From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149C1C10F14 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AA52133D for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="QeJ7+BIL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727272AbfDJDvP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:51:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:33585 "EHLO mail-pf1-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726730AbfDJDvP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:51:15 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id h5so585170pfo.0 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:51:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=aSMT1m7f0apIK0kK/rQKyjCoBDQkWkakkLdNZuhWhG8=; b=QeJ7+BILYlzYsGFq5x0Qe/Uqwm+vDDFTlfP7VHyfMLRvaUXvBNMjJ4Y5QKxFyFK99a rr3gYFBsgozJlUwipx1ZnlxBAhDr1epdExLJMODJE4AvlpXxB09CfDHGQSelVbTRHIrb YHkDDSvGcv6Ym5bX/I3UmHRGTa3Zrw5rTjoSQDUGQkNzNnGieYBFr8pF7Nbi1Rf/n1y3 08I3tTSWkvqgRlxZqbBZR7g+CCTh2TA8dTumQhXNXHmF2oJbHEyPd1ZhTmQu/ZZ+G3dV l5Asev4IglslJnc4NfQ9rk7WGQVDtAkApJPoAB08RL+7ay8lZX+Ja3M5idYDcLfjdu6c PLMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=aSMT1m7f0apIK0kK/rQKyjCoBDQkWkakkLdNZuhWhG8=; b=BqHPWV5OR2NfIGRc87xBUyYg31ju8mhUsWdMq3tz2QdNTNCm1TnR51NHzwd5oiz780 4CgWL10KgOX/hxF3OQ/s63c4hWclnjVq9a+xQlV3pj2ybuH1qS66FqPZKxeLy05iRaQM GglSGPPkYN/Lb6YYULmjg4sCn26mbsj5TMSd9sCpkIlwHk4jFrqZrj16hcJlMpAqvxik xH06g3E/aIT1WhwZPZeHVp/IU2AMUugmPsdQ0xqn0xrSEvImAbgyBQEGTImRTMVQXGHr mDaCqQxR3onbuU9EFvt0cH+XbxT2MHxmbivMOvNw7E00+6XL+8e0AwYyay51u25ObcuL XiOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpx4vd9U2BkJVQ/2UfjQxR7/eJQojxIkkej2la2JuEZBq3VQUO nPwWF2fBM1Cjwv5XXkReTKgAzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxv/3wgOqtpi0oLdefsQJ8pLl+JW5GWXiWY3HLAJhm0MD6Y/Sg4kG/BNLBFN1QGb5Ae1LhxEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:530e:: with SMTP id h14mr3132702pgb.136.1554868274137; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.166.139.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm39295259pgv.8.2019.04.09.20.51.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:21:11 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, swboyd@chromium.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, dianders@chromium.org, rafael@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/11] DVFS in the OPP core Message-ID: <20190410035111.po3dgi5qiu67i652@vireshk-i7> References: <20190320094918.20234-1-rnayak@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190320094918.20234-1-rnayak@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323-120-3dd1ac Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20190410035111.-lYZaHxB7y4nseEr2I7rwjbYTqeKFIpT4royMg8hKo4@z> On 20-03-19, 15:19, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > This is a v2 of the RFC posted earlier by Stephen Boyd [1] > > As part of v2 I still follow the same approach of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() > API using clk framework to round the frequency passed and making it > accept 0 as a valid frequency indicating the frequency isn't required > anymore. It just has a few more drivers converted to use this approach > like dsi/dpu and ufs. > ufs demonstrates the case of having to handle multiple power domains, one > of which is scalable. I though we discussed about enabling/disabling clk as well from OPP core to simply driver ? I was expecting that to be part of this version :( -- viresh