From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1896C64E8A for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 02:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911B921D7E for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 02:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727589AbgLBCIM (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:08:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41428 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726412AbgLBCIM (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:08:12 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33CDCC0613CF for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 18:07:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id v92so211233ybi.4 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:07:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CjwbtncPbogbIDD0Gg+rLiO4d1+jiP/isiqdMbl8Qv0=; b=uohgXlFa6vgFpYEfgkgQvWYYdM0JwyPgGuWN9qiWk4cqWoqKhFk3lWoIJjf+SEWV4f WJJdh1wMSLRWSBlFCUhvQU71GKUyBBeaLzsbumGpYfaUan5nHPP5xXvruRdQRvnVhEjm ZITHKH4/bZGoM2Q2MCrcqpNjTKHfEVi200KZ6HKZq2MLe7o/nWKzsU61cwK2qiTVSPJt 8bAoYolSo4TZvijmqIAGoaYazsVAdhoKU6/Da35h3W7rLNInJ3o1G7XoifbetTieDGRk vSIge7oyQgz/xVvcQYq+gVpBJoROSxILhWZqAyBRLOoggkbPHGRYgrQzpfph6GJBBqAd gR2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=CjwbtncPbogbIDD0Gg+rLiO4d1+jiP/isiqdMbl8Qv0=; b=Cz5jOU3ae6iQe+9v5E9Nvqd2V/4wsEfLV+9sEqt4lCfsTXInrO0l5GUII5Y2KWWtHE 6BRW8/DTjd7KRkgtJhmQVEaYR35NH7PTx8X7ye4fbY1JxzWQdb9zuvZhvfa0rwADILID hv9zat3rL/AmUBq9JuCgMV4iFvIcSFJVFpw3OeaNFGiXf/NseDVJtcLo+4JaQxyFBo4a ydr8BcYYaxDD2prULGF2RHXzaTjeoEIWm7VCTzqiwSOAv/uU5EuGOKo1yfX8ULbaOWd0 S54c6gaGRICCjCOIrJQx5auQ43Oowm4ba54iWxoWD9Se/1HK6MnR8gA34EYweC47hFMS 0NgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ob2IB8GCmFNKbfHO8dimBstcLMFxe/uyVNCa6D/ShBjiRa9cx Y/mLqUUIUxeBy9rUPDebyXnI81Fz5RodieaEvTT5V8hqVx9Sl3mt X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRBIHnBdVGbE3eZOmidN/EzJbQxDjso5IGFFukx4A5Mjt2e4guflik6wrfE1fANYPQ6Idw+e3bmWZ5UDge3bo= X-Received: by 2002:a25:905:: with SMTP id 5mr589606ybj.44.1606874851342; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:07:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?7ZWc66+47ISg?= Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 18:05:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Asking about PMU tool issues To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, pmu-tools@halobates.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Hello, I am Miseon Han. Currently, I am using jevents of PMU-tools for testing and gathering addresses of memory accesses. However, I have an issue that the number of gathered addresses is too small even if the memory footprint size of the target is quite large. I opened issues in pmu-tools/issues of github site - issue number 364 In the page, more details are written. Could you help me to solve this issue?