linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"  <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ashok.raj@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/5] Simplify PCIe native ownership
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:16:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2438472-5367-f6fb-d8e0-f6a6273cbf82@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1611364024.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

Hi Bjorn,

On 1/22/21 5:11 PM, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Currently, PCIe capabilities ownership status is detected by
> verifying the status of pcie_ports_native, and _OSC negotiated
> results (cached in  struct pci_host_bridge->native_* members).
> But this logic can be simplified, and we can use only struct
> pci_host_bridge ->native_* members to detect it.
> 
> This patchset removes the distributed checks for pcie_ports_native,
> parameter.
Any comments on this patch set?
> 
> Changes since v12:
>   * Rebased on top of v5.11-rc1
> 
> Changes since v11 (Bjorns update):
>   * Add bugfix for DPC with no AER Capability
>   * Split OSC_OWNER trivial changes from pcie_ports_native changes
>   * Temporarily drop pcie_ports_dpc_native changes (revisit it later).
> 
> Changes since v10:
>   * Addressed format issue reported by lkp test.
> 
> Changes since v9:
>   * Rebased on top of v5.10-rc1
> 
> Changes since v8:
>   * Simplified setting _OSC ownwership logic
>   * Moved bridge->native_ltr out of #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS.
> 
> Changes since v7:
>   * Fixed "fix array_size.cocci warnings".
> 
> Changes since v6:
>   * Created new patch for CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS check in
>     pci_init_host_bridge().
>   * Added warning message for a case when pcie_ports_native
>     overrides _OSC negotiation result.
> 
> Changes since v5:
>   * Rebased on top of v5.8-rc1
> 
> Changes since v4:
>   * Changed the patch set title (Original link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/1710)
>   * Added AER/DPC dependency logic cleanup fixes.
> 
> Bjorn Helgaas (2):
>    PCI/DPC: Ignore devices with no AER Capability
>    PCI/ACPI: Centralize pci_aer_available() checking
> 
> Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan (3):
>    PCI: Assume control of portdrv-related features only when portdrv
>      enabled
>    PCI/ACPI: Tidy _OSC control bit checking
>    PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking
> 
>   drivers/acpi/pci_root.c           | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c |  2 +-
>   drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c            |  3 --
>   drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c            |  2 +-
>   drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c            |  3 ++
>   drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c   | 11 +++----
>   drivers/pci/probe.c               |  6 ++--
>   7 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-18 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-23  1:11 [PATCH v13 0/5] Simplify PCIe native ownership Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-01-23  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 1/5] PCI/DPC: Ignore devices with no AER Capability Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-01-23  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 2/5] PCI: Assume control of portdrv-related features only when portdrv enabled Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-01-23  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 3/5] PCI/ACPI: Tidy _OSC control bit checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-01-23  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 4/5] PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-01-23  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 5/5] PCI/ACPI: Centralize pci_aer_available() checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-03-18 20:16 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2438472-5367-f6fb-d8e0-f6a6273cbf82@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).