From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06720C432C1 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF99A207FD for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telus.net header.i=@telus.net header.b="JK8xERef" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406705AbfIXRwV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:52:21 -0400 Received: from cmta20.telus.net ([209.171.16.93]:47517 "EHLO cmta20.telus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726910AbfIXRwU (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:52:20 -0400 Received: from dougxps ([173.180.45.4]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id CoyziGLdmN5I9Coz0iV9ND; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:52:19 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telus.net; s=neo; t=1569347539; bh=H/XOP2fKipCtKvfVrIfB/bod/HsAwHO9dwoqUJh3Vmw=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=JK8xERefjpCMRSd429miCFrrPAEMqXvG/eOfsrhP21bvGjR7/bTgkx2zBM/slmxrB XVupk5r/vRq5mX/5OkaGevz1bbdF9Z9dWm32zfn/mI+t/LCKQh3HiBugU6Li/TpQ6V iPL1xRLPly4FCqem7gAPprOWEPZY5E2wOyOnRm5633W0jeQ43VdR73C+Ezgb31TUEd FPIMIcpTQPbBZlAr8vaJ1mFztMP6P+sM3qw7jwhZZB0D20FkT/iPQkgry4CVaJ3zRA FFMOOwW1C4YCJHrJ0Ps0Ekq11/PeM5VrHZ5s2nd77wNUesc/AWaGTkYxyGMJAx5zK7 T/2xJmFqRS8JA== X-Telus-Authed: none X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=K/Fc4BeI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=zJWegnE7BH9C0Gl4FFgQyA==:117 a=zJWegnE7BH9C0Gl4FFgQyA==:17 a=Pyq9K9CWowscuQLKlpiwfMBGOR0=:19 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=aatUQebYAAAA:8 a=aCwPpCUuJDWdtZRKGx0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=7715FyvI7WU-l6oqrZBK:22 From: "Doug Smythies" To: "'Mel Gorman'" Cc: "'Giovanni Gherdovich'" , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20190909024216.5942-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <20190909024216.5942-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <000e01d568b5$87de9be0$979bd3a0$@net> <000301d56a76$0022e630$0068b290$@net> <1568730313.3329.1.camel@suse.cz> <001a01d56ef8$7abb07c0$70311740$@net> <20190924080608.GA3321@techsingularity.net> In-Reply-To: <20190924080608.GA3321@techsingularity.net> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:52:13 -0700 Message-ID: <000b01d57300$cf611ce0$6e2356a0$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: en-ca Thread-Index: AdVyrvSM5wisEN5wR+e/x84tTXNN3QAT9lPw X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCgcBy1c7Po5AHQoWI4xadnUF/6gDYl0DmdDkj0h/8f4Q6rS7PSt42oPKQSlXfJ9s13UoXpUp1M/R616MMHftQmbwg36GhHPFSOnX4fBItc4C39OKmOd WhHWONSXcUUwmjncbyI4PSkyKoQ3F2HaXDMIyU5OFnXzGVvlAGWsYEcBVDWk0u48H+yIxb0oI5nHzWYD0ITXVq3vPukQHinPr+XFkuVCWbIkqV1OnADoPFgr i1wfnArLathDVIo3TSLlVlHEDPRWuhfIGwdBonbgEhjQZkVTytEgrFQPQLoFws8tsPEPPteNTH+iVkZMxtyFEtV/IuQDmVWKYn35OOuppbpBCwnTDjEPybHK Oz/p+kFPqTONaNjcI7SQLqHj9O8kjsi0cCph8O56W38wP13ZL9Ka3N7gfe5q+1q9FHT81skToQB8QN1lTf2uoLmxQFGzYN9xdCARBYat8yIbhXzS6SertJ81 dtuVNyipLJhKs5cI3vaOkrtktZyg1JtMgL/wxQjcT/K9RLpOVgmrefxrOjM6XyTdF9WHjWRYuFriVeXy5KQq+haxglv4q06f8hl667VWt4go+H6aUkav5dZ8 X0MEUZrain0CWdhSqqMHl+O7WSL2nnLGk2reA/pHNpAUL4LH4d2X9UU74J0cYRsEVLoZbz/GFmWIY+mD7creLKyPHr1FKuY5R4GU3OqyYTGyoaVeVsEqUwop 4RZjsyBUDpuTqja3p+3ANNu+ijV3va9/nrqM9qSiXwsCixmdNr652Q== Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 2019.09.24 01:06 Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 07:42:29AM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote: >> On 2019.09.17 07:25 Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: >>>On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 08:28 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote: >>> [...] > > Hence, I think this patchset should be considered on its own merits. Agree. > I think the patch is fine and should be merged with the main caveat being > that some CPU families may need to use a different calculation to account > for turbo boost which is a per-arch and per-cpu-family decision. Agree. > What, if anything, should change in this patchset before it can be merged? Nothing, and apologies for the tangential discussion. > Is that an acked-by? Absolutely, if I am worthy of ack'ing then: Acked-by: Doug Smythies ... Doug