linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
To: <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	<Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com>, <Thanu.Rangarajan@arm.com>
Cc: <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	<john.garry@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: change '.set_boost' to act on only one policy
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 19:57:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <060a79bb-00d0-982a-4e4b-1cf4511ccce2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589888489-13828-2-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>



On 2020/5/19 19:41, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> Macro 'for_each_active_policy()' is defined internally. To avoid some
> cpufreq driver needing this macro to iterate over all the policies in
> '.set_boost' callback, we redefine '.set_boost' to act on only one
> policy and pass the policy as an argument.
> 'cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()' iterate over all the policies to set
> boost for the system. This is preparation for adding SW BOOST support
> for CPPC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |  4 ++--
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c      | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h        |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 289e8ce..b0a9eb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void boost_set_msr_each(void *p_en)
>  	boost_set_msr(enable);
>  }
>  
> -static int set_boost(int val)
> +static int set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int val)
>  {
>  	get_online_cpus();
>  	on_each_cpu(boost_set_msr_each, (void *)(long)val, 1);
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static ssize_t store_cpb(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
>  	if (ret || val > 1)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	set_boost(val);
> +	set_boost(policy, val);
>  
>  	return count;
>  }

My original thought is as below. Since '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost'
can be used to set boost for the system. The file 'cpb' below each policy can be
used to set boost for the policy. But this will change the existing logic.

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -126,12 +126,14 @@ static void boost_set_msr_each(void *p_en)
        boost_set_msr(enable);
 }

-static int set_boost(int val)
+static int set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int val)
 {
        get_online_cpus();
-   on_each_cpu(boost_set_msr_each, (void *)(long)val, 1);
+ on_each_cpu_mask(policy->cpus, boost_set_msr_each,
+                  (void *)(long)val, 1);
        put_online_cpus();
-   pr_debug("Core Boosting %sabled.\n", val ? "en" : "dis");
+ pr_debug("CPU %*pbl: Core Boosting %sabled.\n",
+          cpumask_pr_args(policy->cpus), val ? "en" : "dis");

        return 0;
 }
@@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ static ssize_t store_cpb(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf,
        if (ret || val > 1)
                return -EINVAL;

-   set_boost(val);
+ set_boost(policy, val);

        return count;
 }

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index d03f250..d0d86b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>
>  int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>  {
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> @@ -2570,16 +2565,22 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>  	cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = state;
>  	write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>  
> -	ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(state);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> -		cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
> -		write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> -
> -		pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n",
> -		       __func__, state ? "enable" : "disable");
> +	for_each_active_policy(policy) {
> +		ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, state);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_reset_state;
>  	}
>  
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_reset_state:
> +	write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> +	cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
> +	write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> +
> +	pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n",
> +	       __func__, state ? "enable" : "disable");
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }

Is it better to set 'boost_enabled' after set boost successfully rather than
setting it in the begining and resetting it if setting boost failed.

Thanks,
Xiongfeng

>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 67d5950..3494f67 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
>  
>  	/* platform specific boost support code */
>  	bool		boost_enabled;
> -	int		(*set_boost)(int state);
> +	int		(*set_boost)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state);
>  };
>  
>  /* flags */
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-19 11:41 [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] add SW BOOST support for CPPC Xiongfeng Wang
2020-05-19 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: change '.set_boost' to act on only one policy Xiongfeng Wang
2020-05-19 11:57   ` Xiongfeng Wang [this message]
2020-05-20  4:59   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-05-20 10:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-20 10:41       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-05-19 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] CPPC: add support for SW BOOST Xiongfeng Wang
2020-05-20  5:00   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-05-21  6:25     ` Xiongfeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=060a79bb-00d0-982a-4e4b-1cf4511ccce2@huawei.com \
    --to=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Thanu.Rangarajan@arm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).