linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Cc: amitk@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
	tdas@codeaurora.org,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use of_device_get_match_data for offsets and row size
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:54:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915072423.18437-5-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915072423.18437-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

For preparing the driver to handle further SoC revisions, let's use the
of_device_get_match_data() API for getting the device specific offsets
and row size instead of defining them globally.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 8a303783927f..e3c46984a037 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -19,15 +19,21 @@
 #define LUT_L_VAL			GENMASK(7, 0)
 #define LUT_CORE_COUNT			GENMASK(18, 16)
 #define LUT_VOLT			GENMASK(11, 0)
-#define LUT_ROW_SIZE			32
 #define CLK_HW_DIV			2
 #define LUT_TURBO_IND			1
 
-/* Register offsets */
-#define REG_ENABLE			0x0
-#define REG_FREQ_LUT			0x110
-#define REG_VOLT_LUT			0x114
-#define REG_PERF_STATE			0x920
+struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data {
+	u32 reg_enable;
+	u32 reg_freq_lut;
+	u32 reg_volt_lut;
+	u32 reg_perf_state;
+	u8 lut_row_size;
+};
+
+struct qcom_cpufreq_data {
+	void __iomem *base;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
+};
 
 static unsigned long cpu_hw_rate, xo_rate;
 static bool icc_scaling_enabled;
@@ -76,10 +82,11 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(struct device *cpu_dev,
 static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					unsigned int index)
 {
-	void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
+	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
 	unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
 
-	writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
+	writel_relaxed(index, data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
 
 	if (icc_scaling_enabled)
 		qcom_cpufreq_set_bw(policy, freq);
@@ -91,7 +98,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	void __iomem *perf_state_reg;
+	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	unsigned int index;
 
@@ -99,9 +107,10 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (!policy)
 		return 0;
 
-	perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
+	data = policy->driver_data;
+	soc_data = data->soc_data;
 
-	index = readl_relaxed(perf_state_reg);
+	index = readl_relaxed(data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
 	index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
 
 	return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
@@ -110,12 +119,13 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
 static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 						unsigned int target_freq)
 {
-	void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
+	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
 	unsigned int index;
 	unsigned long freq;
 
 	index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
-	writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
+	writel_relaxed(index, data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
 
 	freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
 	arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
@@ -125,8 +135,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 }
 
 static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
-				    struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-				    void __iomem *base)
+				    struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
 	u32 volt;
@@ -134,6 +143,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
 	struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
 	unsigned long rate;
 	int ret;
+	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *drv_data = policy->driver_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = drv_data->soc_data;
 
 	table = kcalloc(LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!table)
@@ -160,14 +171,14 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
-		data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_FREQ_LUT +
-				      i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
+		data = readl_relaxed(drv_data->base + soc_data->reg_freq_lut +
+				      i * soc_data->lut_row_size);
 		src = FIELD_GET(LUT_SRC, data);
 		lval = FIELD_GET(LUT_L_VAL, data);
 		core_count = FIELD_GET(LUT_CORE_COUNT, data);
 
-		data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_VOLT_LUT +
-				      i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
+		data = readl_relaxed(drv_data->base + soc_data->reg_volt_lut +
+				      i * soc_data->lut_row_size);
 		volt = FIELD_GET(LUT_VOLT, data) * 1000;
 
 		if (src)
@@ -237,6 +248,20 @@ static void qcom_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpumask *m)
 	}
 }
 
+static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data qcom_soc_data = {
+	.reg_enable = 0x0,
+	.reg_freq_lut = 0x110,
+	.reg_volt_lut = 0x114,
+	.reg_perf_state = 0x920,
+	.lut_row_size = 32,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw", .data = &qcom_soc_data },
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_cpufreq_hw_match);
+
 static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
@@ -245,6 +270,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	struct device_node *cpu_np;
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
 	void __iomem *base;
+	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
 	int ret, index;
 
 	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
@@ -270,8 +296,17 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	if (IS_ERR(base))
 		return PTR_ERR(base);
 
+	data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!data) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto error;
+	}
+
+	data->soc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+	data->base = base;
+
 	/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
-	if (!(readl_relaxed(base + REG_ENABLE) & 0x1)) {
+	if (!(readl_relaxed(base + data->soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", index);
 		ret = -ENODEV;
 		goto error;
@@ -284,9 +319,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		goto error;
 	}
 
-	policy->driver_data = base + REG_PERF_STATE;
+	policy->driver_data = data;
 
-	ret = qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(cpu_dev, policy, base);
+	ret = qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(cpu_dev, policy);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to read LUT\n", index);
 		goto error;
@@ -310,13 +345,13 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
-	void __iomem *base = policy->driver_data - REG_PERF_STATE;
+	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
 	struct platform_device *pdev = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
 
 	dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(cpu_dev);
 	dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(policy->related_cpus);
 	kfree(policy->freq_table);
-	devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, base);
+	devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, data->base);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -386,12 +421,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver);
 }
 
-static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw" },
-	{}
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_cpufreq_hw_match);
-
 static struct platform_driver qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver = {
 	.probe = qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe,
 	.remove = qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove,
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-15  7:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add CPUFreq support for SM8250 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-15  7:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Document Qcom EPSS compatible Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-15  7:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add cpufreq hw node Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-15  7:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-15  7:24 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2020-09-15 15:21   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use of_device_get_match_data for offsets and row size Bjorn Andersson
2020-09-15  7:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add cpufreq support for SM8250 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-16  7:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Add CPUFreq " Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200915072423.18437-5-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=amitk@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).