From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A3CC433E1 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA1620663 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="DezqCrAt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726890AbgGOCtz (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 22:49:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726836AbgGOCtz (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 22:49:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4F4C061794 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id f16so1566386pjt.0 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=q5vvXYd0T7QlyjZ+KGgsyakgUV75e/J/r/3oQdNc2Z8=; b=DezqCrAtzHMnxCsO8uGVnxD15BIn0IEeUuNsFF6BNaXJcE67PXoACB2NqCJsZ4YMJ6 IQfBwy4l2Ikj7pABYwwxJNXwhc8u73xQ20q5oPN99lPuNCa5jOV/MvLUN3SFhtI6m7Ov AB1DPqy+ndx22mCtf3jVpdGuDQ0GcrT8Wu+t09vRbD7RHq4a39UJgYi1qFRcEsGI65Fs PHLZbUodNCESvXzrUiaRxbbYKAiQBHDxeP593atEm8e5e8pw/XPaP62KysVY6Ka+sHP6 fh7AMRWHGZ+U0JWQbNJbDhFDsfj7BFFFxwSqKCK8ea4L8f4nSFgcZ3Nw6C+U+py9bhNh TqcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=q5vvXYd0T7QlyjZ+KGgsyakgUV75e/J/r/3oQdNc2Z8=; b=oBsm467DUpngqpNlE2KSNySo+CTLUZxmSYlZjLwBo0J8Cbh3wn8lX66lfLBaLuxkyb 8d3TDeHplQsyTiPyICWm5fFiP0Ar0/saT69I39+QroTpdWJ/9gUbM4dfGbjcAJ2IML4K RZvHKKFm37B7h0km6PMm4SD3/6hBzemruOA46LymEtuzS0uwl6q7ZKr8Sm/CBBiHrjZl UAnkKhAaG7hJO0kIlE9ycss9aINYyvkMSdAfu6PAQ3HVR2OOpYKBvMb/2T99UAHw2D8w puGazVXwKSQnTOEzNemHf78mPpQJKJeQtRSjnRjaq59cylCiaauLEZLjkhk2GP54RLuU U8JA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yrc5GiFUYp7l6zmbubP036g9bNJk7NPFhW+UtAcj+2ufRvDs5 Z5senrXhskygBi/baPDkDLtbYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBhKELTRjg9O0sSVH+78W39OnjWXN56hDD8UePtV9hJOoL5/dKy2apkTSELv77wUsEMtcZDg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:80c3:: with SMTP id k3mr7713771pjw.102.1594781394340; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.172.34.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k2sm404748pgm.11.2020.07.14.19.49.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 08:19:51 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Lee Jones Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Dominik Brodowski , Ashok Raj , Jacob Shin Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] cpufreq: cpufreq: Demote lots of function headers unworthy of kerneldoc status Message-ID: <20200715024951.zr36iuagany5ii56@vireshk-i7> References: <20200714145049.2496163-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20200714145049.2496163-3-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200714145049.2496163-3-lee.jones@linaro.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > -/** > +/* > * cpufreq_remove_dev - remove a CPU device Because cpufreq_add_dev() is part of kernel doc, we better keep it. > * > * Removes the cpufreq interface for a CPU device. > @@ -2373,6 +2374,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor); > * cpufreq_get_policy - get the current cpufreq_policy > * @policy: struct cpufreq_policy into which the current cpufreq_policy > * is written > + * @cpu: CPU to find the policy for > * > * Reads the current cpufreq policy. > */ > @@ -2759,7 +2761,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_register_driver); > > -/** > +/* > * cpufreq_unregister_driver - unregister the current CPUFreq driver And this should be there for sure. > * > * Unregister the current CPUFreq driver. Only call this if you have > -- > 2.25.1 -- viresh