linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksitaraman@nvidia.com,
	bbasu@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/2] cpufreq: tegra194: Fix unlisted boot freq warning
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:24:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201005045414.fmntm7ejad7zxcrv@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1600276277-7290-3-git-send-email-sumitg@nvidia.com>

On 16-09-20, 22:41, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> Warning coming during boot because the boot freq set by bootloader
> gets filtered out due to big freq steps while creating freq_table.
> Fixing this by setting closest ndiv value from freq_table.
> Warning:
>   cpufreq: cpufreq_online: CPU0: Running at unlisted freq
>   cpufreq: cpufreq_online: CPU0: Unlisted initial frequency changed
> 
> Also, added change in init to wait till current frequency becomes
> equal or near to the previously requested frequency. This is done
> because it takes some time to restore the previous frequency while
> turning-on non-boot cores during exit from SC7(Suspend-to-RAM).

So you are trying to figure if the frequency is listed in freq-table or not,
otherwise setting the frequency to a value you think is appropriate. Right ?

This is what the cpufreq core already does when it printed these boot time
messages. Do we really need to add this much code in here ?

If you really don't want to see the warning, how about fixing it the way cpufreq
core does ? i.e. with this call:

ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->cur - 1, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);

-- 
viresh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-05  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-16 17:11 [Patch 0/2] Tegra194 cpufreq driver misc changes Sumit Gupta
2020-09-16 17:11 ` [Patch 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: get consistent cpuinfo_cur_freq Sumit Gupta
2020-09-17  8:36   ` Jon Hunter
2020-09-17  8:44     ` Jon Hunter
2020-09-23  8:34       ` Jon Hunter
2020-10-05  4:34     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-05  9:12       ` Jon Hunter
2020-09-24  8:56   ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-05  4:46   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-05 18:40     ` Sumit Gupta
2020-09-16 17:11 ` [Patch 2/2] cpufreq: tegra194: Fix unlisted boot freq warning Sumit Gupta
2020-09-17  8:38   ` Jon Hunter
2020-09-17  8:45     ` Jon Hunter
2020-09-24  8:56   ` Thierry Reding
2020-10-05  4:54   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2020-10-05 18:54     ` Sumit Gupta
2020-10-06  5:38       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-08 11:11         ` Sumit Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201005045414.fmntm7ejad7zxcrv@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).