From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20130612080002.3f382ee1@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1370941408-29304-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi Viresh, > On 11 June 2013 14:33, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > This patch series introduces support for CPU overclocking technique > > called Boost. > > > > It is a follow up of a LAB governor proposal. Boost is a LAB > > component: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1484746/match=cpufreq > > > > Boost unifies hardware based solution (e.g. Intel Nehalem) with > > software oriented one (like the one done at Exynos). > > For this reason cpufreq/freq_table code has been reorganized to > > include common code. > > To be honest, I haven't given a review to patches 2/3 and 3/3 as I am > concerned more about 1/3. As you pointed out in the other mail 1/3 has its own issues, but I think that patches 2/3 and 3/3 are an integral part of the boost support and bring better overall overview to the design. > > Maybe you can just send v3 of 1/3. 2/3 and 3/3 can be sent when we > have finalized 2/3 and 3/3 's version. I'd opt for sending the whole patchset (it shouldn't be so difficult to adjust those patches), since it is easier for me to test. -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group