From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5894C433C1 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3F46192B for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230315AbhC0IRz (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 04:17:55 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:15350 "EHLO szxga07-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230288AbhC0IRr (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 04:17:47 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F6s9B2YVnz945J; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:15:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.177.160] (10.174.177.160) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:17:40 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Correct function names in the header To: =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=c5=84ski?= CC: , , , , , References: <20210325075144.180030-1-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> From: Xiongfeng Wang Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:17:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.160] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi, Krzysztof On 2021/3/26 9:07, Krzysztof WilczyƄski wrote: > Hi, > > [...] >> PCI: acpi_pcihp: Correct acpi_pci_check_ejectable() function name in >> the header >> PCI/AER: Correct function names in the header >> PCI/PME: Correct pcie_pme_init() function name in the header >> PCI/ATS: Correct pci_max_pasids() function name in header > [...] > > All of this has already been fixed in the following series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210311001724.423356-1-kw@linux.com/ Thanks for your remind. I will skip this series in the future. Thanks, Xiongfeng > > Krzysztof > . >