From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf tools: Get a perf cgroup more portably in BPF
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:11:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzGlH51Idwet/NE9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWwNwtocMR3s1Su2k2vZAwL4yhX19UGZ4i0dMXFDFFBJA@mail.gmail.com>
Em Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 09:45:19AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:32 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The perf_event_cgrp_id can be different on other configurations.
> > To be more portable as CO-RE, it needs to get the cgroup subsys id
> > using the bpf_core_enum_value() helper.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Would be good to get this into perf/urgent, does it need Fixes tags for that?
I got it into the perf/urgent branch.
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > ---
> > v4 changes)
> > * add a missing check in the off_cpu
> >
> > v3 changes)
> > * check compiler features for enum value
> >
> > v2 changes)
> > * fix off_cpu.bpf.c too
> > * get perf_subsys_id only once
> >
> > tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/bperf_cgroup.bpf.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/bperf_cgroup.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/bperf_cgroup.bpf.c
> > index 292c430768b5..8e7520e273db 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/bperf_cgroup.bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/bperf_cgroup.bpf.c
> > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ const volatile __u32 num_cpus = 1;
> >
> > int enabled = 0;
> > int use_cgroup_v2 = 0;
> > +int perf_subsys_id = -1;
> >
> > static inline int get_cgroup_v1_idx(__u32 *cgrps, int size)
> > {
> > @@ -58,7 +59,15 @@ static inline int get_cgroup_v1_idx(__u32 *cgrps, int size)
> > int level;
> > int cnt;
> >
> > - cgrp = BPF_CORE_READ(p, cgroups, subsys[perf_event_cgrp_id], cgroup);
> > + if (perf_subsys_id == -1) {
> > +#if __has_builtin(__builtin_preserve_enum_value)
> > + perf_subsys_id = bpf_core_enum_value(enum cgroup_subsys_id,
> > + perf_event_cgrp_id);
> > +#else
> > + perf_subsys_id = perf_event_cgrp_id;
> > +#endif
> > + }
> > + cgrp = BPF_CORE_READ(p, cgroups, subsys[perf_subsys_id], cgroup);
> > level = BPF_CORE_READ(cgrp, level);
> >
> > for (cnt = 0; i < MAX_LEVELS; i++) {
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
> > index c4ba2bcf179f..38e3b287dbb2 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ const volatile bool has_prev_state = false;
> > const volatile bool needs_cgroup = false;
> > const volatile bool uses_cgroup_v1 = false;
> >
> > +int perf_subsys_id = -1;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Old kernel used to call it task_struct->state and now it's '__state'.
> > * Use BPF CO-RE "ignored suffix rule" to deal with it like below:
> > @@ -119,11 +121,19 @@ static inline __u64 get_cgroup_id(struct task_struct *t)
> > {
> > struct cgroup *cgrp;
> >
> > - if (uses_cgroup_v1)
> > - cgrp = BPF_CORE_READ(t, cgroups, subsys[perf_event_cgrp_id], cgroup);
> > - else
> > - cgrp = BPF_CORE_READ(t, cgroups, dfl_cgrp);
> > + if (!uses_cgroup_v1)
> > + return BPF_CORE_READ(t, cgroups, dfl_cgrp, kn, id);
> > +
> > + if (perf_subsys_id == -1) {
> > +#if __has_builtin(__builtin_preserve_enum_value)
> > + perf_subsys_id = bpf_core_enum_value(enum cgroup_subsys_id,
> > + perf_event_cgrp_id);
> > +#else
> > + perf_subsys_id = perf_event_cgrp_id;
> > +#endif
> > + }
> >
> > + cgrp = BPF_CORE_READ(t, cgroups, subsys[perf_subsys_id], cgroup);
> > return BPF_CORE_READ(cgrp, kn, id);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.3.998.g577e59143f-goog
> >
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-23 6:32 [PATCH v4] perf tools: Get a perf cgroup more portably in BPF Namhyung Kim
2022-09-23 16:45 ` Ian Rogers
2022-09-26 13:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-09-26 13:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzGlH51Idwet/NE9@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).