From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DF3C433DF for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6B72067D for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="jGogWDgb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727990AbgGOGcT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:32:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34104 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725922AbgGOGcS (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:32:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com (mail-wm1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::344]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C349C061794 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id q15so4146539wmj.2 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:32:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=pkHUcVa4GYgE65LjnGsodAOm4gwGb9et7Xg2bzrwdzE=; b=jGogWDgbgbl2Aen5UYcLTTHJfC/9rpVJZsfavJSZ7TkB5UwdLUMDooQoT6g+wKKZw9 pZHxPvxYwfTgAFzLCmz+mWXsHQuf4K+jmnjlmHf08qnBBgAEJifed9e/K9+61lg/9W6F qUDNBAit2SLTA4D++TMePb0pZdD5qlETRBG6ZREFNiC6cj5qKW3ix/j6eMxcthF7Em8m ZmILsRfMBsfk7btqm+m4BKYdWFj0kKbuGYJyGJeoRVd8hv+etMhaR2O9xRbxHdQVpMOG Sh1xCQiazfBihP6e29yQc2uONwoPl7CTIMkQE0fKSQFjE/mdkvASHRFmZ+VsRuk4Lxhe okZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=pkHUcVa4GYgE65LjnGsodAOm4gwGb9et7Xg2bzrwdzE=; b=plBWHrCZf3PCR6nWmyEkj3EzeY95RYmu0gyQWbS/wnBBHp1hFYPU/09hYPCvhixyBB 0m85clTlQeu/hOupYpzC0Y2Wk9i+lzFCHs4b83PFfPdPTV28Bcv5tfbL1j2q/KopYq0Q IMFdf1oRIzNXFZ7j/HbGa4KGN/szevzKaoXYQIkT9hpD91pZmqYoTNdEDyKgO3KQ//YH dmMNigSqt6g3uYu/403s7hAUvJujKLeFlpyxW4j0d1rHa821gRNxaJbBlesHraEVwfMc lTEJIqiqZCIOUt/eMLeI39H3gF3uF92ZCyET8shqdaliV8qcKKIFbvlyoyMTDTJWlNcH 6/Rw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dNicfr68yc3/AIom28Su3Pdyf2CCXeYRItWnHlKwI9UigyLFC LMU1HGGwpBJ/cpqa5o7zcqS1CGHl1tc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMK1q+aFYu8Ne/pvxzKFhE4bmkNgHpgH+yuuJVXawMMk1x0V0KEwkym2ub6wbPjV351i6yeg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f60d:: with SMTP id w13mr7440522wmc.51.1594794737161; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([2.31.163.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm1827418wma.43.2020.07.14.23.32.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:32:14 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Viresh Kumar Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Message-ID: <20200715063214.GO1398296@dell> References: <20200714145049.2496163-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20200715033627.k6ardlhm3z3w65xw@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200715033627.k6ardlhm3z3w65xw@vireshk-i7> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some > changes in cpufreq.c there. It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog