From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3564C433DF for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 04:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F5A20760 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 04:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725771AbgGAEUV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:20:21 -0400 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.44]:35844 "EHLO out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725272AbgGAEUV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:20:21 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R111e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01358;MF=xhao@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=5;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U1EplZ._1593577218; Received: from localhost.localdomain(mailfrom:xhao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U1EplZ._1593577218) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:20:18 +0800 From: Xin Hao To: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, xhao@linux.alibaba.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf' value in cppc_perf_caps struct Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:20:07 +0800 Message-Id: <20200701042007.13333-1-xhao@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use 'caps->highest_perf' instead. Signed-off-by: Xin Hao --- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu, if (!max_khz) max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); mul = max_khz; - div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; + div = caps->highest_perf; } return (u64)perf * mul / div; } @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu, } else { if (!max_khz) max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); - mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; + mul = caps->highest_perf; div = max_khz; } -- 2.24.1