & 0xf;
+		vmd->instance_nr = (iobase >> 14) & 0x3;
+
+		/* First available will be used */
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t socket_nr_show(struct device *dev,
+			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->socket_nr);
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(socket_nr);
+
+static ssize_t instance_nr_show(struct device *dev,
+			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->instance_nr);
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(instance_nr);
+
+static struct attribute *vmd_dev_attrs[] = {
+	&dev_attr_socket_nr.attr,
+	&dev_attr_instance_nr.attr,
+	NULL
+};
+ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(vmd_dev);
+
 static void vmd_attach_resources(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
 {
 	vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR1].child = &vmd->resources[1];
@@ -582,6 +652,11 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
 	resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
 	resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000;
 	struct pci_bus *child;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = vmd_parse_domain(vmd);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * Shadow registers may exist in certain VMD device ids which allow
@@ -591,7 +666,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
 	 */
 	if (features & VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW) {
 		u32 vmlock;
-		int ret;
 
 		membar2_offset = MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET + MB2_SHADOW_SIZE;
 		ret = pci_read_config_dword(vmd->dev, PCI_REG_VMLOCK, &vmlock);
@@ -876,7 +950,8 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
 	.probe		= vmd_probe,
 	.remove		= vmd_remove,
 	.driver		= {
-		.pm	= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
+		.pm		= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
+		.dev_groups	= vmd_dev_groups,
 	},
 };
 module_pci_driver(vmd_drv);
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH 3/3] PCI: vmd: Restore domain info during resets/unloads

[Jon Derrick]

Persistent domain info written by VMD BIOS needs to be restored by the
driver during module unloads or resets. This adds a remove or reset
action to restore the parsed domain info to all enabled VMD Root Ports.

Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
index dbe1bff..853aa93 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
@@ -562,6 +562,33 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
 				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
 		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else
 
+static void vmd_restore_domain(void *data)
+{
+	struct vmd_dev *vmd = data;
+	int root_port;
+	u32 temp, iobase;
+
+	/*
+	 * It shouldn't be possible for the Root Port layout to change
+	 * dynamically (outside of BIOS), however there is no harm in writing
+	 * the persistent data back to all enabled Root Ports. PCI resource
+	 * assignment will discard any modifications on the next VMD domain bus
+	 * scan following VMD reset/probe.
+	 */
+	for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, root_port, temp) {
+		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),
+				 PCI_IO_BASE, 2, &iobase))
+			return;
+
+		iobase &= ~((0xf << 4) | (0x3 << 14));
+		iobase |= vmd->socket_nr << 4 | vmd->instance_nr << 14;
+
+		if (vmd_cfg_write(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),
+				  PCI_IO_BASE, 2, iobase))
+			return;
+	}
+}
+
 static int vmd_parse_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
 {
 	int root_port, ret;
@@ -579,6 +606,11 @@ static int vmd_parse_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
 		vmd->socket_nr = (iobase >> 4) & 0xf;
 		vmd->instance_nr = (iobase >> 14) & 0x3;
 
+		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&vmd->dev->dev,
+					       vmd_restore_domain, vmd);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
 		/* First available will be used */
 		break;
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> 
> To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> information and expose it to userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> index 959c7c7..dbe1bff 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct vmd_dev {
>  	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
>  	struct pci_bus		*bus;
>  	u8			busn_start;
> +	u8			socket_nr;
> +	u8			instance_nr;
>  
>  	struct dma_map_ops	dma_ops;
>  	struct dma_domain	dma_domain;
> @@ -543,6 +545,74 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
>  	.write		= vmd_pci_write,
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> + *
> + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
> + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> + */
> +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else

Nit: I do not think this macro is particularly helpful or easy to read.

I leave it up to you but I would turn this code (plus the inner loop in
vmd_parse_domain()) into a function, eg:

struct vmd_dev *vmd_find_first_root_port(..)

with the code in the macro above inlined. Up to you.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> +static int vmd_parse_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
> +{
> +	int root_port, ret;
> +	u32 temp, iobase;
> +
> +	vmd->socket_nr = -1;
> +	vmd->instance_nr = -1;
> +
> +	for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, root_port, temp) {
> +		ret = vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),
> +				   PCI_IO_BASE, 2, &iobase);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		vmd->socket_nr = (iobase >> 4) & 0xf;
> +		vmd->instance_nr = (iobase >> 14) & 0x3;
> +
> +		/* First available will be used */
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t socket_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->socket_nr);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(socket_nr);
> +
> +static ssize_t instance_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->instance_nr);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(instance_nr);
> +
> +static struct attribute *vmd_dev_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_socket_nr.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_instance_nr.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(vmd_dev);
> +
>  static void vmd_attach_resources(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
>  {
>  	vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR1].child = &vmd->resources[1];
> @@ -582,6 +652,11 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
>  	resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
>  	resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000;
>  	struct pci_bus *child;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = vmd_parse_domain(vmd);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Shadow registers may exist in certain VMD device ids which allow
> @@ -591,7 +666,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
>  	 */
>  	if (features & VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW) {
>  		u32 vmlock;
> -		int ret;
>  
>  		membar2_offset = MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET + MB2_SHADOW_SIZE;
>  		ret = pci_read_config_dword(vmd->dev, PCI_REG_VMLOCK, &vmlock);
> @@ -876,7 +950,8 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	.probe		= vmd_probe,
>  	.remove		= vmd_remove,
>  	.driver		= {
> -		.pm	= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> +		.pm		= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> +		.dev_groups	= vmd_dev_groups,
>  	},
>  };
>  module_pci_driver(vmd_drv);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Andrew Murray]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> 
> To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> information and expose it to userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> index 959c7c7..dbe1bff 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct vmd_dev {
>  	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
>  	struct pci_bus		*bus;
>  	u8			busn_start;
> +	u8			socket_nr;
> +	u8			instance_nr;
>  
>  	struct dma_map_ops	dma_ops;
>  	struct dma_domain	dma_domain;
> @@ -543,6 +545,74 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
>  	.write		= vmd_pci_write,
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> + *
> + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
> + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> + */
> +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else

You may want to consider using PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE here instead of 0xffffffff.
Though this hasn't yet been merged:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=126820

> +
> +static int vmd_parse_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
> +{
> +	int root_port, ret;
> +	u32 temp, iobase;
> +
> +	vmd->socket_nr = -1;
> +	vmd->instance_nr = -1;
> +
> +	for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, root_port, temp) {
> +		ret = vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),
> +				   PCI_IO_BASE, 2, &iobase);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		vmd->socket_nr = (iobase >> 4) & 0xf;
> +		vmd->instance_nr = (iobase >> 14) & 0x3;

I'm not familiar with VMD - however how can you be sure that the VMD BIOS
will always populate these values here? Is it possible that earlier BIOS's
won't do this and something will go wrong here?

Is there any sanity checking that can happen here?

> +
> +		/* First available will be used */
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t socket_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->socket_nr);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(socket_nr);
> +
> +static ssize_t instance_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->instance_nr);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(instance_nr);
> +
> +static struct attribute *vmd_dev_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_socket_nr.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_instance_nr.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(vmd_dev);
> +
>  static void vmd_attach_resources(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
>  {
>  	vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR1].child = &vmd->resources[1];
> @@ -582,6 +652,11 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
>  	resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
>  	resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000;
>  	struct pci_bus *child;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = vmd_parse_domain(vmd);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

This always will succeed. But what happens if this function returns yet
socket_nr/instance_nr hasn't been written to? Is that OK?

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Shadow registers may exist in certain VMD device ids which allow
> @@ -591,7 +666,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
>  	 */
>  	if (features & VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW) {
>  		u32 vmlock;
> -		int ret;
>  
>  		membar2_offset = MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET + MB2_SHADOW_SIZE;
>  		ret = pci_read_config_dword(vmd->dev, PCI_REG_VMLOCK, &vmlock);
> @@ -876,7 +950,8 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	.probe		= vmd_probe,
>  	.remove		= vmd_remove,
>  	.driver		= {
> -		.pm	= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> +		.pm		= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> +		.dev_groups	= vmd_dev_groups,
>  	},
>  };
>  module_pci_driver(vmd_drv);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Derrick, Jonathan]

Hi ANdrew,

Thanks for the review

On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 13:16 +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > 
> > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > information and expose it to userspace.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > index 959c7c7..dbe1bff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct vmd_dev {
> >  	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
> >  	struct pci_bus		*bus;
> >  	u8			busn_start;
> > +	u8			socket_nr;
> > +	u8			instance_nr;
> >  
> >  	struct dma_map_ops	dma_ops;
> >  	struct dma_domain	dma_domain;
> > @@ -543,6 +545,74 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
> >  	.write		= vmd_pci_write,
> >  };
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> > + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> > + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> > + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> > + *
> > + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> > + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
> > + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> > + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> > + */
> > +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> > +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> > +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> > +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> > +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else
> 
> You may want to consider using PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE here instead of 0xffffffff.
> Though this hasn't yet been merged:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=126820
> 

Sure it will fit this case perfectly once it's merged

> > +
> > +static int vmd_parse_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
> > +{
> > +	int root_port, ret;
> > +	u32 temp, iobase;
> > +
> > +	vmd->socket_nr = -1;
> > +	vmd->instance_nr = -1;
> > +
> > +	for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, root_port, temp) {
> > +		ret = vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),
> > +				   PCI_IO_BASE, 2, &iobase);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> > +		vmd->socket_nr = (iobase >> 4) & 0xf;
> > +		vmd->instance_nr = (iobase >> 14) & 0x3;
> 
> I'm not familiar with VMD - however how can you be sure that the VMD BIOS
> will always populate these values here? Is it possible that earlier BIOS's
> won't do this and something will go wrong here?
> 
> Is there any sanity checking that can happen here?

Yes that's entirely possible and would show indeterminate values in
that case. It would be up to the user to understand if the BIOS
supports the mode before relying on the data.

I am investigating to see if we can do a dmi_match to verify the data
before publishing.


> 
> > +
> > +		/* First available will be used */
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t socket_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> > +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->socket_nr);
> > +}
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(socket_nr);
> > +
> > +static ssize_t instance_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> > +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->instance_nr);
> > +}
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(instance_nr);
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *vmd_dev_attrs[] = {
> > +	&dev_attr_socket_nr.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_instance_nr.attr,
> > +	NULL
> > +};
> > +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(vmd_dev);
> > +
> >  static void vmd_attach_resources(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
> >  {
> >  	vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR1].child = &vmd->resources[1];
> > @@ -582,6 +652,11 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> >  	resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
> >  	resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000;
> >  	struct pci_bus *child;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = vmd_parse_domain(vmd);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> 
> This always will succeed. But what happens if this function returns yet
> socket_nr/instance_nr hasn't been written to? Is that OK?
> 

Basically only one possibility that could occur and that's if the VMD
is enabled without any VMD Root Ports being enabled on the VMD domain.
It's an odd configuration but is technically valid, although the domain
becomes useless until the user reboots and enables the VMD Root Ports. 

So it's more-or-less implied either socket_nr/instance_nr will have
data or the domain won't be usable.

Thanks,
Jon


> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Murray
> 
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Shadow registers may exist in certain VMD device ids which allow
> > @@ -591,7 +666,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (features & VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW) {
> >  		u32 vmlock;
> > -		int ret;
> >  
> >  		membar2_offset = MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET + MB2_SHADOW_SIZE;
> >  		ret = pci_read_config_dword(vmd->dev, PCI_REG_VMLOCK, &vmlock);
> > @@ -876,7 +950,8 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  	.probe		= vmd_probe,
> >  	.remove		= vmd_remove,
> >  	.driver		= {
> > -		.pm	= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> > +		.pm		= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> > +		.dev_groups	= vmd_dev_groups,
> >  	},
> >  };
> >  module_pci_driver(vmd_drv);
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Andrew Murray]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:24:02PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> Hi ANdrew,
> 
> Thanks for the review
> 
> On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 13:16 +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > > 
> > > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > > information and expose it to userspace.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > > index 959c7c7..dbe1bff 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > > @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct vmd_dev {
> > >  	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
> > >  	struct pci_bus		*bus;
> > >  	u8			busn_start;
> > > +	u8			socket_nr;
> > > +	u8			instance_nr;
> > >  
> > >  	struct dma_map_ops	dma_ops;
> > >  	struct dma_domain	dma_domain;
> > > @@ -543,6 +545,74 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
> > >  	.write		= vmd_pci_write,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +/**
> > > + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> > > + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> > > + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> > > + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> > > + *
> > > + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> > > + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
> > > + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> > > + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> > > + */
> > > +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> > > +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> > > +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> > > +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> > > +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else
> > 
> > You may want to consider using PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE here instead of 0xffffffff.
> > Though this hasn't yet been merged:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=126820
> > 
> 
> Sure it will fit this case perfectly once it's merged
> 
> > > +
> > > +static int vmd_parse_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
> > > +{
> > > +	int root_port, ret;
> > > +	u32 temp, iobase;
> > > +
> > > +	vmd->socket_nr = -1;
> > > +	vmd->instance_nr = -1;
> > > +
> > > +	for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, root_port, temp) {
> > > +		ret = vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),
> > > +				   PCI_IO_BASE, 2, &iobase);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			return ret;
> > > +
> > > +		vmd->socket_nr = (iobase >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > +		vmd->instance_nr = (iobase >> 14) & 0x3;
> > 
> > I'm not familiar with VMD - however how can you be sure that the VMD BIOS
> > will always populate these values here? Is it possible that earlier BIOS's
> > won't do this and something will go wrong here?
> > 
> > Is there any sanity checking that can happen here?
> 
> Yes that's entirely possible and would show indeterminate values in
> that case. It would be up to the user to understand if the BIOS
> supports the mode before relying on the data.
> 
> I am investigating to see if we can do a dmi_match to verify the data
> before publishing.

I think that would be helpful if possible as it would simplify the
user software - and also prevent the user ever getting garbage data.

> 
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > > +		/* First available will be used */
> > > +		break;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static ssize_t socket_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> > > +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +
> > > +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->socket_nr);
> > > +}
> > > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(socket_nr);
> > > +
> > > +static ssize_t instance_nr_show(struct device *dev,
> > > +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > +	struct vmd_dev *vmd = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +
> > > +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", vmd->instance_nr);
> > > +}
> > > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(instance_nr);
> > > +
> > > +static struct attribute *vmd_dev_attrs[] = {
> > > +	&dev_attr_socket_nr.attr,
> > > +	&dev_attr_instance_nr.attr,
> > > +	NULL
> > > +};
> > > +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(vmd_dev);
> > > +
> > >  static void vmd_attach_resources(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
> > >  {
> > >  	vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR1].child = &vmd->resources[1];
> > > @@ -582,6 +652,11 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> > >  	resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
> > >  	resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000;
> > >  	struct pci_bus *child;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = vmd_parse_domain(vmd);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > 
> > This always will succeed. But what happens if this function returns yet
> > socket_nr/instance_nr hasn't been written to? Is that OK?
> > 
> 
> Basically only one possibility that could occur and that's if the VMD
> is enabled without any VMD Root Ports being enabled on the VMD domain.
> It's an odd configuration but is technically valid, although the domain
> becomes useless until the user reboots and enables the VMD Root Ports. 
> 
> So it's more-or-less implied either socket_nr/instance_nr will have
> data or the domain won't be usable.

Of course in this case, the default value will be -1, which should be
quite obvious to a user that this isn't a valid value.

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

> 
> Thanks,
> Jon
> 
> 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andrew Murray
> > 
> > >  
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * Shadow registers may exist in certain VMD device ids which allow
> > > @@ -591,7 +666,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> > >  	 */
> > >  	if (features & VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW) {
> > >  		u32 vmlock;
> > > -		int ret;
> > >  
> > >  		membar2_offset = MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET + MB2_SHADOW_SIZE;
> > >  		ret = pci_read_config_dword(vmd->dev, PCI_REG_VMLOCK, &vmlock);
> > > @@ -876,7 +950,8 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
> > >  	.probe		= vmd_probe,
> > >  	.remove		= vmd_remove,
> > >  	.driver		= {
> > > -		.pm	= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> > > +		.pm		= &vmd_dev_pm_ops,
> > > +		.dev_groups	= vmd_dev_groups,
> > >  	},
> > >  };
> > >  module_pci_driver(vmd_drv);
> > > -- 
> > > 1.8.3.1
> > > 

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Bjorn Helgaas]

[+cc Andrew]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> 
> To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> information and expose it to userspace.

Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand this, but it sounds possibly fragile.
Are these Root Ports visible to the generic PCI core device
enumeration?  If so, it will find them and read these I/O window
registers.  Maybe today the PCI core doesn't change them, but I'm not
sure we should rely on them always being preserved until the vmd
driver can claim the device.

But I guess you're using a special config accessor (vmd_cfg_read()),
so these are probably invisible to the generic enumeration?

> + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> + *
> + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD

I'm not sure how to parse "determinately accessed".  Maybe this config
space can *only* be accessed via the VMD Config BAR?

> + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> + */
> +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Derrick, Jonathan]

Hi Bjorn,

On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 16:53 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Andrew]
> 
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > 
> > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > information and expose it to userspace.
> 
> Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand this, but it sounds possibly fragile.
> Are these Root Ports visible to the generic PCI core device
> enumeration?  If so, it will find them and read these I/O window
> registers.  Maybe today the PCI core doesn't change them, but I'm not
> sure we should rely on them always being preserved until the vmd
> driver can claim the device.
> 

The Root Ports are on the VMD PCI domain, and this IO BASE/LIMIT
parsing occurs before this PCI domain is exposed to the generic PCI
scancode with pci_scan_child_bus(). Until that point the VMD PCI domain
is invisible to the kernel outside of /dev/mem or resource0.

However, yes, it is somewhat fragile in that a third-party driver could
attach to the VMD endpoint prior to the VMD driver and modify the
values. A /dev/mem or resource0 user could also do this on an
unattached VMD endpoint.

I'm wondering if this would also be better suited for a special reset
in quirks.c, but it would need to expose a bit of VMD config accessing
in quirks.c to do that.

> But I guess you're using a special config accessor (vmd_cfg_read()),
> so these are probably invisible to the generic enumeration?
> 

Yes the VMD domain is invisible to generic PCI until the domain is
enumerated late in vmd_enable_domain().

> > + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> > + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> > + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> > + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> > + *
> > + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> > + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
> 
> I'm not sure how to parse "determinately accessed".  Maybe this config
> space can *only* be accessed via the VMD Config BAR?

Perhaps it should instead say determinately addressed, as each Root
Port config space is addressable at some offset of N * 0x8000 from the
base of the VMD endpoint config bar. I can see the comment may not be
helpful as that detail is abstracted using the vmd_cfg_read() helper.


> 
> > + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> > + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> > + */
> > +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> > +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> > +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> > +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> > +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:16:39PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 16:53 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Andrew]
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > > 
> > > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > > information and expose it to userspace.
> > 
> > Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand this, but it sounds possibly fragile.
> > Are these Root Ports visible to the generic PCI core device
> > enumeration?  If so, it will find them and read these I/O window
> > registers.  Maybe today the PCI core doesn't change them, but I'm not
> > sure we should rely on them always being preserved until the vmd
> > driver can claim the device.
> > 
> 
> The Root Ports are on the VMD PCI domain, and this IO BASE/LIMIT
> parsing occurs before this PCI domain is exposed to the generic PCI
> scancode with pci_scan_child_bus(). Until that point the VMD PCI domain
> is invisible to the kernel outside of /dev/mem or resource0.

That's because the VMD controller is a PCI device itself and its
BARs values are used to configure the VMD host controller.

Interesting.

To add to Bjorn's question, this reasoning assumes that whatever
code enumerates the PCI device representing the VMD host controller
does not overwrite its BARs upon bus enumeration otherwise the VMD
controller configuration would be lost. Am I reading the current
code correctly ?

I assume there is not anything you can do to add firmware bindings to
the VMD host controller PCI device to describe these properties you are
exporting, so config space is the only available conduit to report them
to an OS.

Lorenzo

> However, yes, it is somewhat fragile in that a third-party driver could
> attach to the VMD endpoint prior to the VMD driver and modify the
> values. A /dev/mem or resource0 user could also do this on an
> unattached VMD endpoint.
> 
> I'm wondering if this would also be better suited for a special reset
> in quirks.c, but it would need to expose a bit of VMD config accessing
> in quirks.c to do that.
> 
> > But I guess you're using a special config accessor (vmd_cfg_read()),
> > so these are probably invisible to the generic enumeration?
> > 
> 
> Yes the VMD domain is invisible to generic PCI until the domain is
> enumerated late in vmd_enable_domain().
> 
> > > + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> > > + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> > > + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> > > + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> > > + *
> > > + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> > > + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
> > 
> > I'm not sure how to parse "determinately accessed".  Maybe this config
> > space can *only* be accessed via the VMD Config BAR?
> 
> Perhaps it should instead say determinately addressed, as each Root
> Port config space is addressable at some offset of N * 0x8000 from the
> base of the VMD endpoint config bar. I can see the comment may not be
> helpful as that detail is abstracted using the vmd_cfg_read() helper.
> 
> 
> > 
> > > + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> > > + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> > > + */
> > > +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> > > +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> > > +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> > > +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> > > +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 06:07:00PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:16:39PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 16:53 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > [+cc Andrew]
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > > > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > > > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > > > 
> > > > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > > > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > > > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > > > information and expose it to userspace.
> > > 
> > > Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand this, but it sounds possibly fragile.
> > > Are these Root Ports visible to the generic PCI core device
> > > enumeration?  If so, it will find them and read these I/O window
> > > registers.  Maybe today the PCI core doesn't change them, but I'm not
> > > sure we should rely on them always being preserved until the vmd
> > > driver can claim the device.
> > > 
> > 
> > The Root Ports are on the VMD PCI domain, and this IO BASE/LIMIT
> > parsing occurs before this PCI domain is exposed to the generic PCI
> > scancode with pci_scan_child_bus(). Until that point the VMD PCI domain
> > is invisible to the kernel outside of /dev/mem or resource0.
> 
> That's because the VMD controller is a PCI device itself and its
> BARs values are used to configure the VMD host controller.
> 
> Interesting.
> 
> To add to Bjorn's question, this reasoning assumes that whatever
> code enumerates the PCI device representing the VMD host controller
> does not overwrite its BARs upon bus enumeration otherwise the VMD
> controller configuration would be lost. Am I reading the current
> code correctly ?

Sorry, I just went through the code again, I think the VMD controller
PCI device BARs can and are allowed to be reassigned by the PCI
enumeration code - I misread the code, so I raised a non-existent issue
here, they are like any other PCI device MEM/IO BARs in this respect.

Lorenzo

> I assume there is not anything you can do to add firmware bindings to
> the VMD host controller PCI device to describe these properties you are
> exporting, so config space is the only available conduit to report them
> to an OS.
> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> > However, yes, it is somewhat fragile in that a third-party driver could
> > attach to the VMD endpoint prior to the VMD driver and modify the
> > values. A /dev/mem or resource0 user could also do this on an
> > unattached VMD endpoint.
> > 
> > I'm wondering if this would also be better suited for a special reset
> > in quirks.c, but it would need to expose a bit of VMD config accessing
> > in quirks.c to do that.
> > 
> > > But I guess you're using a special config accessor (vmd_cfg_read()),
> > > so these are probably invisible to the generic enumeration?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes the VMD domain is invisible to generic PCI until the domain is
> > enumerated late in vmd_enable_domain().
> > 
> > > > + * for_each_vmd_root_port - iterate over all enabled VMD Root Ports
> > > > + * @vmd: &struct vmd_dev VMD device descriptor
> > > > + * @rp: int iterator cursor
> > > > + * @temp: u32 temporary value for config read
> > > > + *
> > > > + * VMD Root Ports are located in the VMD PCIe Domain at 00:[0-3].0, and config
> > > > + * space can be determinately accessed through the VMD Config BAR. Because VMD
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure how to parse "determinately accessed".  Maybe this config
> > > space can *only* be accessed via the VMD Config BAR?
> > 
> > Perhaps it should instead say determinately addressed, as each Root
> > Port config space is addressable at some offset of N * 0x8000 from the
> > base of the VMD endpoint config bar. I can see the comment may not be
> > helpful as that detail is abstracted using the vmd_cfg_read() helper.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > + * Root Ports can be individually disabled, it's important to iterate for the
> > > > + * first enabled Root Port as determined by reading the Vendor/Device register.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define for_each_vmd_root_port(vmd, rp, temp)				\
> > > > +	for (rp = 0; rp < 4; rp++)					\
> > > > +		if (vmd_cfg_read(vmd, 0, PCI_DEVFN(root_port, 0),	\
> > > > +				 PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &temp) ||		\
> > > > +		    temp == 0xffffffff) {} else

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Derrick, Jonathan]

On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 10:12 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 06:07:00PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:16:39PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 16:53 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > [+cc Andrew]
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > > > > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > > > > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > > > > 
> > > > > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > > > > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > > > > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > > > > information and expose it to userspace.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand this, but it sounds possibly fragile.
> > > > Are these Root Ports visible to the generic PCI core device
> > > > enumeration?  If so, it will find them and read these I/O window
> > > > registers.  Maybe today the PCI core doesn't change them, but I'm not
> > > > sure we should rely on them always being preserved until the vmd
> > > > driver can claim the device.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The Root Ports are on the VMD PCI domain, and this IO BASE/LIMIT
> > > parsing occurs before this PCI domain is exposed to the generic PCI
> > > scancode with pci_scan_child_bus(). Until that point the VMD PCI domain
> > > is invisible to the kernel outside of /dev/mem or resource0.
> > 
> > That's because the VMD controller is a PCI device itself and its
> > BARs values are used to configure the VMD host controller.
> > 
> > Interesting.
> > 
> > To add to Bjorn's question, this reasoning assumes that whatever
> > code enumerates the PCI device representing the VMD host controller
> > does not overwrite its BARs upon bus enumeration otherwise the VMD
> > controller configuration would be lost. Am I reading the current
> > code correctly ?
> 
> Sorry, I just went through the code again, I think the VMD controller
> PCI device BARs can and are allowed to be reassigned by the PCI
> enumeration code - I misread the code, so I raised a non-existent issue
> here, they are like any other PCI device MEM/IO BARs in this respect.
> 
> Lorenzo
> 

Yes the VMD endpoint itself exposes the domain containing the Root
Ports. It's the Root Ports which get enumerated by generic PCI
scancode, and also the Root Port config space where this domain info is
supplied. Without a VMD driver, the only aperture to access the Root
Port config space is MMIO through the VMD endpoint's 'Config' BAR (aka
MEMBAR0).

Without this patch, a /dev/mem, resource0, or third-party driver could
overwrite these values if they don't also restore them on close/unbind.
I imagine a kexec user would also overwrite these values.

This is one of the reasons I was also thinking it could live in device
specific reset code as long as it can call into VMD for the specifics.
Many kernel vendors already ship with VMD=y, so I am tempted to simply
make that permanent and export a reset call to a dev specific reset in
quirks.c.

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Keith Busch]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:32:07PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> Without this patch, a /dev/mem, resource0, or third-party driver could
> overwrite these values if they don't also restore them on close/unbind.
> I imagine a kexec user would also overwrite these values.

Don't you have the same problem with the in-kernel driver? It
looks like pci core will clear the PCI_IO_BASE config registers in
pci_setup_bridge_io() because VMD doesn't provide an IORESOURCE_IO
resource. If you reload the driver, it'll read the wrong values on the
second probing.

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Derrick, Jonathan]

On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 07:22 +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:32:07PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > Without this patch, a /dev/mem, resource0, or third-party driver could
> > overwrite these values if they don't also restore them on close/unbind.
> > I imagine a kexec user would also overwrite these values.
> 
> Don't you have the same problem with the in-kernel driver? It
> looks like pci core will clear the PCI_IO_BASE config registers in
> pci_setup_bridge_io() because VMD doesn't provide an IORESOURCE_IO
> resource. If you reload the driver, it'll read the wrong values on the
> second probing.

Is there a corner case I am missing with patch 3/3 that restores on
unload?

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Keith Busch]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:38:05PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 07:22 +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:32:07PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > > Without this patch, a /dev/mem, resource0, or third-party driver could
> > > overwrite these values if they don't also restore them on close/unbind.
> > > I imagine a kexec user would also overwrite these values.
> > 
> > Don't you have the same problem with the in-kernel driver? It
> > looks like pci core will clear the PCI_IO_BASE config registers in
> > pci_setup_bridge_io() because VMD doesn't provide an IORESOURCE_IO
> > resource. If you reload the driver, it'll read the wrong values on the
> > second probing.
> 
> Is there a corner case I am missing with patch 3/3 that restores on
> unload?

Nothing wrong with that. I just hadn't read that far :/

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:32:07PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 10:12 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 06:07:00PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:16:39PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 16:53 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > [+cc Andrew]
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > > > > > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > > > > > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > > > > > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > > > > > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > > > > > information and expose it to userspace.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand this, but it sounds possibly fragile.
> > > > > Are these Root Ports visible to the generic PCI core device
> > > > > enumeration?  If so, it will find them and read these I/O window
> > > > > registers.  Maybe today the PCI core doesn't change them, but I'm not
> > > > > sure we should rely on them always being preserved until the vmd
> > > > > driver can claim the device.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The Root Ports are on the VMD PCI domain, and this IO BASE/LIMIT
> > > > parsing occurs before this PCI domain is exposed to the generic PCI
> > > > scancode with pci_scan_child_bus(). Until that point the VMD PCI domain
> > > > is invisible to the kernel outside of /dev/mem or resource0.
> > > 
> > > That's because the VMD controller is a PCI device itself and its
> > > BARs values are used to configure the VMD host controller.
> > > 
> > > Interesting.
> > > 
> > > To add to Bjorn's question, this reasoning assumes that whatever
> > > code enumerates the PCI device representing the VMD host controller
> > > does not overwrite its BARs upon bus enumeration otherwise the VMD
> > > controller configuration would be lost. Am I reading the current
> > > code correctly ?
> > 
> > Sorry, I just went through the code again, I think the VMD controller
> > PCI device BARs can and are allowed to be reassigned by the PCI
> > enumeration code - I misread the code, so I raised a non-existent issue
> > here, they are like any other PCI device MEM/IO BARs in this respect.
> > 
> > Lorenzo
> > 
> 
> Yes the VMD endpoint itself exposes the domain containing the Root
> Ports. It's the Root Ports which get enumerated by generic PCI
> scancode, and also the Root Port config space where this domain info is
> supplied. Without a VMD driver, the only aperture to access the Root
> Port config space is MMIO through the VMD endpoint's 'Config' BAR (aka
> MEMBAR0).
> 
> Without this patch, a /dev/mem, resource0, or third-party driver could
> overwrite these values if they don't also restore them on close/unbind.
> I imagine a kexec user would also overwrite these values.
> 
> This is one of the reasons I was also thinking it could live in device
> specific reset code as long as it can call into VMD for the specifics.
> Many kernel vendors already ship with VMD=y, so I am tempted to simply
> make that permanent and export a reset call to a dev specific reset in
> quirks.c.

Hi Jon,

just wanted to ask you what's the plan with this series.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Expose VMD details from BIOS

[Derrick, Jonathan]

On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 10:38 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:32:07PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 10:12 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 06:07:00PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:16:39PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > > > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 16:53 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > [+cc Andrew]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:04:47AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > > > > > > When some VMDs are enabled and others are not, it's difficult to
> > > > > > > determine which IIO stack corresponds to the enabled VMD.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > To assist userspace with management tasks, VMD BIOS will write the VMD
> > > > > > > instance number and socket number into the first enabled root port's IO
> > > > > > > Base/Limit registers prior to OS handoff. VMD driver can capture this
> > > > > > > information and expose it to userspace.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand this, but it sounds possibly fragile.
> > > > > > Are these Root Ports visible to the generic PCI core device
> > > > > > enumeration?  If so, it will find them and read these I/O window
> > > > > > registers.  Maybe today the PCI core doesn't change them, but I'm not
> > > > > > sure we should rely on them always being preserved until the vmd
> > > > > > driver can claim the device.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The Root Ports are on the VMD PCI domain, and this IO BASE/LIMIT
> > > > > parsing occurs before this PCI domain is exposed to the generic PCI
> > > > > scancode with pci_scan_child_bus(). Until that point the VMD PCI domain
> > > > > is invisible to the kernel outside of /dev/mem or resource0.
> > > > 
> > > > That's because the VMD controller is a PCI device itself and its
> > > > BARs values are used to configure the VMD host controller.
> > > > 
> > > > Interesting.
> > > > 
> > > > To add to Bjorn's question, this reasoning assumes that whatever
> > > > code enumerates the PCI device representing the VMD host controller
> > > > does not overwrite its BARs upon bus enumeration otherwise the VMD
> > > > controller configuration would be lost. Am I reading the current
> > > > code correctly ?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I just went through the code again, I think the VMD controller
> > > PCI device BARs can and are allowed to be reassigned by the PCI
> > > enumeration code - I misread the code, so I raised a non-existent issue
> > > here, they are like any other PCI device MEM/IO BARs in this respect.
> > > 
> > > Lorenzo
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes the VMD endpoint itself exposes the domain containing the Root
> > Ports. It's the Root Ports which get enumerated by generic PCI
> > scancode, and also the Root Port config space where this domain info is
> > supplied. Without a VMD driver, the only aperture to access the Root
> > Port config space is MMIO through the VMD endpoint's 'Config' BAR (aka
> > MEMBAR0).
> > 
> > Without this patch, a /dev/mem, resource0, or third-party driver could
> > overwrite these values if they don't also restore them on close/unbind.
> > I imagine a kexec user would also overwrite these values.
> > 
> > This is one of the reasons I was also thinking it could live in device
> > specific reset code as long as it can call into VMD for the specifics.
> > Many kernel vendors already ship with VMD=y, so I am tempted to simply
> > make that permanent and export a reset call to a dev specific reset in
> > quirks.c.
> 
> Hi Jon,
> 
> just wanted to ask you what's the plan with this series.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo



Please drop. We've implemented a different solution.

Thanks again,
Jon