linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] devfreq: tegra30: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_opp()
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:56:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122062659.qss3hef4kltfgciu@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71451eb2-46b2-1ea0-efcc-0811568159a4@gmail.com>

On 22-01-21, 00:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 21.01.2021 14:17, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> > dev_pm_opp_set_bw() is getting removed and dev_pm_opp_set_opp() should
> > be used instead. Migrate to the new API.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> > index 117cad7968ab..d2477d7d1f66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> > @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> >  		return PTR_ERR(opp);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ret = dev_pm_opp_set_bw(dev, opp);
> > +	ret = dev_pm_opp_set_opp(dev, opp);
> >  	dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> >  
> >  	return ret;
> > 
> 
> This patch introduces a very serious change that needs to be fixed.
> 
> Now dev_pm_opp_set_opp() changes both clock rate and bandwidth, this is
> unacceptable for this driver because it shall not touch the clock rate.
> 
> I think dev_pm_opp_set_bw() can't be removed.

I am wondering here on what would be a better solution, do what you
said or introduce another helper like dev_pm_opp_clear_clk(), which
will make sure the OPP core doesn't play with device's clk.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21 11:17 [PATCH 00/13] opp: Implement dev_pm_opp_set_opp() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] opp: Rename _opp_set_rate_zero() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] opp: No need to check clk for errors Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] opp: Keep track of currently programmed OPP Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 21:41   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-22  4:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-22 14:31       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-25  3:12         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-27 16:31       ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-01-28  4:14         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-07 10:24   ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-07-08  7:53     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-09  8:57       ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-07-12  4:14         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] opp: Split _set_opp() out of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] opp: Allow _set_opp() to work for non-freq devices Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] opp: Allow _generic_set_opp_regulator() " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 07/13] opp: Allow _generic_set_opp_clk_only() " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 20:26   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-22  4:35     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-25 21:09       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-27  6:58         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] opp: Update parameters of _set_opp_custom() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] opp: Implement dev_pm_opp_set_opp() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] cpufreq: qcom: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_opp() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] devfreq: tegra30: " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 21:36   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-22  6:26     ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2021-01-22 15:28       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-25  3:14         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-25 16:00           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-27  9:10   ` [PATCH V2 " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-27 10:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-27 15:58       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-28  7:01         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-02-01  0:21     ` Chanwoo Choi
2021-02-01 19:57     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm: msm: " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 13/13] opp: Remove dev_pm_opp_set_bw() Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210122062659.qss3hef4kltfgciu@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).