Viresh, On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:14:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > That will be used by later patches to iterate over all cpufreq cooling devices. > Can you please refresh the series on top of latest Linus tree (material for 3.18-rc7) ? > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > index ddb97aa..f76a665 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > @@ -66,8 +66,11 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { > unsigned int cpufreq_val; > unsigned int max_level; > struct cpumask allowed_cpus; > + struct list_head head; Yadwinder has already introduced a list of cpu cooling devs: commit 2dcd851fe4b4fe60c2f8520bf7668d7e9b2dd76b Author: Yadwinder Singh Brar Date: Fri Nov 7 19:12:29 2014 +0530 thermal: cpu_cooling: Update always cpufreq policy with thermal constraints > }; > + > static DEFINE_IDR(cpufreq_idr); > +static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_dev_list); > static DEFINE_MUTEX(cooling_cpufreq_lock); > > static unsigned int cpufreq_dev_count; > @@ -372,6 +375,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, > goto remove_idr; > > cpufreq_dev->cool_dev = cool_dev; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpufreq_dev->head); > > mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); > > @@ -381,6 +385,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, > CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); > cpufreq_dev_count++; > > + list_add(&cpufreq_dev->head, &cpufreq_dev_list); > mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); > > return cool_dev; > @@ -451,6 +456,7 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) > cpufreq_dev = cdev->devdata; > mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); > cpufreq_dev_count--; > + list_del(&cpufreq_dev->head); > > /* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling device */ > if (cpufreq_dev_count == 0) > -- > 2.0.3.693.g996b0fd >