linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: "'Viresh Kumar'" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"'Rafael Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Vincent Guittot'" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	<joel@joelfernandes.org>, "'v4 . 18+'" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't skip freq update when limits change
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:10:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001201d54125$a6a82350$f3f869f0$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8091ef83f264feb2feaa827fbeefe08348bcd05d.1563778071.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 2019.07.21 23:52 Viresh Kumar wrote:

> To avoid reducing the frequency of a CPU prematurely, we skip reducing
> the frequency if the CPU had been busy recently.
> 
> This should not be done when the limits of the policy are changed, for
> example due to thermal throttling. We should always get the frequency
> within limits as soon as possible.
>
> Fixes: ecd288429126 ("cpufreq: schedutil: Don't set next_freq to UINT_MAX")
> Cc: v4.18+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18+
> Reported-by: Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> @Doug: Please try this patch, it must fix the issue you reported.

It fixes the driver = acpi-cpufreq ; governor = schedutil test case
It does not fix the driver = intel_cpufreq ; governor = schedutil test case

I have checked my results twice, but will check again in the day or two.

... Doug

>
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 636ca6f88c8e..b53c4f02b0f1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>  	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
> 	unsigned long util, max;
>  	unsigned int next_f;
> -	bool busy;
> +	bool busy = false;
> 
> 	sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
> 	sg_cpu->last_update = time;
> @@ -457,7 +457,9 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> 	if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
>		return;
> 
> -	busy = sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
> +	/* Limits may have changed, don't skip frequency update */
> +	if (!sg_policy->need_freq_update)
> +		busy = sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
> 
> 	util = sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
>  	max = sg_cpu->max;
> -- 
> 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b



  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-18  6:26 [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Don't set next_freq to UINT_MAX" Doug Smythies
2019-07-18 10:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-18 15:46   ` Doug Smythies
2019-07-22  6:49     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-22  6:51 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't skip freq update when limits change Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  7:10   ` Doug Smythies [this message]
2019-07-23  9:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-23  9:15     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23 10:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-24 11:43         ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-25 15:20           ` Doug Smythies
2019-07-26  3:26             ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-26  6:57             ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-29  7:55               ` Doug Smythies
2019-07-29  8:32                 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-29  8:37                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01  0:20                     ` Doug Smythies
2019-08-01  6:17                       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-01  7:47                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01  7:55                           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-01 17:57                         ` Doug Smythies
2019-08-02  3:48                           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-02  9:11                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02  9:19                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06  4:00                               ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-31  2:58 Viresh Kumar
2019-07-31 23:19 ` Doug Smythies

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001201d54125$a6a82350$f3f869f0$@net' \
    --to=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).