* [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev_cc'
@ 2019-08-21 12:14 YueHaibing
2019-08-22 2:40 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2019-08-21 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: agross, rjw, viresh.kumar, sibis
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pm, linux-arm-msm, YueHaibing
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c: In function qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut:
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c:89:38: warning:
variable prev_cc set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
It is not used since commit 3003e75a5045 ("cpufreq:
qcom-hw: Update logic to detect turbo frequency")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 3eea197..a9ae2f8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
void __iomem *base)
{
- u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0, freq;
+ u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
u32 volt;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
@@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
break;
}
- prev_cc = core_count;
prev_freq = freq;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev_cc'
2019-08-21 12:14 [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev_cc' YueHaibing
@ 2019-08-22 2:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-22 4:55 ` Sibi Sankar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-08-22 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing; +Cc: agross, rjw, sibis, linux-kernel, linux-pm, linux-arm-msm
On 21-08-19, 20:14, YueHaibing wrote:
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c: In function qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut:
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c:89:38: warning:
> variable prev_cc set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> It is not used since commit 3003e75a5045 ("cpufreq:
> qcom-hw: Update logic to detect turbo frequency")
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index 3eea197..a9ae2f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> void __iomem *base)
> {
> - u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0, freq;
> + u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
> u32 volt;
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
>
> @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
> break;
> }
>
> - prev_cc = core_count;
> prev_freq = freq;
> }
@Sibi, you fine with this change ? I will merge it with the original patch then.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev_cc'
2019-08-22 2:40 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2019-08-22 4:55 ` Sibi Sankar
2019-08-22 6:01 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sibi Sankar @ 2019-08-22 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: YueHaibing, agross, rjw, linux-kernel, linux-pm, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-msm-owner
@YueHaibing thanks for the patch.
On 2019-08-22 08:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-08-19, 20:14, YueHaibing wrote:
>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c: In function
>> qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut:
>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c:89:38: warning:
>> variable prev_cc set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>
>> It is not used since commit 3003e75a5045 ("cpufreq:
>> qcom-hw: Update logic to detect turbo frequency")
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> index 3eea197..a9ae2f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device
>> *cpu_dev,
>> struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> void __iomem *base)
>> {
>> - u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0,
>> freq;
>> + u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
>> u32 volt;
>> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
>>
>> @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device
>> *cpu_dev,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - prev_cc = core_count;
>> prev_freq = freq;
>> }
>
> @Sibi, you fine with this change ? I will merge it with the original
> patch then.
yes the changes seem fine, I missed
removing prev_cc.
--
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev_cc'
2019-08-22 4:55 ` Sibi Sankar
@ 2019-08-22 6:01 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-08-22 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sibi Sankar
Cc: YueHaibing, agross, rjw, linux-kernel, linux-pm, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-msm-owner
On 22-08-19, 10:25, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> @YueHaibing thanks for the patch.
>
> On 2019-08-22 08:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 21-08-19, 20:14, YueHaibing wrote:
> > > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c: In function
> > > qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut:
> > > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c:89:38: warning:
> > > variable prev_cc set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > >
> > > It is not used since commit 3003e75a5045 ("cpufreq:
> > > qcom-hw: Update logic to detect turbo frequency")
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > index 3eea197..a9ae2f8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device
> > > *cpu_dev,
> > > struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > void __iomem *base)
> > > {
> > > - u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0,
> > > freq;
> > > + u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
> > > u32 volt;
> > > struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
> > >
> > > @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct
> > > device *cpu_dev,
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - prev_cc = core_count;
> > > prev_freq = freq;
> > > }
> >
> > @Sibi, you fine with this change ? I will merge it with the original
> > patch then.
>
> yes the changes seem fine, I missed
> removing prev_cc.
Thanks. Merged into the original patch itself.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-22 6:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-21 12:14 [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev_cc' YueHaibing
2019-08-22 2:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-22 4:55 ` Sibi Sankar
2019-08-22 6:01 ` Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).