From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85F5C4332F for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 10:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229673AbiJPKf7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:35:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36090 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229595AbiJPKfw (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:35:52 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2480 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 03:35:50 PDT Received: from spamfilter04.delta.nl (spamfilter04.delta.nl [217.102.255.204]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4024136BE1; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 03:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host-xbmmyvj.static.zeelandnet.nl ([217.102.255.196] helo=mail.caiway.net) by spamfilter04.delta.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <8vvbbqzo567a@nospam.xutrox.com>) id 1ok0Kj-0006b8-TE; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:53:36 +0200 Received: from smtp-out.lan.xutrox.com (189-082-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl [62.45.82.189]) (Authenticated sender: gv47feqf@mail.intern) by mail.caiway.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:53:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.16.159] (unknown [10.1.16.159]) by smtp-out.lan.xutrox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD187FC02; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 09:53:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xutrox.com; s=2021; t=1665913994; bh=VQr+zN5IdSJbTkt6kZSoTfCjC9CX89lo5WSU4Oh51VA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=SlVzWhM7gzHyrWf2Is+cmnv8P8Uo0HLvkivrHHJE8gYHky1ZvU7ZYdcwPa+T9GJwA ewvNlk4ABzGekkmfyqXHWrMRFCV12l6Iu+DJuQsKXUT3I6FWx212vIO320VW9HWZGl yjRXK6sSHozL7QtcqZaWZcXqtGN/Slm7/4NmURjAMwaf0ZVcjUS9tdRXaoB0CgHktm 6yC5utpO67rCd3gfmMibbuKhfFwtzr2eax66Kgm+byaiA2O+IfxqRwTsg/3MSjYBgq TKIO/TfIQpsKWH6ixxHVCyrhdJplPd+jIRUey3K/7+sBWyYQMz0eCuCYwsZmwCP4RQ TitNRIs/OtU3Q== Message-ID: Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:53:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Fixed kernel panic during boot on Nano processor. Content-Language: en-US To: Peter Zijlstra , Cody Yao-oc Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shyaololo@163.com References: <20210607013109.7870-1-CodyYao-oc@zhaoxin.com> From: Arjan <8vvbbqzo567a@nospam.xutrox.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 217.102.255.196 X-DELTA-Domain: out.caiw.net X-DELTA-Username: 217.102.255.196 Authentication-Results: delta.nl; auth=pass smtp.auth=217.102.255.196@out.caiw.net X-DELTA-Outgoing-Class: ham X-DELTA-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.08) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT8UY4s+Yiu0pHmfimn9rvSlPUtbdvnXkggZ 3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5yc/ZmA9xtuv+B4ejtZ8Y/XuPlWyU6WxHGGYJjeNxb2qsSt 0Cf6BPNJWEBZ4JVsQN2Mj8c81Cqq49L7i7V2/TcPuK4qf9MvYgQQjDkqI/9rxZYoT8DGBXy9+Yr+ O7G/xc58iEjXbHIdUQr1yb+WzViLwOkTB5HjLhmTNASxhQlKkawLonlImQFKvyumeIUlInTJUFW9 jMbE4Gan+bbHWts97JtuyuUsa+UkJaUpT81goTMcT+7lBOhaiNMPjogKlwA2Vz6Xcl+tcewiMUdS 9dKp8n/ecEa8Dg/FYK5/AG7c3Xw3coVFbzLPseyHEBSmYPf2enzXTs9rqT37lCgCUdR3idMlhCno /QsYaTlhyywkGTkQIfeYgYqBXZFMF+hHi7rcf/ofBF/wWxzMV48oEn/pX75TBHUZZhA+DSPCGwhb mf1nsk4XUhGRAVSQpqHRZWu93416zKEUrygEsuACwklwhBZ1D9MqB0vOkd39ScIXDIgADrxOtZX/ G/2/IJHRpYsEybI1sOftHmSKUCHCvcq0i2Zoq6H6kLA4Wl2kUl3ga+YBpscYeJb04ZvY3orHnLCK HGDdRzytiKbUp5w/JDfjebFJIl8Cs2xleGSAiDR0kCabsfRx4e7LLFIZzYf71k1ClA4krEnjzezq sOHwFT1OAkiBzRd+qpW+h72Ly10vJ2hraNDvBTgk5sUe41aq+SbzpCXrf0wnye0NpXW7y7JFdi8F 1nhlaeIl7TcXogHLA82+93NDCACMp6nbho+VuenoAhng0cApE3VnDyxWqS9ije49tZ/AcfXvRATR Wfdyiz8vhaAa0BbMupM+1agz5SFBoGfS0DhK3BfvFNI4fRpBbmGFHU0Fd1FYwiLqVhSu3v+nCpyC SdscG09FH1xvLyw/tCJWEi8ikJPyVPcxcTsmzrq2gEhTddRghHFF286eW2BECiVcqfxUH1CXsod1 GDa9T/D6wRI1MwUDobWxsDnf++DuIQUs/5JJj4C/n4CILggDdEKjdWhTTSQUWki9GRqNDKzYrBQ8 NNYoick+UCNl6vQnbmdnIXmBiVs3DrWG6v8kkzJ31DiVWTkrDNDmTiVVH+9CVL3ZB2Yyd7DOQnkJ c+51jBq98UG160e1tbsqSvYKd+OWea/Dn/mjjvtwA+77nfS+qgRPwgrzwXmMZRRk1iZMHnbCQPlM eZImJMYmx+j2jy7rLCNyHfKB6IlRR4onrYqVWrke6X16VTjUWV4aXRiJsFizJhuZn6xfjuGHi1Ff EoXm0/FPF8PR0w363lka9gcwIn77Mi4NfMLw8oY1HjvSW5VJBhs3pLhA8z4xo5yTaZvlrLgXEO04 ZsCn8Z2KSYfpjFwwpPrz3Gl8pJ0O2/zI9E4NYCVW2CC1DqO4EoK1MmeO+fNxBbg9NxwRtrmOhbzN 5d3B/nx3oA8VLWDbIggCLPUzTJVdE6cxsYCz0RNkJWOv/F0pffRTyrYlS8M= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@spamfilter03.delta.nl Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On 13-10-2022 17:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 09:31:09AM +0800, Cody Yao-oc wrote: >> From: CodyYao-oc >> >> Nano processor may not fully support rdpmc instruction, it works well >> for reading general pmc counter, but will lead to GP(general protection) >> when accessing fixed pmc counter. Futhermore, family/model information >> is same between Nano processor and ZX-C processor, it leads to zhaoxin >> pmu driver is wrongly loaded for Nano processor, which resulting boot >> kernal fail. >> >> To solve this problem, stepping information will be checked to distinguish >> between Nano processor and ZX-C processor. >> >> [https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212389] >> >> Reported-by: Arjan <8vvbbqzo567a@nospam.xutrox.com> >> Signed-off-by: CodyYao-oc > > *sigh*.. so this email address doesn't exist, as such I can't apply this > patch. Consider it dropped. If it's about my email address: The address exists and works. If the nospam part bothers you, that part can be left out. You may leave the reported-by line out if you want to.