From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34DCC433E0 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836FC2068F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="fHTiNevZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728894AbgGOGiE (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:38:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728892AbgGOGiD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:38:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com (mail-pg1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0C7C061794 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id o13so2599330pgf.0 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:38:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2A3+9mh7yY4DJ4BNChsPgiBj6NoPHiNP3Ku5vhAEZsI=; b=fHTiNevZHDxEboHxqvUWoy3orjXk5gSBI46aF/9Y4GQlLCOTFoppVfPG7rZK4m/ZK8 PgaXGu+LY7MGwnGI3qt3tyRT24g7k9jBerVoRojW0jzwCL4bIbRPRH/w/9ePABonlfCX ZxfLOO/7BXPNev3nPT42007h0O8o7oBuJDJpGD7udd+a4nGteEPuCfTacEemz6Pl74ym Es472qxqt0y/qXxDM2IvUh/oCHlzBnYoTR8nmSZvB/9q76kbmpglBVPqz4pQRf6ddVC6 1MaNsVeD4zz25LfnmnAmJ8r+yNaKNwPhR01Xf2qhG5PKP5FTSKnHWttmJBg1mMNkKDH7 mRlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2A3+9mh7yY4DJ4BNChsPgiBj6NoPHiNP3Ku5vhAEZsI=; b=blKHC9jUQ89JswKJANMak2sDwkWX/+bcOlCN7knPCYAx0jl1nIKhjEHcCeLYO9VWGr QeUJdVI6iLrMmjb6p1gqCVtjuve0IT5tG2uYiGEq8EBcK/qPElOw9ZcZVaAqC2kmXz2T fIjB6TeqSyaCaF2YGQYZ268onBW/pegj4Mv722VLbDHXvnOHvtSYbceVyIrYdhT8Fyp6 jZHe63X394jlkdXhQ5PGjsM79SW04Pai95jrFoinfTrnMvCJ3g/T71VgpnGFMJjkyt1D TWLNYtzTrHTZJwtzg9kMAGuLYgysAKGiEtcfpP+t8sBpQgBkG+8j8JxPprQsJ19t1se0 O8jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532CINra0ErVlcOK3k/UNIelGf02PnAk43FC+366afiVuNyOiSyB MFTZ2xMJx70Wlh016lDI3DzRWg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiES3Dzi7xr3uSng0QWol6Q63ReF9HR9TiEoQfZiYF2zVKPRtW4D1KZgZKAe+SQhn3apRuSg== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5b05:: with SMTP id y5mr6690468pgq.90.1594795082971; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.172.34.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gv16sm934295pjb.5.2020.07.14.23.38.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:08:00 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Lee Jones Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Message-ID: <20200715063800.4vfxie2wrmaqdnra@vireshk-i7> References: <20200714145049.2496163-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20200715033627.k6ardlhm3z3w65xw@vireshk-i7> <20200715063214.GO1398296@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200715063214.GO1398296@dell> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 15-07-20, 07:32, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. > > > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some > > changes in cpufreq.c there. > > It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next? Yes it is. Actually my bad, I based it on my next which didn't had pm/linux-next :) -- viresh