From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBADC433FE for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D3161391 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:34:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 27D3161391 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RMZJX0jkweXY1peMa4efTBKlGW3d1s6FKbwi7F5UH/Q=; b=W+1KjSKXg/9aOA BuinZiBcKLKvN5XWQEteBpVJUn0KzuEnyiE5POVgVoHEi9Yjg5xm7JLkJaYq2cxRPO2wio5ttJEkx IBb7ZT8c9DVLiuZj5EYEvxbagNbrOp9YlMkFvBpgepIgR7bel5I5x0xPvsG6GM2Ha4bpm7OXMTqwE D5bnLsyWmCCvLBmM8yLyHipJ7F5dP84EFFwnIJEbXdpAloNLbrWaBCNB6QdvTFI3tl9KlQ5TCtkLn PFXC920ExMwQsjRbKl+C68NfSkpVF7evIyvGEnGxWJ2dgGbl1rifQMz6qRxnpYlRvL7tARBoal21R KwSW0rBzIAQqCgNXqdFg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mdDbo-0054P1-E8; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:34:28 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mdDb8-005457-UF for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:33:48 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33CFB6138D; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:33:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1634744026; bh=jBdWab4OKhYc8JaRPHjIC13TNSnNaWnujTT2HR8+MKM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=B9idrXL7JpUuXPnOOCwXygUCkvEED4EztCPUYeEKntUYf26Hvo2zODzUwx1NCxjMd y/+QGzCd4UfPUwIB7fS0PdGZufeejaL/q8495wnjhMynw80plzsc2znJVG1MsnExnX 6/qMPpe0Y8/WdWBo2Pjucjyz0LA0nKwS2tafQXRDXT6vzqzAAxWqxn6GlEKNYbUn09 7QQH06EeVyxaY6k4yUKQuWXiwk/zV697ptqCa0sUjFB69vhUMNzPS9z4MxmSQJsPIW qpTKyEwP2orU1+n8i3kMbR1tCYy3UODUVwj9ccpOaIUxkHJcMoFIOAeHIr/D3LOO5Z dVi8I3uY4d/aA== Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:03:42 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Shawn Guo Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 02/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: IPQ6018 and IPQ8074 PCIe PHY require no supply Message-ID: References: <20210929034253.24570-3-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20211020130634.26194-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211020130634.26194-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211020_083347_036957_E62DACF9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.00 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 20-10-21, 21:06, Shawn Guo wrote: > The qmp-phy driver suggests that 'vdda-phy-supply' and 'vdda-pll-supply' > are not required for IPQ6018 and IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY. Update the > bindings to reflect it. > > While at it, also correct the clock properies for IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY. s/properies/properties > And as the result, 'qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy' and > 'qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy' share the same clock, reset and supply > bindings. I have fixed that up while applying and also picked the Ack from Rob (please pick those when resending) Thanks -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy