From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Linux PM'" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 0/5] cpuidle: teo: Rework the idle state selection logic
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:06:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000801d78322$e9b94980$bd2bdc80$@telus.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1867445.PYKUYFuaPT@kreacher>
Hi Rafael,
Further to my reply of 2021.07.04 on this, I have
continued to work with and test this patch set.
On 2021.06.02 11:14 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This series of patches addresses some theoretical shortcoming in the
> TEO (Timer Events Oriented) cpuidle governor by reworking its idle
> state selection logic to some extent.
>
> Patches [1-2/5] are introductory cleanups and the substantial changes are
> made in patches [3-4/5] (please refer to the changelogs of these two
> patches for details). The last patch only deals with documentation.
>
> Even though this work is mostly based on theoretical considerations, it
> shows a measurable reduction of the number of cases in which the shallowest
> idle state is selected while it would be more beneficial to select a deeper
> one or the deepest idle state is selected while it would be more beneficial to
> select a shallower one, which should be a noticeable improvement.
I am concentrating in the idle state 0 and 1 area.
When I disable idle state 0, the expectation is its
usage will fall to idle state 1. It doesn't.
Conditions:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz
HWP: disabled
CPU frequency scaling driver: intel_pstate, active
CPU frequency scaling governor: performance.
Idle configuration: As a COMETLAKE processor, with 4 idle states.
Sample time for below: 1 minute.
Workflow: Cross core named pipe token passing, 12 threads.
Kernel 5.14-rc3: idle: teo governor
All idle states enabled: PASS
Processor: 97 watts
Idle state 0 entries: 811151
Idle state 1 entries: 140300776
Idle state 2 entries: 889
Idle state 3 entries: 8
Idle state 0 disabled: FAIL <<<<<
Processor: 96 watts
Idle state 0 entries: 0
Idle state 1 entries: 65599283
Idle state 2 entries: 364399
Idle state 3 entries: 65112651
Kernel 5.14-rc3: idle: menu governor
All idle states enabled: PASS
Processor: 102 watts
Idle state 0 entries: 169320747
Idle state 1 entries: 1860110
Idle state 2 entries: 14
Idle state 3 entries: 54
Idle state 0 disabled: PASS
Processor: 96.7 watts
Idle state 0 entries: 0
Idle state 1 entries: 141936790
Idle state 2 entries: 0
Idle state 3 entries: 6
Prior to this patch set:
Kernel 5.13: idle: teo governor
All idle states enabled: PASS
Processor: 97 watts
Idle state 0 entries: 446735
Idle state 1 entries: 140903027
Idle state 2 entries: 0
Idle state 3 entries: 0
Idle state 0 disabled: PASS
Processor: 96 watts
Idle state 0 entries: 0
Idle state 1 entries: 139308125
Idle state 2 entries: 0
Idle state 3 entries: 0
I haven't tried to isolate the issue in the code, yet.
Nor have I explored to determine if there might
be other potential idle state disabled issues.
... Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-02 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/5] cpuidle: teo: Rework the idle state selection logic Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-02 18:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] cpuidle: teo: Cosmetic modifications of teo_update() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-02 18:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] cpuidle: teo: Cosmetic modification of teo_select() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-02 18:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] cpuidle: teo: Change the main idle state selection logic Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-02 18:17 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] cpuidle: teo: Rework most recent idle duration values treatment Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-02 18:18 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] cpuidle: teo: Use kerneldoc documentation in admin-guide Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-04 21:01 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] cpuidle: teo: Rework the idle state selection logic Doug Smythies
2021-07-05 13:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-27 20:06 ` Doug Smythies [this message]
2021-07-28 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-28 17:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-29 6:34 ` Doug Smythies
2021-07-29 15:23 ` Doug Smythies
2021-07-29 16:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-29 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-30 3:36 ` Doug Smythies
2021-07-30 13:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000801d78322$e9b94980$bd2bdc80$@telus.net' \
--to=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).