From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost framework Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:58:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20130626155823.47eb36fb@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1370941408-29304-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1370941408-29304-4-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:62855 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751355Ab3FZN6b (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:58:31 -0400 In-reply-to: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:35:32 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 11 June 2013 14:33, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the > > information related to boost support. > > > > When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, > > the low_level_boost pointer is filled with proper address. The > > .low_level_boost field filled to NULL, indicates that boost is not > > supported. > > This patch is still few generations back :) But this is v2 version of boost patches. Please also review: [PATCH v4 4/7] [PATCH v4 5/7] [PATCH v4 6/7] [PATCH v4 7/7] - disable boost at thermal framework -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group