From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ERR: Resolve regression in pcie_do_recovery
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:35:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d72b2b0c-6842-3d76-5b13-2fbb3d25d73f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18897ceb-2263-1101-ae43-918a66794e14@linux.intel.com>
Hi Jay,
On 4/29/20 6:15 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>
>
> On 4/29/20 5:42 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Commit 6d2c89441571 ("PCI/ERR: Update error status after
>> reset_link()"), introduced a regression, as pcie_do_recovery will
>> discard the status result from report_frozen_detected. This can cause a
>> failure to recover if _NEED_RESET is returned by report_frozen_detected
>> and report_slot_reset is not invoked.
>>
>> Such an event can be induced for testing purposes by reducing
>> the Max_Payload_Size of a PCIe bridge to less than that of a device
>> downstream from the bridge, and then initating I/O through the device,
>> resulting in oversize transactions. In the presence of DPC, this
>> results in a containment event and attempted reset and recovery via
>> pcie_do_recovery. After 6d2c89441571 report_slot_reset is not invoked,
>> and the device does not recover.
>
> I think this issue is related to the issue discussed in following
> thread (DPC non-hotplug support).
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/328
>
> If my assumption is correct, you are dealing with devices which are
> not hotplug capable. If the devices are hotplug capable then you don't
> need to proceed to report_slot_reset(), since hotplug handler will
> remove/re-enumerate the devices correctly.
Can you check whether following fix works for you?
This includes support for bus_reset in recovery function itself.
index 14bb8f54723e..c9eaab68ab7a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
@@ -165,13 +165,23 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
pci_walk_bus(bus, report_frozen_detected, &status);
- status = reset_link(dev);
- if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
+ status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET;
+ } else {
+ pci_walk_bus(bus, report_normal_detected, &status);
+ }
+
+ if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) {
+ if (reset_link)
+ if (reset_link(dev) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
+ status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
+ else
+ if (pci_bus_error_reset(dev))
+ status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
+
+ if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT) {
pci_warn(dev, "link reset failed\n");
goto failed;
}
- } else {
- pci_walk_bus(bus, report_normal_detected, &status);
}
if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER) {
>
>>
>> Inspection shows a similar path is plausible for a return of
>> _CAN_RECOVER and the invocation of report_mmio_enabled.
>>
>> Resolve this by preserving the result of report_frozen_detected if
>> reset_link does not return _DISCONNECT.
>>
>> Fixes: 6d2c89441571 ("PCI/ERR: Update error status after reset_link()")
>> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 11 +++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>> index 14bb8f54723e..e4274562f3a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>> @@ -164,10 +164,17 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev
>> *dev,
>> pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
>> if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
>> + pci_ers_result_t status2;
>> +
>> pci_walk_bus(bus, report_frozen_detected, &status);
>> - status = reset_link(dev);
>> - if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>> + /* preserve status from report_frozen_detected to
>> + * insure report_mmio_enabled or report_slot_reset are
>> + * invoked even if reset_link returns _RECOVERED.
>> + */
>> + status2 = reset_link(dev);
>> + if (status2 != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>> pci_warn(dev, "link reset failed\n");
>> + status = status2;
>> goto failed;
>> }
>> } else {
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-30 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-30 0:42 [PATCH] PCI/ERR: Resolve regression in pcie_do_recovery Jay Vosburgh
2020-04-30 1:15 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-04-30 19:35 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2020-04-30 20:41 ` Jay Vosburgh
2020-05-06 18:08 ` Jay Vosburgh
2020-05-09 6:35 ` Yicong Yang
2020-05-09 17:55 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-05-09 8:34 ` Yicong Yang
[not found] <20200506203249.GA453633@bjorn-Precision-5520>
2020-05-07 0:56 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d72b2b0c-6842-3d76-5b13-2fbb3d25d73f@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).